Advertisement

Using Research to Promote Action in Earth Science Professional Development for Teachers

  • Chris King
Chapter
Part of the Innovations in Science Education and Technology book series (ISET, volume 21)

Abstract

This chapter shows how research has underpinned the development of the Earth Science Education Unit’s professional development initiative at all stages, by indicating its necessity, effectiveness and success.

The necessity has been shown by the following:
  • Pre-ESEU research showing the poor educational backgrounds of the science teachers teaching the Earth science component of the National Curriculum for Science, their dependence on science textbooks written for pupils and on their colleagues, the lack of practical, investigational and field activities in their teaching and their low usage of Earth science materials and professional development

  • Pre-ESEU research into problems with the Earth science content of syllabuses and examinations

  • Textbook analysis, showing the poor quality of many of the textbooks used by science teachers

  • Misconception analysis, showing the wide range of misconception in the system

The effectiveness has been illustrated by the following:
  • High level of post-workshop evaluation maintained throughout the initiative

  • Research demonstrating the impact of ESEU workshops on teaching in schools

The success has been indicated by the following:
  • Large numbers of teachers and trainee teachers who have participated in ESEU workshops across the UK

  • Increasing take-up of ESEU workshops by teacher education institutions across the country

  • Continuing support and encouragement of ESEU by the oil industry through its unique industry/education partnership in maintaining the little gem

This research around necessity, effectiveness and success has enabled ESEU to develop guidance for others planning to develop similar initiatives elsewhere in the world.

Keywords

Professional Development Science Teacher Earth Science National Curriculum Continue Professional Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am most grateful to Annette Thomas of Oil & Gas UK and Malcolm Webb, Chief Executive of Oil & Gas UK, for their long-term financial and business support. I am also very grateful to Peter Kennett for co-running the pilot ESEU; to Bernadette Callan for managing ESEU for much of its history; to the successive Chairs of the ESEU Steering Committees, Martin Whitely and Steve Harris and to all the ESEU facilitators and members of the Central Team at Keele, past and present, who have supported the ESEU so strongly over many years.

References

  1. Adey, P. (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, R. (1996). Lies, damn lies and books on geology. In D. A. V. Stow & G. J. H. McCall (Eds.), Geoscience education and training. In schools and universities, for industry and public awareness (pp. 289–291). Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
  3. Council for Science and Technology (CST). (2000). Science teachers: A report on supporting and developing the profession of science teaching in primary and secondary schools. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  4. Earthlearningidea. website: http://www.earthlearningidea.com. Last accessed 12 June 2013.
  5. Fisher, J. A. (1992). Geology: Earth science – Or is it geography? School Science Review, 73, 141–145.Google Scholar
  6. Joint Earth Science Education Initiative (JESEI). website: http://www.esta-uk.net/jesei/index.htm. Last accessed 16 May 2013.
  7. Kennett, P., & King, C. (1998). ‘Science of the Earth’ – Past and present. Teaching Earth Sciences, 23, 135–139.Google Scholar
  8. King, C. (2000). The Earth’s mantle is solid: Teachers’ misconceptions about the Earth and plate tectonics. School Science Review, 82(2000), 57–64.Google Scholar
  9. King, C. (2001). The response of teachers to new content in a National Science Curriculum: The case of the Earth-science component. Science Education, 85, 636–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. King, C. (2008). Geoscience education: An overview. Studies in Science Education, 44, 187–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. King, C. (2009, October 26–31). Supporting geoscience education. Abstract volume, International Conference, Geoscience for Global Development, p. 17.Google Scholar
  12. King, C. (2010a). An analysis of misconceptions in science textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 565–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. King, C. (2010b). Earthlearningidea – using the internet to bring practical Earth learning ideas to the world (plenary address) abstract. Abstracts of the 6th quadrennial conference of the international geoscience education organisation. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
  14. King, C. (2011). Taking Earth science education to science teachers – ESEU, the first ten years. 216.1. T176 Innovative methods for broadening participation in the geosciences through in-service professional development. 2011 GSA annual meeting and exposition; abstracts with programmes (CD-ROM) 43.5.Google Scholar
  15. King, C., & Hughes, E. (2007). Comparisons of the Earth science-related content of GCSE science specifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (p. 27, Internal report). Keele: The Earth Science Education Unit, Keele University.Google Scholar
  16. King, C., & Hughes, E. (2008). Which science specification should you choose for its Earth science content? Teaching Earth Sciences, 33(1), 31–36.Google Scholar
  17. King, C., Brooks, M., Gill, R., Rhodes, A., & Thompson, D. (1998). A comparison of GCSE double award science syllabuses and exams for their Earth science content, accuracy and level of demand (Internal report). London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
  18. King, C., Brooks, M., Gill, R., Rhodes, A., & Thompson, D. (1999). Earth science in GCSE science syllabuses and examinations. School Science Review, 80, 87–93.Google Scholar
  19. King, C., Fleming, A., Kennett, P., & Thompson, D. (2002). A report on the Earth science content of commonly used Secondary Science Textbooks (p. 101, Internal report). Keele: The Earth Science Education Unit, Keele University.Google Scholar
  20. King, C., Fleming, A., Kennett, P., & Thompson, D. (2003). Can you believe everything you read? What some science textbooks say about Earth Science. Teaching Earth Sciences, 28(2), 8–13.Google Scholar
  21. King, C., Edwards, N., & Hughes, E. (2004). Earth science in GCSE double award science specifications (p. 12, Internal report). Keele: The Earth Science Education Unit, Keele University.Google Scholar
  22. King, C., Fleming, A., Kennett, P., & Thompson, D. (2005). How effectively do science textbooks teach Earth science? School Science Review, 87(318), 95–104.Google Scholar
  23. King, C., Kennett, P., & Devon, E. (2013). Earthlearningidea: A worldwide web-based resource of simple but effective teaching activities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lock, R., Salt, D., & Soares, A. (2011a). ITT science tutor questionnaire. Unpublished research for the Wellcome Trust, accessed from: http://www.rogerlock.novawebs.co.uk/WorkingDocuments.html. Last accessed 16 May 2013.
  25. Lock, R., Salt, D., & Soares, A. (2011b). ITT science documentation survey. Unpublished research for the Wellcome Trust. Accessed from: http://www.rogerlock.novawebs.co.uk/WorkingDocuments.html. Last accessed 16 May 2013.
  26. Lydon, S., & King, C. (2009). Can a single, short CPD workshop cause change in the classroom? Professional Development in Education, 35(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (with Olson, J. F., Erberber, E., Preuschoff, C., & Galia, J.) (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report: Findings from IEAs trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and Eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earth Science Education UnitKeele UniversityKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations