Abstract
The chapter complements the previous chapters in that it draws upon the reflections of teachers who have worked with SPRinG; moving from theory to practice as well as adding classroom insights associated with implementing SPRinG principles in classrooms. Chapter 7 describes the process of implementing and working with the SPRinG programme in authentic KS2 classrooms. As such, the aims and content of the chapter make this different in style from the preceding chapters (4–6). 21 SPRinG teachers from 7 schools provided interview and other material concerning the programme for at least one year. Teachers spoke about their experiences of participating as a whole school effort and how fitting the intervention into the day-to-day curriculum of their classrooms. Thematic analysis of the interviews revealed: Teachers prepared their classrooms for SPRinG by creating, stable mixed groups for learning, ensuring that children could communicate effectively with their group partners and including children with special needs and emotional problems within groups. Lessons and curriculum subjects were prepared to facilitate group working, especially allowing children to be included via briefing and debriefing, and ensuring that the distribution of learning resources allowed for group interaction. The role of the teacher received special consideration, with those teachers most committed to the SPRinG programme reflecting on the change in their roles over the school year—from being a knowing ‘sage’ to being a ‘guide’ who listened and supported group working. Correspondingly, children were described as becoming less teacher-dependent and showing much greater capabilities in structuring, supporting and maintaining learning within their own groups. Teachers further commented that the relational approach was seen as fundamental to the establishment of effective group working in their classrooms and that this approach was likely to be most effective when started at the beginning of the school year. Two important features of effective group working in classrooms were identified. First, where there was active support from school senior management whole school support and collegial support, SPRinG was associated with more positive reports of effective implementation. Second, ownership and implementation of the SPRinG principles varied between teachers; those who were less committed were described as ‘SPRinGLite’ and their classroom effects appeared less positive. Teachers’ experiences reinforced the overall success of the SPRinG programme but also provided insights into the challenges and hard won successes that they and their pupils had encountered along the way.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In England, a ‘statement’ is provided by the Local authority and indicates that to meet a child’s special educational needs, additional special provision, beyond the everyday resources and provision that a school has, is required.
- 2.
A UK television soap opera.
References
Baines, E., Blatchford, P., & Kutnick, P. (2003). Grouping practices in classrooms: Changing patterns over primary and secondary schooling. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 9–34.
Baines, E., Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Chowne, A., Ota, C., & Berdondini, L. (2009a). Promoting effective group work in the primary classroom: A handbook for teachers and practitioners. London: Routledge.
Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., & Blatchford, P. (2009b). Improving pupil group work interaction and dialogue in primary classrooms: Results from a year-long intervention study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 95–117.
Bennett, N., & Dunne, E. (1992). Managing classroom groups. Hemel Hempstead: Simon & Schuster Education.
Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., Bassett, P., & Chowne, A. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group work on pupil-pupil and teacher-pupil interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 750–765.
Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 153–172.
Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Cohen, E. G., & Intilli, J. K. (1981). Interdependence and management in bilingual classrooms. Final Report No. NIE-G-80-0217) Stanford, CA: Stanford University, School of Education.
Cowie, H., Smith, P., Boulton, M., & Laver, R. (1994). Cooperation in the multi-ethnic classroom. London: David Foulton.
Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The social development of the intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.
Galton, M. J., & Williamson, J. (1992). Group-work in the primary classroom. London: Routledge.
Gillies, R. (2003). Structuring cooperative group-work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 35–49.
Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 983–940.
Howe, C. (2010). Peer groups and children’s development. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Howe, C., Duchak-Tanner, V., & Tolmie, A. (2000). Coordinating support for conceptual and procedural learning in science. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner & D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning (pp. 81–100). London: Free Association Books.
Howe, C. J., & Tolmie, A. (2003). Group work in primary school science: Discussion, consensus and guidance from experts. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 51–72.
Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1998). Effective staff development in cooperative learning: training, transfer and long term use. In C. M. Brody & N. Davidson (Eds.), Professional development for cooperative learning: Issues and approaches. Albany: New York Press.
Kutnick, P., & Berdondini, L. (2009). Can the enhancement of group working in classrooms provide a basis for effective communication in support of school-based cognitive achievement in classrooms of young learners? Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 71–94.
Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P., & Baines, E. (2002). Pupil groupings in primary school classrooms: Sites for learning and social pedagogy. British Education Research Journal, 28(2), 187–206.
Kutnick, P., Ota, C., & Berdondini, L. (2008). Improving the effects of group working in classrooms with young school-aged children: Facilitating attainment, interaction and classroom activity. Learning and Instruction, 18, 83–95.
Lewis, J., & Cowie, H. (1993). Cooperative group work: Promises and limitations a study of teachers’ values. Education Section Review, 17(2), 77–84.
McGuinness, C. (1999). From thinking skills to thinking classrooms: A review and evaluation of approaches for developing pupils’ thinking. London: HMSO.
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–113.
Plummer, G., & Dudley, P. (1993). Assessing children learning collaboratively. Chelmsford: Essex Development Advisory Service.
Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 73–97.
Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (841–873). New York: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baines, E. (2014). Teachers’ Experiences of Implementing the SPRinG Programme in Schools. In: Effective Group Work in Primary School Classrooms. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6991-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6990-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6991-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)