Nanotribological Characterization of Polymeric Nanocoatings: From Fundamental to Application

  • Mohsen Mohseni
  • Hossein Yahyaei
  • Hossein Yari
  • Bahram Ramezanzadeh
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 203)


Polymers are chemical compounds or mixture of compounds consisting of repeating structural units created through a process known polymerization. These are important groups of materials made up of long chain carbon, covalently bonded together. Polymerization is a process in which monomeric molecules react together chemically to form macromolecules. Polymers are now finding increasing use in engineering applications due to unique properties. Mechanical strength of polymers is of prime importance in engineering applications. Polymers in their service life are exposed to different mechanical and thermal stresses. Durability of polymer strongly depends on the resistance of these materials against environmental condition. In order to assess the strength of material, good knowledge on mechanic of materials is imperative. In this manner, this section aims at introducing mechanical properties of polymers.


Molybdenum Disulfide Tribological Property Polymer Surface Abrasion Resistance Scratch Resistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amerio E, Sangermano M, Malucelli G, Priola A, Voit B (2005) Preparation and characterization of hybrid nanocomposite coatings by photopolymerization and sol–gel process. Polymer 46:11241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amerio E, Sangermano M, Colucci G, Malucelli G, Messori M, Taurino R, Fabbri P (2008) UV curing of Organic-Inorganic hybrid coatings containing Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane blocks. Macromol Mater Eng 293:700–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barletta M, Bellisario D, Rubino G, Ucciardello N (2010) Scratch and wear resistance of transparent topcoats on carbon laminates. Prog Org Coat 67:209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bautista Y, Gómez MP, Ribes C, Sanz V (2011) Correlation between the wear resistance, and the scratch resistance, for nanocomposite coatings. Prog Org Coat 70(4):178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand-Lambotte P, Loubet JL, Verpy C, Pavan S (2002) Understanding of automotive clearcoats scratch resistance. Thin Solid Films 420–421:281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binyang D, Ophelia KC, Qingling Z, Tianbai H (2001) Study of elastic modulus and yield strength of polymer thin films using atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 17:3286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowden PB (1973) In: Haward RN (ed) The physics of glassy polymers. Applied Science Publisher Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowden PB, Young RJ (1974) Deformation mechanisms in crystalline polymers. J Mater Sci 9:2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Briscoe BJ, Evans PD, Pelillo E, Sinha SK (1996a) Scratching maps for polymers. Wear 200:137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briscoe BJ, Pelillo E, Sinha SK (1996b) Scratch hardness and deformation maps for polycarbonate and polyethylene. Polym Eng Sci 36(24):2996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrión FJ, Ao Arribas, Bermu’dez MD, Guillamon A (2008) Physical and tribological properties of a new polycarbonate-organoclay nanocomposite. Eur Polymer J 44:968–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cartledge HCY, Baillie C, Mai YW (1996) Friction and wear mechanisms of a thermoplastic composite GF/PA6 subjected to different thermal histories. Wear 194:178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cordes DB, Lickiss PD, Rataboul F (2010) Recent developments in the chemistry of cubic Polyhedral Oligosilsesquioxanes. Chem Rev 110:2081–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Courter JL (1997) Mar resistance of automotive clearcoat: I. Relationship to coating mechanical properties. J Coat Technol 69(866):57Google Scholar
  15. Groenewolt M (2008) Highly scratch resistant coatings for automotive applications. Prog Org Coat 61:106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hara Y, Mori T, Fujitani T (2000) Relationship between viscoelasticity and scratch morphology of coating films. Prog Org Coat 40:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hou X, Shan CX, Choy KL (2008) Microstructures and tribological properties of PEEK-based nanocomposite coatings incorporating inorganic fullerene-like nanoparticles. Surf Coat Technol 202:2287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchings IM (1992) Tribology-Friction and wear of engineering materials. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  19. Jardret V, Morel P (2003) Viscoelastic effects on the scratch resistance of polymers: relationship between mechanical properties and scratch properties at various temperatures. Prog Org Coat 48:322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jardret V, Ryntz R (2005) Visco-Elastic Visco-Plastic analysis of scratch resistance of organic coatings. J Coat Technol Res 2(8):591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jardret V, Zahouani H, Loubet JL, Mathia TG (1998) Understanding and quantification of elastic and plastic deformation during a scratch test. Wear 218:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jardret V, Lucas BN, Oliver W (2000) Scratch durability of automotive clear coatings: a quantitative, reliable and robust methodology. J Coat Technol 72(907):79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ (1983) Fracture behavior of polymers. Applied Science Publishers Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Messori M, Toselli M, Pilati F, Fabbri E, Fabbri P, Busoli S, Pasquali L, Nannarone S (2003) Flame retarding poly(methyl methacrylate) with nanostructured organic–inorganic hybrids coatings. Polymer 44:4463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nat DS (1980) A text book of materials and metallurgy. Katson Publishing House, LudhianaGoogle Scholar
  26. Nielsen LE (1962) Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. Dekker M. INCGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osterhold M, Wagner G (2002) Methods for characterizing the mar resistance. Prog Org Coat 45:365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Persson BNJ (2000) Sliding Friction–Physical principles and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramezanzadeh B, Mohseni M (2012) Preparation of sol–gel based nano-structured hybrid coatings: effects of combined precursor’s mixtures on coatings morphological and mechanical properties. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 64:232–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramezanzadeh B, Moradian S, Khosravi A, Tahmasebi N (2011a) A new approach to investigate scratch morphology and appearance of an automotive coating containing nano-SiO2 and polysiloxane additives. Prog Org Coat 72(3):541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramezanzadeh B, Moradian S, Tahmasebi N, Khosravi A (2011b) Studying the role of polysiloxane additives and nano-SiO2 on the mechanical properties of a typical acrylic/melamine clearcoat. Prog Org Coat 72:621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ramezanzadeh B, Mohseni M, Karbasi A (2012a) Preparation of sol–gel-based nanostructured hybrid coatings, part 1: morphological and mechanical studies. J Mater Sci 47:440–454Google Scholar
  34. Ramezanzadeh B, Moradian S, Khosravi A, Tahmassebi N (2012b) Effect of polysiloxane additives on the scratch resistance of an acrylic melamine automotive clearcoat. J Coat Technol Res 9(2):203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rostami M, Ranjbar Z, Mohseni M (2010) Investigating the interfacial interaction of different aminosilane treated nano silicas with a polyurethane coating. Appl Surf Sci 257:899–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rostami M, Mohseni M, Ranjbar Z (2012) An attempt to quantitatively predict the interfacial adhesion of differently surface treated nanosilicas in a polyurethane coating matrix using tensile strength and DMTA analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes 34:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salleh NGN, Yhaya MF, Hassan A, Bakar AA, Mokhtar M (2009) Development of Scratchand Abrasion-Resistant coating materials based on nanoparticles, cured by radiation. Int J Polym Mater 58:422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwarzentruber P (2002) Scratch resistance and weatherfastness of UV-curable clearcoats. Macromol Symp 187:531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suna J, Mukamal H, Liu Z, Shen W (2002) Analysis of the Taber test in characterization of automotive side windows. Tribo Lett 13:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tahmassebi N, Moradian S, Ramezanzadeh B, Khosravi A, Behdad S (2010) Effect of addition of hydrophobic nano silica on viscoelastic properties and scratch resistance of an acrylic/melamine automotive clearcoat. Tribo Intern 43:685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang ZZ, Gu P, Zhang Z (2010) Indentation and scratch behavior of nano-SiO2/polycarbonate composite coating at the micro/nano-scale. Wear 269:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yahyaei H, Mohseni M (2013) Use of nanoindentation and nanoscratch experiments to reveal the mechanical behavior of sol–gel prepared nanocomposite films on polycarbonate. Tribol Int 57:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yahyaei H, Mohseni M, Bastani S (2011) Using Taguchi experimental design to reveal the impact of parameters affecting the abrasion resistance of sol–gel based UV curable nanocomposite films on polycarbonate. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 59:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang ACM, Wu TW (1997) Wear and friction in glassy polymers: micro-scratch on blends of polystyrene and poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide). J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 35:1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yari H, Moradian S, Tahmasebi N, Arefmanesh M (2012) The effect of weathering on tribological properties of an acrylic melamine automotive nanocomposite. Tribol Lett 46:123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohsen Mohseni
    • 1
  • Hossein Yahyaei
    • 1
  • Hossein Yari
    • 1
  • Bahram Ramezanzadeh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Polymer Engineering and Color TechnologyAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations