The Analysis of the Participants’ Personality for the Contestants of the National Skills Competition

  • Kung-Huang Lin
  • You-Syun Jheng
  • Lawrence Y. Deng
  • Jiung-Yao Huang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 253)

Abstract

The article aims to analyze the personality traits between the winners from the Golden Hands Award of National Skills Competition and the other students under the Industry-Related, Agriculture-Related, and Marine Fisheries-Related. This paper undergoes the Independent Samples t Test and One-Way ANOVA on the data by using SPSS. The experiment results showed that there are a number of variations in personality traits for different vocational categories. The forward personality of skills competition award winners are significantly higher than the student without participating in the skills competition training. Moreover, the profile data on gender under different vocational categories, family background, and birth order, were also observed with several personality traits showing significant differences. Hence, this study aims to find out the personality traits of the previous award winners and recommend suitable students to participate in the National Skills Competition.

Keywords

Golden hands award Personality traits Background variables Statistical analysis National skills competition 

References

  1. 1.
    Allport GW (1961) Pattern and growth in personality. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol 41:417–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldberg LR (1992) The development of markers for the Big-five factor structure. Psychol Assess 4(1):26–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Husin LIBA, Zaidi NA (2011) The correlation effects between big five personality traits and job satisfaction among support staff in an organization. Humanities, science and engineering (CHUSER), pp 883–887Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kassin S (2003) Psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22(140):1–55Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin SC (2008) The relationships between humor styles, ridicule styles and big-5 personality traits of high school students. Master’s theses, National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan: 097NTNU5328030Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin NP, Chiu HC (1999) A study of service quality—the effects and applications of service providers’ personality traits. J Manag 16(2):175–200Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Connor BP (2002) A quantitative review of the comprehensiveness of the five-factor model in relation to popular personality inventories. Assessment 9:188–203Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saucier G (1994) Mini-markers: a brief version of goldberg’s unipolar big-five markers. J Pers Assess 63(3):506–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi M, Li X, Zhu T, Shi K (2010) The relationship between regulatory emotional self-efficacy, big-five personality and internet events attitude. Web Society (SWS), pp. 61–65Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xie J, Lin R, Jeng YC, Li J (2010) How different personality types are related to perception of professional ethics. IET international conference, pp 241–246Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kung-Huang Lin
    • 1
  • You-Syun Jheng
    • 2
  • Lawrence Y. Deng
    • 3
  • Jiung-Yao Huang
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate Institude of Human Resource ManagementNational Changhua University of EducationChanghuaTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringNational Taipei UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of CSIESt. John’s UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations