Skip to main content

Performance Comparison of Wireless Sensor Networks for Different Sink Speeds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1106 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 253))

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have become a hot research topic in academia as well as in industry in recent years due to its wide range of applications ranging from medical research to military. In this paper, we study the effect of mobile sink in WSN performance. The WSNs should allow a systematic deployment of sensor nodes including mobility among the sensor nodes. The disseminated data from the sensor nodes are gathered at the sink node. Data dissemination is the major source for energy consumption in WSNs. We consider as evaluation parameter goodput and depletion to evaluate the performance of WSNs considering different speeds of mobile sink. The simulation results show that, when the \( T_{r} \) is lower than 10 pps, the network is not congested and the goodput is higher when the sink node moves faster (20 m/s). When \( T_{r} \) is lower than 10, the depletion is higher when sink moves with lower speed (5 m/s). But, when \( T_{r} \) is larger than 10, the depletion is higher for higher values of the sink speed (20 m/s).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Giordano S, Rosenberg C (2006) Topics in ad hoc and sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag 44(4):97–97

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu W, Bulusu N, Jha S (2007) Overload traffic management for sensor networks. ACM Trans Sens Networks 3(4):18–38

    Google Scholar 

  3. Somasundara AA, Kansal A, Jea DD, Estrin D, Srivastava MB (2006) Controllably mobile infrastructure for low energy embedded networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 5(8):958–973

    Google Scholar 

  4. Younis O, Fahmy S (2004) HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad-hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 3(4):366–379

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kulkarni SS (2004) TDMA services for sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on distributed computing systems workshops. pp 604–609

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ye W, Heidemann J, Estrin D (2004) Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking 12(3):493–506

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang T, De Marco G, Ikeda M, Barolli L (2006) Impact of radio randomness on performances of lattice wireless sensor networks based on event-reliability concept. Mobile Inform Syst (MIS) 2(4):211–227

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baruah P, Urgaonkar R, Krishnamachari B (2004) Learning-enforced time domain routing to mobile sinks in wireless sensor fields. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual IEEE international conference on LCN-2004, pp 525–532

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luo J, Hubaux J-P (2005) Joint mobility and routing for lifetime elongation in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM-2005, pp 1735–1746

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang T, Ikeda M, Mino G, Barolli L, Durresi A, Xhafa F (2010) Performance evaluation of wireless sensor networks for mobile sink considering consumed energy metric. In: Proceedings of the AINA-2010, pp 245-250

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang T, Barolli L, Iwashige J, Durresi A, Xhafa F (2011) Comparison evaluation of static and mobile sensor nodes in wireless sensor networks consider packet-loss and delay metrics. In: Proceeding of the INCoS-2011, pp 196–202

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donward I (2004) NRL’s sensor network extension to NS-2. http://pf.itd.nrl.navy.mil/analysisnrlsensorsim/

  13. Crossbow Technology Inc., http://www.xbow.com/

  14. Rappaport TS (2001) Wireless communications. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vincze Z, Fodor K, Vida R, Vidacs A (2006) Lectrostatic modelling of multiple mobile sinks in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the IFIP networking workshop on performance control in wireless sensor networks (PWSN2006), pp 30–37

    Google Scholar 

  16. Akan OB, Akyildiz IF (2005) Event-to-sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking 13(5):1003–1016

    Google Scholar 

  17. Perkins C (ed) (2001) Ad hoc networks, Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elis Kulla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, T., Kulla, E., Barolli, L., Mino, G., Takizawa, M. (2013). Performance Comparison of Wireless Sensor Networks for Different Sink Speeds. In: Park, J., Barolli, L., Xhafa, F., Jeong, HY. (eds) Information Technology Convergence. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 253. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6996-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6996-0_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6995-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6996-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics