Advertisement

Incorporating Research into Teaching Geosciences: The Masters Student Perspective

  • Barbara McNutt
Chapter
Part of the Innovations in Science Education and Technology book series (ISET, volume 20)

Abstract

A Masters student in the geosciences shares her perspectives and views based on personal experience and the experiences of student peers about the incorporation of research into teaching. Including research publications like journal articles, and research projects in which students can participate, into the structure of courses, has positive impacts on student engagement and on learning outcomes. Reported learning outcomes attained as a result of incorporating research into teaching ranged from learning the techniques of scientific inquiry and gaining a better grasp and better knowledge of the subject matter to exploring the role of researcher as a potential career. Research articles included in their courses forge a link between what students learn and how such learning is obtained through conducting research. The article also considers instances where lecturers do not incorporate research into teaching and what students think about why this might not be done. The standard status quo of teaching practice in the geosciences and the challenges that the research-teaching nexus pose to it are considered as well as how these challenges can and have been addressed.

Keywords

Field Trip Master Student Dune Field White Sand Positive Learning Outcome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Prof. Douglas Jerolmack for letting me tell the world about Advanced Earth Surface Processes and for the ways that he incorporated his research and involved students in the research process for this course. I would also like to thank Prof. Ilya Buynevich, Dr. Raleigh Martin, and Ms. Mengdan Jiang.

References

  1. Abdal-Haqq, I. (1998). Constructivism in teacher education: Consideration for those who would link practice to theory. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. ERIC Document reproduction service No. ED46986. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED426986. Retrieved May 18, 2012.
  2. Chang, H. (2005). Turning an undergraduate class into a professional research community. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(3), 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Erickson, R. A. (2001). Why involve students in research? Innovations in undergraduate research and honors education. In: Proceedings of the second Schreyer National conference 2001. Paper 10. Retrieved May 15, 2012, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcschreyer2/10
  4. Guertin, L. (2011). Voices of undergraduate geoscience research website. Geosciences Division of the Council on Undergraduate Research. Retrieved May 18, 2012, from http://www.personal.psu.edu/uxg3/blogs/geocurvoices/. Accessed 10 Oct 2011.
  5. Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenkins, A. (2000). The relationship between teaching and research: Where does geography stand and deliver? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(3), 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Justice, J., Inglis, S., Miller, S., & Sammon, S. (2007). Inquiry in higher education: reflections and directions on course design and teaching methods. Innovative Higher Education, 31(4), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Minner, D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction – What is it and does it matter? Results from a research thesis, years 1984-2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 447–496. doi: 10.1002/tea.20347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Reitz, M., Jerolmack, D., Ewing, R., & Martin, R. (2010). Barchan-parabolic dune pattern transition from vegetation stability threshold. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, L19402. doi:10.1029/2010GL044957.Google Scholar
  12. Spronken-Smith, R., Bullard, J., Ray, W., Roberts, C., & Keiffer, A. (2009). Where might sand dunes be on Mars? Engaging students through inquiry-based learning in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 71–86. January 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental ScienceUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations