Teaching and Learning in a Community of Thinking: The Context

  • Yoram Harpaz


Ideas can be situated in various contexts, and each context gives them a different meaning (for meaning, as we know, is in the context). In this chapter I will locate the framework of teaching and learning in a community of thinking within a broad context, within a complex of ideas that will give it a deeper meaning. I will place the idea of the community of thinking in three contexts, called the third model, the third approach, and the third drive. Actually, the third model, the third approach, and the third drive are the general rule, of which the community of thinking is only one example.


Critical Thinking Thinking Skill Knowledge Building Instructional System Joint Intention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barber, M. (1997). The learning game: Argument for an education revolution. Great Britain: Indigo.Google Scholar
  2. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Bereiter, C., Scardamalia, M., Cassells, C., & Hewitt, J. (1997). Postmodernism, knowledge building, and elementary science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyer, B. (1988). Developing a thinking skills program. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Boix-Mansilla, V., & Gardner, H. (1998). What are the qualities of understanding? In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 161–196). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, A. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environment: On procedures, principles, and system. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah: Lawrence Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, A. (1991). The school as a home for the mind. Palatine: IRI/Skylight Training and Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, A. (Ed.). (2001). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd ed.). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  11. De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: Creativity step by step. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duckworth, E. (1996). “The having of wonderful ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind: How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egan, K. (1999). “Letting our presuppositions think for us” idem. In Children’s minds, talking rabbits and clockwork oranges (pp. 71–84). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Egan, K. (2002). Getting it wrong from the beginning: Our progressivist inheritance from Herbert Spencer, John Dewey, and Jean Piaget. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ennis, R. (1962). A concept of critical thinking. Harvard Educational Review, xxxii(1), 81–111. Winter.Google Scholar
  19. Fenstermacher, G., & Soltis, J. (1986). Approaches to teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fisher, R. (1990). Teaching children to think. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.Google Scholar
  21. Gatto, J. (2002). Dumbing us down: The hidden curriculum of compulsory schooling. Gabriola Island: New Society.Google Scholar
  22. Giroux, H., & McLaren, P. (Eds.). (1989). Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Harpaz, Y. (2000). Complementary approaches to teaching thinking: David Perkins on good thinking. In Y. Harpaz (Ed.), The landscapes of mind: David Perkins and colleagues on teaching thinking (pp. XI–LVII). Jerusalem: Branco Weiss Institute for the Development of Thinking (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  24. Harpaz, Y. (2005). The hook, the bait, and the fish: Approaches to teaching thinking. Jerusalem: Branco Weiss Institute for the Development of Thinking (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  25. Harpaz, Y. (2010). Conflicting logics in teaching for critical thinking. Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, XXV(2), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohlberg, L., & Mayer, R. (1972). Development as the aim of education. Harvard Educational Review, 42(4), 449–496.Google Scholar
  27. Kohn, A. (1999). The schools our children deserve: Moving beyond traditional classrooms and “Tougher Standards”. Boston: Houghton Miflin Company.Google Scholar
  28. Lamm, Z. (1976). Conflicting theories of instruction: Conceptual dimensions. Berkeley: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  29. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Marzano, R., Brandt, R., Hughes, C., Jones, B., Presseisen, B., Rankin, S., & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  31. McPeck, J. (1981). Critical thinking and education. New York: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  32. Olson, D. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Passmore, John. (1980). Teaching to be critical. in idem, The philosophy of teaching (pp. 166–182). London: Duckworth, Ch. 9.Google Scholar
  34. Perkins, D. N. (1995). Outsmarting IQ: The emerging science of learnable intelligence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Perkins, D. N. (1998). What is understanding. In M. S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding (pp. 39–57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Perkins, D. N., & Swartz, R. (1991). The nine basics of teaching thinking. In A. Costa, J. Bellanca, & R. Fogatry (Eds.), If minds matter: A forward to the future (Vol. II, pp. 53–69). Palatine: Skylight Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
  38. Reid, S. (2002). How to think: Building your mental muscle. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Rogoff, B., Matusov, E., & White, C. (1996). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 388–414). New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1996). Learning in wonderland: What do computers really offer education? In K. Stephen (Ed.), Technology and the future of schooling: Ninety-fifth yearbook of the national society for the study of education (pp. 111–130). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  42. Scheffler, I. (1974). Four pragmatists: A critical introduction to Pierce, James, Mead, and Dewey. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  43. Scriven, Michael, in J. Esterle, & D. Clurman (1993). Conversations with critical thinkers (pp. 29–50). San Francisco: The Whitman Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Sharp, A. (1988). What is a community of inquiry. In J. Portelli & W. Hare (Eds.), Philosophy and education (pp. 207–225). Calgary: Detselig Enterprise.Google Scholar
  45. Sharp, A. (1993). The community of inquiry: Education for democracy. In M. Lipman (Ed.), Thinking children and education (pp. 337–345). Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  46. Shulman, L. (1997). Communities of learners & communities of teachers. Jerusalem: The Mandel Institute.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, F. (1990). To think. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sternberg, R. (1984). How can we teach intelligence? Educational Leadership, 39(1), 38–48.Google Scholar
  49. Sternberg, R., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Tishman, S., Perkins, D., & Jay, E. (1995). The thinking classroom: Learning and teaching in a culture of thinking. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  52. Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, B. (1994). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Sarasota: Center for Creative Learning.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoram Harpaz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Beit Berl Teachers’ CollegeBeit BerlIsrael
  2. 2.Al-Qasemi Islamic Teachers’ CollegeBeit BerlIsrael

Personalised recommendations