Teaching Preservice Early Childhood Educators About Humane Education

Chapter
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 8)

Abstract

Young children are inquisitive about their environment. Humane education has the potential to create various learning opportunities to expand children’s understanding and skills for becoming responsible citizens of the globe. The infusion of humane education values into curriculum should occur every day. Therefore, early childhood teachers should incorporate humane education in lessons across the curriculum. Nevertheless, teachers need experience and preparation for this task. In the field of teacher preparation, courses on humane education can create opportunities for preservice teachers to construct knowledge, skills, and attitudes for shaping young children’s mind about the environment. This chapter proposes an argument for the infusion of humane education courses within teacher preparation. The theoretical framework emerges from a review of research on school-based humane education programs and on humane education courses at the university level. Subsequently, a project that piloted infused multidisciplinary humane education courses into teacher preparation is described, followed by the recommendations for early childhood teacher educators.

Keywords

Humane education Early childhood teacher preparation Multidisciplinary approach Service learning Action-research 

References

  1. Aguirre, V., & Orihuela, A. (2010). Assessment of the impact of an animal welfare educational course with first grade children in rural schools in the state of Morelos, Mexico. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(1), 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Pet Products Association. (2011–2012). National pet owners survey (2011–12).Retrieved from http://www.americanpetproducts.org/pubs_survey.asp
  3. American Society from Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. (n.d.). Virtual pet behaviorist. Retrieved from http://www.aspcabehavior.org/articles/57/Dog-Bite-Prevention-.aspx
  4. Anderson, K., & Olson, M. (2006). The value of a dog in a classroom of children with severe emotional disorders. Anthrozoös, 19(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbour, R., Signal, T., & Taylor, N. (2009). Teaching kindness: The promise of humane education. Society and Animals, 1(2), 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ascione, F. (1992). Enhancing children’s attitudes about humane treatment of animals. Anthrozoös, 5(3), 176–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ascione, F. (2005). Children and animals: Exploring the roots of kindness and cruelty. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beirne, P., & Alagappan, M. (2007). A note on pedagogy: Humane education making a difference. Journal of Critical Animal Studies, 5(2), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.criticalanimalstudies.org/volume-v-issue-ii-2007/ Google Scholar
  9. Chapman, S., Cornwall, J., Righetti, J., & Sung, L. (2000). Preventing dog bites in children: Randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention. British Medical Journal, 320, 1512–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daly, B., & Suggs, S. (2010). Teachers’ experiences with humane education and animals in the elementary classrooms: Implications for empathy development. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeLoache, J., Pickard, M., & LoBue, V. (2011). How very young children think about animals. In P. McCadle, S. McCune, A. Griffin, & V. Maholmes (Eds.), How animals affect us (pp. 85–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  12. Deming, J., Jones, K., Caldwell, S., & Phillips, A. (2009). Kids interacting with dogs safely. Englewood, CO: American Humane Association.Google Scholar
  13. Donahue, T. (2011). A case for humane education. Independent Teacher, 8(2). Retrieved from http://www.nais.org/publications/itmagazinearticle.cfm?Itemnumber=155182
  14. Esteves, S., & Stokes, T. (2008). Social effects of a dog’s presence on children with disabilities. Anthrozoös, 21(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Faver, C. (2010). School-based humane education as a strategy to prevent violence: Review and recommendations. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(3), 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Florida State Education Standards and Character Counts. Martin County School District. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://charactercounts.org/pdf/state-standards/Florida-state-standards_grades-PreK-2.pdf
  17. Gee, N. (2010). Animals in the classroom. In P. McCardle, S. McCune, A. Griffin, L. Esposito, & L. Freund (Eds.), Animals in our lives: Human-animal interaction in family, community, and therapeutic settings (pp. 117–141). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  18. Hergovich, A., Monshi, B., Semmler, G., & Zieglmayer, V. (2002). The effects of the presence of a dog in the classroom. Anthrozoös, 15(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Institute for Humane Education. (n.d.). Humane education graduate programs. Retrieved from http://humaneeducation.org/sections/view/graduateprograms
  20. Jalongo, M. (2004). The world’s children and their companion animals. Olney, MD: Association for Childhood Education International.Google Scholar
  21. Jalongo, M. (2006). When teaching children about pets, be certain to address safety issues. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(5), 289–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jalongo, M. (2008). Beyond a pets theme. Teaching young children to interact safely with dogs. Early Childhood Education Journal., 36(1), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Melson, G. (2001). Why the wild things are: Animals in the lives of children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. National Association of Education for Young Children. (2010). NAEYC Standards for initial and advanced early childhood preparation programs. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/ncate/file/NAEYC%20Initial%20and%20Advanced%20Standards%206_2011-final.pdf
  25. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (n.d.). The growing number of English language learner students. 1998/99-2-008/09. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/files/uploads/9/growingLEP_0809.pdf
  26. National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2008). Unit standards. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/Standards/NCATEUnitStandards/UnitStandardsinEffect2008/tabid/476/Default.aspx#stnd1
  27. Nicoll, K., Trifone, C., & Samuels, W. (2008). An in-class, humane education program can improve young students’ attitudes toward animals. Society and Animals, 16, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rud, A., Jr., & Beck, A. (2003). Companion animals in Indiana elementary schools. Anthrozoös, 16(3), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spiegel, I. (2000). A pilot study to evaluate an elementary school-based dog bite prevention program. Anthrozoös, 13(3), 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Szecsi, T., Barbero, M., DeCampo, A., & Toledo, M. (2010/2011). Teaching respect, responsibility, and kindness through dog safety lessons. Childhood Education, 87(2), 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tate, K. (2011). Integrating humane education into teacher education: Meeting our social and civic responsibilities. Teacher Education and Practice, 24(3), 301–315.Google Scholar
  32. Thomas, S., & Beirne, P. (2002). Humane education and humanistic philosophy: Toward a new curriculum. Journal of Humanistic Counseling Education and Development, 41(2), 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tissen, I., Hergovich, A., & Spiel, C. (2007). School-based social training with and without dogs: Evaluation of their effectiveness. Anthrozoös, 20(4), 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, F., Dwyer, F., & Bennett, P. (2003). Prevention of dog bites: Evaluation of a brief educational intervention program for preschool children. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityFort MyersUSA

Personalised recommendations