Advertisement

Introduction

  • Christine Musselin
  • Pedro N. Teixeira
Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 41)

Abstract

Higher education and research have reached the top of governmental agendas, since they are expected to play a crucial role in knowledge societies. In all countries, they have been for many years at the centre of reforms aimed at deeply transforming university practices and governance that are considered poorly adapted to contemporary settings and to the new missions that universities and research institutions are expected to fulfill.

The rationales underlying those changes have been the subject of significant debates. In order to explain the reforms in higher education and research, many authors have mentioned the influence of New Public Management. The developments in higher education at the institutional level also suggest that we need to go beyond those general statements and trends. In recent decades, there has been a significant strengthening of institutional autonomy in many higher education systems, notably in Europe. The more this trend has developed, the less likely it is that the implementation of policy reforms will be a straightforward and reactive sequence. On the other hand, this growing institutional autonomy has been accompanied by a growing institutional differentiation in many higher education systems. This differentiation has had multiple sources, from legal changes to different financial treatment by governments, though it has certainly contributed to making the institutional landscape increasingly more diverse across and within higher education systems. Thus, although many higher education systems have shared commonalities in this reform trend, the way they have responded may present significant differences at the national and institutional levels and this will likely have an impact on the way policies are designed and implemented.

In this introductory chapter, we will start by setting the context of change that has characterized European higher education over the last three decades. Then, we will reflect upon the extent to which the analysis of policy design and policy reform may be affected by those aforementioned changes and suggest three different but complementary ways of looking at reforms. Finally, we will present the contents of the volume.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution Policy Reform High Education System Policy Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amaral, A., Jones, G., & Karseth, B. (Eds.). (2002). Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  2. Amaral, A., Meek, V. L., & Larsen, I. M. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Amaral, A., Musselin, C., Neave, G., & Maassen, P. (Eds.). (2009). European integration and the governance of higher education and research. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, N. (2004). Economics of the welfare state (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barr, N., & Crawford, I. (2004). Financing higher education – Answers from the UK. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Barrier, J. (2010). La Science en Projets. Régimes de Financement et Reconfigurations du Travail des Chercheurs Académiques. Le Cas des Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication en France (1982–2006). PhD in Sociology, Sciences Po, Paris.Google Scholar
  7. Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1991). Process and structure in higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Lepori, B., & Musselin, C. (2011). NPM, network governance and the university as a changing professional organization. In T. Christensen & P. Laegreid (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to new public management (pp. 161–176). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  9. Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace – The commercialization of higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Braun, D., & Merrien, F.-X. (Eds.). (1999). Governance of universities in a comparative perspective. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.Google Scholar
  11. Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersonn, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M., & Kogan, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education – The challenge of the quality movement (Higher education policy series 34). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Clotfelter, C. (1996). Buying the best – Cost escalation in higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clotfelter, C. (Ed.). (2010). American universities in a global market. Chicago: NBER and Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dahl, R., & Lindblom, C. (1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  17. De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geiger, R. L. (2004). Knowledge and money: American research universities and the paradox of the marketplace. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gornitzka, A., Kogan, M., & Amaral, A. (Eds.). (2005). Reform and change in higher education: Analysing policy implementation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, P. (Ed.). (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities. Policy change in higher education. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kehm, B., & Stensaker, B. (Eds.). (2009). University rankings, diversity, and the new landscape of higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Krücken, G., & Meier, J. (2006). Turning the university into an organizational actor. In G. S. Drori, J. W. Meyer, & H. Hwang (Eds.), Globalization and organization: World society and organizational change (pp. 241–257). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Le Galès, P., & Scott, A. (2010). A British bureaucratic revolution? Autonomy without control or “Freer actors more rules”. English Annual selection of the Revue Française de Sociologie, 51(1), 119–146.Google Scholar
  28. Leisyte, L. (2011). Research commercialization policies and their implementation in the Netherlands and in the US. Science and Public Policy, 38(6), 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Majone, G., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation as evolution. In J. L. Pressman & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Implementation (3rd ed., pp. 163–180). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (Eds.). (2010). The changing dynamics of higher education middle management. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Middlehurst, R., & Teixeira, P. (2012). Governance within the EHEA: Dynamic trends, common challenges, and national particularities. In P. Scott, A. Curaj, L. Vlasceanu, & L. Wilson (Eds.), European higher education at the crossroads: Between the Bologna process and national reforms (Vol. 2, pp. 527–551). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller, P., & Jobert, B. (1987). L’état en action. Politiques publiques et corporatismes. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  33. Musselin, C. (2005). Change and continuity in higher education governance? Lessons drawn from twenty years of national reforms in European countries. In I. Bleiklie & M. Henkel (Eds.), Governing knowledge. A study of continuity and change in higher education; a festschrift in honour of Maurice Kogan (pp. 65–80). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Musselin, C. (2006). Are universities specific organizations? In G. Krücken, A. Kosmützky, & M. Torka (Eds.), Towards a multiversity? Universities between global trends and national traditions (pp. 63–84). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Neave, G. (2009). Institutional Autonomy 2010–2020. A tale of Elan – Two steps back to make one very large leap forward. In B. Kehm, J. Huisman, & B. Stensaker (Eds.), Mapping the future of the European higher education area: Perspectives on a moving target (pp. 3–22). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Neave, G., & Van Vught, F. (Eds.). (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Newman, F., Couturier, L., & Scurry, J. (2004). The future of higher education – Rhetoric, reality, and the risks of the market. Baltimore: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  38. Palfreyman, D., & Tapper, T. (Eds.). (2009). Structuring mass higher education – The role of elite institutions. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (2009). University governance. Western European comparative perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Pollitt, C., & Bourckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Regini, M. (2011). European universities and the challenge of the market: A comparative analysis. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sabatier, P. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schneider, A. L., & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  45. Schneider, A. L., & Sidney, M. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? The Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwarz, S., & Westerheijden, D. F. (Eds.). (2004). Accreditation and evaluation in the European higher education area. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  47. Scott, P. (1995). The meanings of mass higher education. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Shattock, M. (2006). Managing good governance in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Shattock, M. (Ed.). (2008). Entrepreneurialism in universities and the knowledge economy: Diversification and organizational change in European higher education. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism – Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  51. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stensaker, B., & Harvey, L. (Eds.). (2011). Accountability in higher education: Global perspectives on trust and power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Stone, D. (1988). Policy paradox. The art of political decision making. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, J., Ferreira, J. B., Machado, M. L., & Santiago, R. (2008). Non-university higher education in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Teixeira, P., & Dill, D. (2011). Public vices, private interests? Assessing the effects of marketization in higher education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  56. Teixeira, P., Dill, D., Jongbloed, B., & Amaral, A. (Eds.). (2004). Markets in higher education: Reality or rhetoric? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  57. Trow, M. (2010). Twentieth-century higher education – Elite to mass to universal. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  58. Weisbrod, B., Pallou, J., & Asch, E. (2008). Mission and money – Understanding the university. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Westerheijden, D., Stensaker, B., & Rosa, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Quality assurance in higher education – Trends in regulation, translation and transformation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Whitley, R. (2008). Universities as strategic actors: Limitations and variations. In L. Engwall & D. Weaire (Eds.), The university in the market (pp. 23–37). London: Portland Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Sciences Po and CNRSParisFrance
  2. 2.CIPES and Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations