Abstract
As part of the EARTHTIME outreach initiative, we have developed an educational module that teaches students about the basics of geochronology and how geologic time is measured. The exercises focus on the uranium-lead (U-Pb) dating method using the mineral zircon with applications to solving geological problems. During several Lab Day tutorials, students from local high schools attended a day of workshops, participating in hands-on exercises and a discussion of geochronology in earth science research. Student performance and learning impact were assessed using pre-tests (1 week before the event) and two post-tests (1 week after the event and 4 months after the event). These revealed that students greatly appreciated the hands-on exercises and that the exercises resulted in a significant increase in knowledge. We also developed and tested a “Lab Day on the road,” where scientists traveled to a local high school to introduce hands-on exercises and lead discussions related to geochronology. To further develop the module, a teacher workshop was conducted to identify educators’ needs and perspectives. The teaching methods, developed iteratively during 2 years of Lab Days, were incorporated in a Geochronology Lesson Plan and Material Kit. The finalized lesson plan is a 90- to 120-min educational module, downloadable at http://www.earth-time.org/Lesson_Plan.pdf, along with supporting spreadsheets and a video demonstration of the material. An EARTHTIME geochronology kit, linked to the lesson plan activities, is available by request to K-12 teachers in the USA.
Keywords
- Lesson Plan
- Radioactive Decay
- Geologic Time
- Teaching Module
- Educational Module
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2009). http://www.project2061.org/research/assessment.htm
American Geophysical Union. (1994). Report of the AGU Chapman conference on scrutiny of undergraduate geoscience education, 55 p.
Ault, C. R. (1982). Time in geological explanations as perceived by elementary school students. Journal of Geological Education, 30, 304–309.
Clary, R. M., Brzuszek, R. F., & Wandersee, J. H. (2009). Students’ geocognition of deep time, conceptualized in an informal educational setting. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(4), 275–285.
Dean, D. R. (1981). The age of the earth controversy: Beginnings to Hutton. Annals of Science, 38(4), 435–456.
DeLaughter, J. E., Stein, S., Stein, C., & Bain, K. (1998). Preconceptions about Earth science among students in an introductory course. Eos, 79, 429–432.
Dodick, J., & Orion, N. (2003). Measuring student understanding of geological time. Science Education, 87(5), 708–731.
Earth Science Literacy Initiative (ESLI). (2009). www.earthscienceliteracy.org/
Gorst, M. (2001). Measuring eternity. The search for the beginning of time. New York: Broadway. 352 pages.
Gosselin, D., Levy, R., & Bonnstetter, R. (2003). Using earth science research projects to develop collaboration between scientists at a research university and K-12 educators: Insights for future efforts. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 114–120.
Gould, S. J. (1987). Time’s arrow, time’s cycle: Myth and metaphor in the discovery of geologic time. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Haber, F. C. (1959). The age of the world. Moses to Darwin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16, 13–16.
Hutton, J. (1788). Theory of the Earth. Transaction of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, I(Part II), 209–304. http://www.uwmc.uwc.edu/geography/hutton/hutton.htm
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
Lederman, N., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of the tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74, 225–239.
Libarkin, J. C., Kurdziel, J. P., & Anderson, S. W. (2007). College student conceptions of geo-logical time and the disconnect between ordering and scale. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55, 413–422.
Lyell, C. (1830). Principles of geology, being an attempt to explain the former changes of the Earth’s surface, by reference to causes now in operation. London: John Murray. Volume 1–3.
Mayer, V. J. (1991a). Earth-system science: A planetary perspective. The Science Teacher, 58(1), 31–36.
Mayer, V. J. (1991b). Framework for Earth systems education. Science Activities, 28(1), 8–9.
McPhee, J. (1981). Basin and range (229 p.). New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.). (1998). Teaching science for understanding. A human constructivist view. San Diego: Academic.
National Research Council. (1997). Science teaching reconsidered. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 88 p.
National Science Board. (2002). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington: National Science Foundation.
National Science Board. (2003). The science and engineering workforce: Realizing America’s potential. Arlington: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), National Science Foundation. http://www.nsta.org/
National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Arlington: National Science Foundation. 76 p.
Patterson, C., Tilton, G., & Inghram, M. (1955). Age of the Earth. Science, 121, 69–75.
Philips, W. (1991). Earth science misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 58(2), 21–23.
Piaget, J. (1967). Logique et Connaissance scientifique (Logic and scientific knowledge). Paris: Encyclopédie de la Pléiade.
Rudwick, M. J. S. (1992). Scenes from deep time (294 p.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403–418.
Trend, R. (2001). Deep time framework: A preliminary study of UK primary teachers’ conceptions of geological time and perceptions of geoscience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 191–221.
Trend, R. (2002). Developing the concept of deep time. In V. J. Mayer (Ed.), Global science literacy (pp. 187–202). Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Jessica Creveling, Stacia Gordon, and Christy Till for helping with the Lab Day programs. We very much appreciate the help of all the participating students and teachers, especially Rita Chang from Wellesley High School, Massachusetts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bookhagen, B., McLean, N., Buchwaldt, R., Rioux, M., Dudás, F., Bowring, S. (2014). EARTHTIME: Teaching Geochronology to High School Students in the USA. In: Tong, V. (eds) Geoscience Research and Outreach. Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6943-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6943-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6942-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6943-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)