Advertisement

Geologic Displays as Science and Art

  • Marjorie A. Chan
Chapter
Part of the Innovations in Science Education and Technology book series (ISET, volume 20)

Abstract

Intriguing and innovative displays presenting geology as both science and art have profound power to teach, inspire, and engage students and visitors. In an academic geoscience building, example novel designs include an overall river theme relevant to the local physiography, museum-like displays of rock slabs and fossils, and eco-friendly installations that encourage sustainable practices. Positive outcomes include increased visitation, raised department visibility, more energized and enthusiastic faculty and students, a sense of pride and community, and donations to the educational mission. A changing focus from traditional architecture to integrated design elements can capitalize on visual materials to inspire the next generations of earth scientists. Geologic displays as science and art have a rejuvenating effect on the academic endeavors of teaching and research and leave a legacy that extends beyond traditional walls.

Keywords

Earth Science Rock Slab Campus Building Wonderful Diversity Academic Building 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to the design team that helped instill and develop innovative displays: John Diamond (NCARB) and Lee Phillips-Diamond, principals of Diamond Phillips. Their creativeness was key in developing many concepts of an experiential environment. I thank the following individuals who were instrumental in the display process and planning: Desslie Andreason, Erich Petersen, Tony Ekdale, Barbara Nash, Kris Pankow, Bill Johnson, and Matt Heumann. Many other Department of Geology and Geophysics faculty and students at the University of Utah also were key at many steps of the process. Frank Brown, Dean of the College of Mines and Earth Science, was the ultimate overseer and leader of the Sutton building construction and its budget. John C. McNary, Director of Campus Planning at the University of Utah, and his architectural staff were key supporters in catching and implementing the vision for applying this design approach campus wide. M. Dane Picard and two anonymous reviewers provided constructive comments and editing for this chapter.

References

  1. AGI – American Geological Institute. (2004). Why earth science? www.agiweb.org/education/WhyEarthScience/Why_Earth_Science.pdf
  2. Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88, S17–S33. doi: 10.1002/sce.20016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barstow, D., Geary, E., & Yazijian, H. (Eds.). (2002). Blueprint for change: Report from the national conference on the revolution in earth and space science education. Cambridge: TERC, 100 pp. www.earthscienceedrevolution.org/recommend/informaled.cfm
  4. Bralower, T., Feiss, P. G., & Manduca, C. A. (2008). Preparing a new generation of citizens and scientists to face Earth’s future. Liberal Education, 94(2), 20–23.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, M. A. (1993). Artwork and creative drawing – tools for learning and geologic synthesis. Journal of Geological Education, 41, 222–225.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, M. A. (2010). Innovations in the built environment for Earth sciences. GSA Today, 20, 52–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, M. A., & Hatch, A. (2011). Smartphone and podcast applications to expand the educational environment. Geological Society of America annual meeting, Minneapolis. Abstract 46–14.Google Scholar
  8. Chan, M. A., Diamond, J. D., & McNary, J. C. (2011). The experiential environment: A new paradigm in campus design. Society for campus and university planners SCUP-46 annual meetingIntegrated solutions to campus planning: How and now! Abstract SCUP 46C044.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, M. A., Main, E., & McNary, J. C. (2012). The transformative educational experience: A new building paradigm for higher education campuses. Society of Campus and University Planners, 41(1), online journal.Google Scholar
  10. Flexer, B. K., & Borun, M. (1984). The impact of a class visit to a participatory science museum exhibit and a classroom science lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 863–873. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660210902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, B. (2009). Geology inspires his artistic visions: AAPG Explorer web story. www.aapg.org/explorer/2009/06jun/art0609.cfm
  12. Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2007). Museums and education: Purpose, pedagogy, performance. London: Taylor Francis Ltd. 238 p.Google Scholar
  13. Kelly, P. H., & Burks, R. J. (2004). The importance of teaching earth science in schools. GSA position statement, geological society of America. www.geosociety.org/positions/pos4_publicSchools.pdf
  14. Knez, I., & Kers, C. (2000). Effects of indoor lighting, gender, and age on mood and cognitive performance. Environment and Behavior, 32, 817–831.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, E. B. (2008). Content is not enough: A history of secondary Earth science teacher preparation with recommendations for today. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56, 445–455. nagt.org/files/nagt/jge/abstracts/jge_nov2008_lewis_445.pdf
  16. Manduca, C., Macdonald, H., & Feiss, G. (2008). Education: Preparing students for geosciences of the future. Geotimes, 53(4), 59.Google Scholar
  17. National Science Foundation Earth Science Literacy Initiative (ESLI). (2010). www.earthscienceliteracy.org/
  18. NESTA – National Earth Science Teachers Association. (1987). The importance of Earth Science Education K-12. nestanet.org/cms/content/policy/nestaposition#imp
  19. Newsham, G., Brand, J., Donnelly, C., Veitch, J., Aries, M., & Charles, K. (2009). Linking indoor environment conditions to job satisfaction: A field study. Building Research & Information, 37, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Packer, J. (2008). Beyond learning: Exploring visitors’ perceptions of the value and benefits of museum experiences. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51, 33–54. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2008.tb00293.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramey-Gassert, L., Walberg, H. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Reexamining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78, 345–363. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730780403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rosenberg, G. D. (1997). A lesson in plate tectonics from art. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45, 137–146.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenberg, G. D. (1998). Art and the Earth sciences: Activities integrating art and geology. Bloomington: Tichenor Publishing. 50 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenberg, G. D. (2000). Making space for art in the earth sciences. Journal of Geoscience Education, 48, 273–275.Google Scholar
  25. Seilacher, A. (1997). Fossil art: An exhibition of the Geologisches Institut, Tuebingen University, Germany. Drumheller: Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology. 64 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Springer, D. A., Alvarez, F., Carlson, S. J., & MacKinnon, D. (1997). Paleontology in the 21st century. Report from International Senckenger Conference and Workshop, Frankfurt. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/hosted_sites/paleonet/paleo21/rr/hre.html
  27. Talboys, G. K. (2010). Using museums as an educational resource. Farnham: Ashgate. 194 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Tobisch, O. T. (1983). Connections between the geological sciences and visual art. www.jstor.org/stable/1574953
  29. UNESCO. (2008). Year of the planet Earth. www.yearofplanetearth.org
  30. Vance, M., & Deacon, D. (1977). Think out of the box. Franklin Lakes: Career Press. 216 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeophysicsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations