Abstract
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques are based on providing parameter estimates from ultrasound backscattered signals that can be related to different properties of the tissue. Parameter estimates based on analyzing the spectrum of the ultrasound backscattered signal or the amplitude distribution of the envelope require a certain number of samples to produce meaningful estimates in terms of bias and variance of estimates. For example, calculation of the periodogram is used to approximate the true backscattered power spectrum of the ultrasound signal. Typically, the larger the samples size the better the periodogram represents the backscattered power spectrum and the better the bias and variance of QUS estimates. Analysis of the statistics of parameter estimation for spectral-based parameters and envelope statistics will allow the tradeoff between sample size and estimate bias and variance to be quantified. This chapter discusses the statistics of QUS property estimation, the effects of estimate bias and variance on the resolution of QUS parameter imaging, and techniques to reduce the variance of different QUS property estimates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chaturvedi P, Insana MF (1996) Error bounds on ultrasonic scatterer size estimates. J Acoust Soc Am, 100:392–399
Destrempes F, Cloutier G (2010) A critical review and uniformized representation of statistical distributions modeling the ultrasound echo envelope. Ultrasound Med Biol, 36:1037–1051
Dutt V, Greenleaf JF (1994) Ultrasound echo envelope analysis using a homodyne K distribution signal model. Ultrason Imaging, 16:265–287
Dutt V, Greenleaf JF (1995) Speckle analysis using signal to noise ratios based on fractional order moments. Ultrason Imaging, 17:251–268
Faran JJ (1951) Sounds scattering by solid cylinders and spheres. J Acoust Soc Am, 23:405–418
Gerig A, Zagzebski J, Varchese T (2003) Statistics of ultrasonic scatterer size estimation with a reference phantom. J Acoust Soc Am, 113:3430–3437
Gerig AL, Varghese T, Zagzebski JA (2004) Improved parametric imaging of scatterer size estimates using angular compounding. IEEE Trans Ultrason, Ferroelect, Freq Contr, 51:708–715
Herd MT, Hall TJ, Jiang J, Zagzebski JA (2011) Improving the statistics of quantitative ultrasound techniques with deformation compounding: an experimental study. Ultrasound Med Biol, 37:2066–2074
Hruska DP (2009a) Improved techniques for statistical analysis of the envelope of backscattered ultrasound using the homodyne K distribution. M.S. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana
Hruska DP, Oelze ML (2009b) Improved parameter estimates based on the homodyne K distribution. IEEE Trans Ultrason, Ferroelect, Freq Contr, 56:2471–2481
Huisman HJ, Thijssen JM (1996) Precision and accuracy of acoustospectographic parameters. Ultrasound Med Biol, 22:855–871
Insana MF (1995) Modeling acoustic backscatter from kidney microstructure using and anisotropic correlation function. J Acoust Soc Am, 97:649–655
Insana MF, Hall TJ (1990a) Parametric ultrasound imaging from backscatter. Ultrason Imaging, 12:245–267
Insana MF, Wagner RF, Brown DG, Hall TJ (1990b) Describing small-scale structure in random media using pulse-echo ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am, 87:179–192
Lavarello RJ, Sanchez JR, Oelze ML (2008) Improving the quality of QUS imaging using full angular spatial compounding. In: Proceedings 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, pp 32–35
Lizzi FL, Ostromogilsky M, Feleppa EJ, Rorke MC, Yaremko MM (1987) Relationship of ultrasonic spectral parameters to features of tissue microstructure. IEEE Trans Ultrason, Ferroelect, Freq Contr, 34:319–329
Lizzi FL, Astor M, Feleppa EJ, Shao M, Kalisz A (1997a) Statistical framework for ultrasonic spectral parameter imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol, 23:1371–1382
Lizzi FL, Feleppa EJ, Astor M, Kalisz A (1997b) Statistics of ultrasonic spectral parameters for prostate and liver examinations. IEEE Trans Ultrson, Ferroelec, Freq Contr, 44:935–942
Lizzi FL, Alam SK, Mikaelian S, Lee P, Feleppa EJ (2006) On the statistics of ultrasonic spectral parameters. Ultrasound Med Biol, 32:1671–1685
Oelze ML, O’Brien Jr WD (2002) Method of improved scatterer size estimation and application Method of improved scatterer size estimation and application. J Acoust Soc Am, 112:3053–3063
Oelze ML, O’Brien Jr WD (2004a) Improved scatterer property estimates from ultrasound backscatter for small gate lengths using a gate-edge correction factor. J Acoust Soc Am, 116:3212–3223
Oelze ML, O’Brien Jr. WD (2004b) Defining optimal axial and lateral resolution for estimating scatterer properties from volumes using ultrasound backscatter. J Acoust Soc Am, 115:3226–3234
Oelze ML, Zachary JF, Obrien JR WD (2002) Characterization of tissue microstructure using ultrasonic backscatter: theory and technique for optimization using a Gaussian form factor. J Acoust Soc Am, 112:1202–1211
Papoulis A (1991) Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. Mcgraw-Hill, New York
Slepian J (1978) Prolate spheroidal wave-functions, Fourier-analysis, and uncertainty. V. The discrete case. Bell Syst Tech J, 57:1371–1430
Thomson DJ (2001) Multi-taper analysis of nonstationary and nonlinear. In: Fitzgerald R, Smith R, Walden A, Young P, Nonlinear and nonstationary signal processing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Welch PD (1967) The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust, 15:70–73
Weng L, Reid JM, Shankar PM, Soetanto K (1991) Ultrasound speckle analysis based on the K distribution. J Acoust Soc Am, 89:2992–2995
Wu L, Zagzebski JA (2010) Trade-offs in data acquisition and processing parameters for backscatter and scatterer size estimations. IEEE Trans Ultrason, Ferroelect, Freq Contr, 57:340–352
Yao LY, Zagzebski JA, Madsen EL (1991) Statistical uncertainty in ultrasonic backscatter and attenuation coefficients determined with a reference phantom. Ultrasound Med Biol, 17:187–194
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oelze, M.L. (2013). Statistics of Scatterer Property Estimates. In: Mamou, J., Oelze, M. (eds) Quantitative Ultrasound in Soft Tissues. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6952-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6952-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6951-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6952-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)