Using Guided Inquiry Tools with Online Geosciences Data from the Great Lakes

  • Sandra RutherfordEmail author
Part of the Innovations in Science Education and Technology book series (ISET, volume 21)


All major science education reform documents call for a shift from traditional structured lessons to more inquiry-based instruction in science classrooms. This shift requires teachers to generate new methods to present students with the opportunity to engage in scientific experiences through observations and data analysis. One approach is to use inquiry-based activities with online research. To ensure that teachers have the data necessary to conduct investigations, a website entitled Teaching with Great Lakes Data was developed. Given the emphasis on incorporating more inquiry-based instruction into science classrooms, the Virtual Vee Map guided inquiry tool is used.

This Virtual Vee Map is used in two small studies, using the data from the Teaching with Great Lakes Data website. One study is with 7th grade students and the other is with pre-service elementary teachers. Both studies intended to expose these two groups to authentic opportunities to develop their scientific inquiry skills. However, the pre-service elementary teachers and the 7th grade students both struggled with writing a testable question, with using technology, and with constructing graphs and other mathematics. Consequently, using real data in the classroom faces real challenges for both teachers and researchers intending to make their data available for use by teachers and their students. Other methods are suggested to support the infusion of online data use into science classrooms.


Great Lake Science Classroom Elementary Teacher Testable Question Common Core State Standard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Geological Institute. (2009). Status of the geoscience workforce: Report summary. Accessed 30 Sept 2011.
  3. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Barstow, D., & Geary, E. (2001). Blueprint for change: Report from the national conference on the revolution in Earth and Space Science Education. TERC 100 p.Google Scholar
  5. Beiser, A., & Krauskopf, K. B. (2006). The physical universe (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (October 2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, T. (September 2011). Earth science puzzles: Book review. The Science Teacher, 78(6), 77.Google Scholar
  8. Burrowes, P. A. (April 2007). How to make a field trip a hands-on investigative laboratory: Learning about marine invertebrates. The American Biology Teacher, 69(4), 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coffman, M., & Riggs, L. (September 2006). The virtual Vee Map: A template for internet inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(1), 32–39.Google Scholar
  10. Colburn, A. (March 2000). An inquiry primer. Science Scope, 23(6), 42–44.Google Scholar
  11. Common Core. (2011). Common core state standards initiative: Preparing America’s students for college and career. Accessed 22 Oct 2011.
  12. Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2009). Habits of mind across the curriculum: Practical and creative strategies for teachers. Alexandria: ASCD.Google Scholar
  13. Earth Science Literacy Initiative. (2010). Earth science literacy principles. Accessed 30 Sept. 2011.
  14. Eick, C., Meadows, L., & Balkcom, R. (October 2005). Breaking into inquiry: Scaffolding supports beginning efforts to implement inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 49–53.Google Scholar
  15. Ellwein, A., Nyman, M. W., Connealy, S., Strong, M., & Daniel, M. J. (2011, October 9–12). Investigating and improving the science and data literacy of pre-service elementary educators. GSA Annual Meeting and Exposition, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  16. Flannagan, J. S., & McMillan, R. (February 2009). From cookbook to experimental design. Science and Children, 46(6), 46–50.Google Scholar
  17. Graves, C., & Rutherford, S. (2012). Writing a scientific research (“testable”) question. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 46–51.Google Scholar
  18. Great Schools Inc. (2011). Adrian middle school 7/8 building. Accessed 4 Jan 2012.
  19. Hoffman, M., & Barstow, D. (2007). Revolutionizing earth system science education for the 21st century: Report and recommendations from a 50-state analysis of Earth Science Education Standards. TERC Center for Earth and Space Science Education. Accessed 15 Aug 2011.
  20. Kastens, K., & Turrin, M. (2010). Earth science puzzles: Making meaning from data. Arlington: NSTA Press. 186 p.Google Scholar
  21. Keeling, E. L., Polacek, K. M., & Ingram, E. L. (2009). A statistical analysis of student questions in a cell biology laboratory. CBE Life Sciences Education, 8, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ledley, T. S., Manduca, C. A., & Fox, S. (2008). Recommendations for making geoscience data accessible and usable in education. Eos, 89(32), 291–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manduca, C. A., & Mogk, D. (2002, April). Using data in undergraduate science classrooms: Final report on an interdisciplinary workshop at Carleton College. Natl. Sci. Digital Libr. Accessed 22 Oct 2011.
  24. Manduca, C. A., & Mogk, D. W. (2003). Using data in undergraduate classrooms. Northfield, MN, Science Education Resource Center, Carleton College: 36. data/report.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2011.
  25. Manduca, C., Mogk, D., & Stillings, N. (2002). Bringing research on learning to the geosciences. Report from a workshop sponsored by the National Science Foundation and the Johnson Foundation. Accessed 15 Aug 2011.
  26. Marbach-Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Good science begins with good questions: Answering the need for high-level questions in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 192–195.Google Scholar
  27. Melear, C. T., Goodlaxson, J. D., Warne, T. R., & Hickok, L. G. (2000). Teaching preservice science teachers how to do science: Responses to the research experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(1), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Michigan Sea Grant. (2010). Teaching with Great Lakes data. Accessed 11 June 2010.
  29. Morgan, E. E., & Hiebert, L. S. (December 2010). Ready…set…go! Science and Children, 48(4), 40–45.Google Scholar
  30. Mugaloglu, E., & Saribas, D. (2010). Pre-service science teachers’ competence to design an inquiry based lab lesson. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4255–4259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Geographic Society. (2004). Ocean literacy: The essential principles of ocean sciences K-12. Accessed 22 Oct 2011.
  32. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  33. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core idea (p. 282p). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  35. Next Generation Science Standards. (2011). Accessed 22 Oct 2011.
  36. NYSED. (2011). Office of assessment policy, development and administration. Accessed 22 Oct 2011.
  37. Ohio Sea Grant. (2010). Great lakes literacy: Essential principles and fundamental concepts for great lakes learning. Accessed 22 Oct 2011.
  38. Roehrig, G., Luft, J. A., & Edwards, M. (2001). Versatile Vee Maps. The Science Teacher, 68(1), 28–31.Google Scholar
  39. Seaman, C. E., & Szydlik, J. E. (2007). Mathematical sophistication among preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 167–182. doi: 10.1007/s10857-007-9033-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swenson, S., & Kastens, K. (2011). Student interpretation of a global elevation map: What it is, how it was made, and what is useful for. In A. D. Feig & A. Stokes (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in geoscience education research (Geological society of America special paper 474, pp. 189–211). doi: 10.1130/2011.2474(13).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Szyjka, S., Mumba, F., & Wise, K. C. (2011). Cognitive and attitudinal predictors related to line graphing achievement among elementary pre-service teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 563–578. doi: 10.1007/s10972-010-9207-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. U.S. Global Change Research Program/Climate Change Science Program. (2009). Climate literacy: The essential principles of climate sciences. Accessed 22 Oct 2011.
  43. Wilen, W. W. (1991). Questioning skills, for teachers (p. 40p). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.Google Scholar
  44. Zalles, D., Gobert, J., Quellmatz, E., & Pallant, A. (2007). Data sets and inquiry in geoscience education: Final report. Accessed 22 Oct 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wisconsin Center for Education ResearchUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations