Medieval and Early Modern Theories

Chapter
Part of the Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind book series (SHPM, volume 12)

Abstract

Late ancient attempts to combine Aristotelian and Neoplatonic ideas of the mind continued among Arabic philosophers who were acquainted with ancient philosophy through numerous translations, including parts of Plotinus’ Enneads under the title The Theology of Aristotle. Through the twelfth-century translation of the sixth book of Avicenna’s Kitāb al-Shifā (The Book of Healing), Avicenna’s conception of the soul influenced twelfth- and early thirteenth-century Latin philosophy of mind, the second main source being Augustine. Both Augustine’s and Avicenna’s views of the soul belong to the Platonic tradition, and hence emphasise the independence of the soul from the body and its self-knowledge. Through a thought-experiment known as ‘the flying man’, Avicenna asks what knowledge humans without any sense experience would have. The answer is that they would know that they exist. Treating the soul as an immaterial substance, Avicenna explained that the Aristotelian formula of the soul as a form of the body is an expression of its function rather than its essence. Augustinian thinkers stressed the unity of a spiritual and immaterial soul as the centre of mental activities.

Keywords

Thirteenth Century Human Soul Substantial Form Immaterial Sphere Human Intellect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. John Buridan. (1513). Quaestiones super decem libros Ethicorum Aristotelis ad Nicomachum. Paris. Reprint Frankfurt an Main: Minerva 1968. Questions on book X of the ethics, translation in The Cambridge translations of medieval philosophical texts. Volume II: Ethics and political philosophy (pp. 498–586), eds. A. S. McGrade, J. Kilcullen, & M. Kempshall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Bazán, B. C. (1997). The human soul: Form and substance? Thomas Aquinas’ critique of ecclectic aristotelianism. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge, 64, 95–126.Google Scholar
  3. Bazán, B. C. (2005). Radical aristotelianism in the faculties of arts. The case of Siger of Brabant. In L. Honnefelder et al. (Eds.), Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter (pp. 585–629). Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
  4. Bricke, J. (1980). Hume’s philosophy of mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carriero, J. (2009). Between two worlds: A reading of Descartes’s ‘Meditations’. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Casini, L. (2007). The Renaissance debate on the immortality of the soul: Pietro Pomponazzi and the plurality of substantial forms, in Bakker & Thijssen (Eds.), 127–150.Google Scholar
  7. Dale, A. I. (1995). A history of inverse probability. From Thomas Bayes to Karl Pearson. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, H. A. (1992). Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes, on intellect. Their cosmologies, theories of the active intellect, and theories of human intellect. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Della Rocca, M. (1996). Representation and the mind-body problem in Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hasse, D. N. (2000). Avicenna’s De anima in the latin west. The formation of a peripatetic philosophy of the soul 1160–1300. London/Turin: The Warburg Institute/Aragno.Google Scholar
  11. Hutton, S. (2007). Cambridge Platonists. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu
  12. Ivry, A. (2008b). Arabic and Islamic psychology and philosophy of mind. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu
  13. Jolley, N. (1999). Locke: His philosophical thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kärkkäinen, P., & Lagerlund, H. (2009). Philosophical psychology in 1500: Erfurt, Padua and Bologna, in Heinämaa & Reuter (Eds.), 27–45.Google Scholar
  15. Kulstad, M., & Carlin, L. (2007). Leibniz’s philosophy of mind. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu
  16. Lagerlund, H. (2004). John Buridan and the problems of dualism in the early fourteenth century. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lagerlund, H. (2008). The unity of the soul and contrary appetites in medieval philosophy, in Lennon & Stainton (Eds.), 75–91.Google Scholar
  18. Leijenhorst, C. (2002). The mechanisation of aristotelianism. The late Aristotelian setting of Thomas Hobbes’ natural philosophy (Medieval and early modern science 3). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  19. Libéra, A. de. (1994). Thomas d’Aquin. Contre Averroès antérieurs à 1270, text, translation and notes. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Google Scholar
  20. Pasnau, R. (2002a). Thomas Aquinas on human nature. A philosophical study of Summa theologiæ Ia 75–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pasnau, R. (Ed.). (2002b). The Cambridge translations of medieval philosophical texts, volume III: Mind and knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rozemond, M. (1998). Descartes’s dualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Silva, J. F. (2012). Robert Kilwardby on the human soul: Plurality of forms and censorship in the thirteenth century (Investigating medieval philosophy 3). Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. South, J. B. (2012). Suárez, immortality, and the soul’s dependence on the body. In B. Hill & H. Lagerlund (Eds.), The philosophy of Francisco Suárez (pp. 121–136). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zupko, J. (2004). On Buridan’s alleged alexandrianism: Heterodoxy and natural philosophy in fourteenth-century Paris. Vivarium, 42, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zupko, J. (2007). John Buridan on the immateriality of the human intellect, in Lagerlund (Ed.), 129–217.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyThe University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations