Advertisement

Supporting the Transition from Geoscience Student to Researcher Through Classroom Investigations Using Remotely Operable Analytical Instruments

  • Jeffrey G. Ryan
Chapter
Part of the Innovations in Science Education and Technology book series (ISET, volume 20)

Abstract

Bringing research training activities into the classroom through course-related uses of research instrumentation is a widely used strategy for improving student engagement, retention, and learning in undergraduate science courses. However, such strategies present a range of logistical challenges in terms of instrument access for a large number of students, the time commitment involved in learning instrument use, and in ensuring a sufficient level of exposure for students such that the experience can actually help develop key technical and intellectual skills. I have sought to minimize the logistical challenges of classroom instrument use through integrating remotely operable instruments (electron microprobe and scanning electron microscope) into course activities in a junior-level geology majors course and an introductory-level science course for non-majors. Our outcomes to date point to increased student interest in course materials and activities due to their hands-on instrumentation experiences. Geology majors showed an increased willingness to undertake and complete mentored undergraduate research projects. Non-majors showed no greater inclination to undertake further science courses and research experiences, an outcome that may be partly related to the constraints of their selected degree curricula.

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2004). Invention and impact: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Proceedings of the 2004 CCLI Conference. http://www.aaas.org/publications/books_reports/CCLI/
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2008). Invention and impact 2: Building excellence in undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Proceedings of the 2008 CCLI Conference. http://ccliconference.org/files/2010/10/Invention_Impact2.pdf
  3. American Chemical Society. (2012). ACS guidelines for bachelors degree programs. http://portal.acs.org/portal/PublicWebSite/about/governance/committees/training/acsapproved/degreeprogram/WPCP_008491
  4. Beane, R. (2004). Using the scanning electron microscope for discovery based learning in undergraduate courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 52, 250–253.Google Scholar
  5. CCLI and TUES Awards by State. (2009). http://ccliconference.org/nsf-ccli-awards-by-state/
  6. Collins, N., & Ryan J. G. (2009). Petrogenesis of amphibolite blocks from the Tatham’s Creek/Savannah Church area, North Carolina Blue Ridge. GSA Southeastern Section Meeting Abstracts with Programs, v. 41.Google Scholar
  7. Dewitt, A., Dueben, B., Peterson, V. L., & Ryan J. G. (2008). Testing the chemical fingerprint of amphibolites from the central Blue Ridge Cartoogechaye and Mars Hill terranes, NC Blue Ridge. GSA Southeastern Section Meeting Abstracts with Programs, v. 40.Google Scholar
  8. Donovan, J., & Ryan, J. G. (2009). Using mineralogy and mineral chemistry to correlate mafic rock units in the southern Blue Ridge. GSA Southeastern Section Meeting Abstracts with Programs, v. 41.Google Scholar
  9. Florida Center for Analytical Electron Microscopy (2013). http://www2.fiu.edu/~emlab/home.html
  10. Fryar, A. E., Thompson, K. E., Hendricks, S. P., & White, D. S. (2010). Incorporating a watershed-based summary field exercise into an introductory hydrogeology course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 214–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geology Field Camps/Field Courses by 80+ Schools. (2012). http://geology.com/field-camp.shtml
  12. Glenn, D. (2010). Divided attention: In an age of classroom multitasking, scholars probe the nature of learning and memory. The Chronicle of Higher Education, online version, http://chronicle.com/article/Scholars-Turn-Their-Attention/63746/
  13. Gonzales, D., & Semken, S. (2006). Integrating undergraduate education and scientific discovery through field research in igneous petrology. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 133–142.Google Scholar
  14. Guertin, L. A. (2006). Integrating handheld technology with field investigations in introductory-level geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 143–146.Google Scholar
  15. Holmes, S., Kolb, U., Haswell, C. A., Burwitz, V., Lucas, R. J., Rodriguez, J., Rolfe, S. M., Rostron, J., & Barker, J. (2011). PIRATE: A remotely operable telescope facility for research and education. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 123, 1177–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joseph, M., & Ryan, J. G. (2010). Metamorphic history and assemblages of matrix rocks in the Cullowhee olistostromal terrane. GSA NE/SE Section Meeting, Abstracts with Programs, v. 42, p. 76.Google Scholar
  17. King, E. M. (2006). Studio classrooms and student centered learning in traditional microscopy courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 476–479.Google Scholar
  18. King, E. M. (2007). Integrating cathodoluminescence into an undergraduate geology curriculum. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55, 426–433.Google Scholar
  19. Klute, R., & Ryan, J. G. (2008). Genesis of Fe-Al-Si rich “pink horizons” in Buck Creek amphibolites at Glade Gap, NC. 2008 GSA Southeastern Section Meeting Abstracts with Programs, v. 40.Google Scholar
  20. Libarkin, J. C., & Anderson, S. W. (2005). Assessment of learning in entry-level geoscience courses: Results from the geoscience concept inventory. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 394–401.Google Scholar
  21. Lord, M., Peterson, V., & Vandervoort, K. (2003). Integrating investigation across the geology and physics curricula using the Cullowhee Creek environmental field station, Western Carolina University. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51, 415–423.Google Scholar
  22. McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., Owens, K. D., Knott, J. R., Van Horn, S., Borowski, W., Dick, J., Foos, A., Malone, M., McGrew, H., Greer, L., & Heaney, P. J. (2006). Using conceptests to assess and improve student conceptual understanding in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54, 61–68.Google Scholar
  23. Noll, M. R. (2003). Building bridges between field and laboratory studies in an undergraduate groundwater course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51, 231–236.Google Scholar
  24. Pearce, A. R., Bierman, P. R., Druschel, G. K., Massey, C., Rizzo, D. M., Watzin, M. C., & Wemple, B. C. (2010). Pitfalls and successes of developing an interdisciplinary watershed field science course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perkins, D. (2006). The case for a cooperative studio classroom: Teaching petrology in a different way. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 101–109.Google Scholar
  26. Petcovic, H., & Libarkin, J. (2007). Research in science education: The expert-novice continuum. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55, 333–339.Google Scholar
  27. Peterson, V. L., Ryan, J. G., Yurkovich, S. P.,Kruse, S. E., & Burr, J. (2003). A collaborative field-laboratory summer Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) program in geosciences. CUR Quarterly, 23, 5–9.Google Scholar
  28. Peterson, V., Lord, M., & Vandervoort, K. (2007). Establishment of an investigative curricular approach across the Geology and Physics Programs at Western Carolina University, and implementation at other institutions. In K. Karukstis & T. Elgren (Eds.), Developing and sustaining a research supportive curriculum: A compendium of successful practices (pp. 425–448). Washington, DC: Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
  29. Ryan, J. G. (2010). An in-class demonstration and activity using the FCAEM remotely operable electron microprobe. Part of the “Teaching Geochemistry in the 21st Century” online collection. Science Education Resource Center. http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/geochemistry/activities/46409.html
  30. Space Telescope Science Institute Portal. (2012). http://www.stsci.edu/portal/
  31. Woltemade, C. J., & Blewett, W. L. (2002). Design, implementation and assessment of an undergraduate interdisciplinary watershed research laboratory. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50, 372–379.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations