Architectural Ethics: A Phenomenological Perspective

  • Beata Sirowy
Part of the Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey book series (COPH, volume 11)


Many voices indicate that the moral mission of architecture has been in decline for the last few decades. Numerous theorists have been promoting a vision of architecture as an intellectualized, abstract exploration of form. Others suggest that architecture should investigate intelligence, projection, and innovation, following the market dynamics and seemingly staying away from a fruitless social critique. In both the aesthetic and the pragmatist approach, architects tend to see architecture as an autonomous discipline, reducing its dependency on external conditions – such as social, cultural, and political factors. Accordingly, the gap between architecture and the world of its users expands. Is there a way out of these difficulties? Ethics indubitably needs a more prominent place within architectural discourse.

This chapter addresses architectural ethics from a phenomenological perspective, referring primarily to the works of Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer. It argues that phenomenology – allowing for and demanding a non-reductionist account of the human environment – provides viable foundations for ethical discourse in architecture.

The article begins with a brief introduction to phenomenology, and then concentrates on two themes. Firstly, it discusses architecture as a part of the lifeworld and argues for the importance of context in architectural design. Secondly, it theorizes architectural ethics within the phenomenological concept of practice. The way of defining practice and specifying its priorities very much determines the way of approaching ethical issues within any given conceptual framework. The chapter concludes with an example of architectural practice (the Rural Studio) that reflects phenomenological ideas.


Practical Wisdom Ethical Reflection Human World Practical Science Hermeneutic Phenomenology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Allsopp, B. (1974). Towards a humane architecture. London: Frederick Muller.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle, S. (1998 [350 BC]). Nicomachean ethics. Mineola: Dover Thrift Editions.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, P. (1977). Form follows Fiasco: Why modern architecture hasn’t worked. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
  4. Dean, A (2001). The hero of Hale county: Sam Mockbee: An interview [On-line]. Available at: . Retrieved December 12, 2009.
  5. Dean, A., & Hursley, T. (2002). Samuel Mockbee and an architecture of decency. The rural studio. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dean, A (2004). Samuel Mockbee: A life’s work. aia gold medal winner [On-line]. Available at: Retrieved September 11, 2009.
  7. Dripps, R. D. (1999). The first house: Myth, paradigm and the task of architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenman, P. (1984). The end of the classical: The end of the beginning, the end of the end. Perspecta 21: The Yale Architectural Journal, 21, 154–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadamer, H. G. (1981). Reason in the age of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gadamer, H.-G. (1993). The enigma of health: The art of healing in a scientific age. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gadamer, H. G. (2004 [1960]). Truth and method. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Giedion, S. ((2002)[1962]). Space, time and architecture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Harries, K. (1983). Thoughts on a non-arbitrary architecture. In D. Seamon (Ed.) (1993), Dwelling, seeing and designing. Toward a phenomenological ecology (pp. 41–59). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Harries, K. (1997). The ethical function of architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heathcott, J. (2007, May 18). The value of architecture. Metropolis Magazine. Available at: Retrieved November 16, 2008.
  17. Heidegger, M. (1962 [1927]). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, M. (1977a [1947]). Letter on humanism. In M. Heidegger (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 189–242). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Heidegger, M. (1977b [1951]). Building, dwelling, thinking. In M. Heidegger (Ed.), Basic writings (pp. 319–340). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hudson, J. (2001). Samuel Mockbee. [On-line]. Available Retrieved September 19, 2009.
  21. Husserl, E. ((1970) [1936]). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evaston: North Western University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ihde, D. (1993). Philosophy of technology: An introduction. St. Paul: Paragon House Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Ivy, R. (2002) Sambo. Night in Gotham.Architectural Record. 12. Available at: Retrieved February 11, 2009.
  24. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Kearney, R. (Ed.). (2001). Continental philosophy in the 20th century. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Koolhas, R., & Mau, B. (1995). S, M, L, XL. New York: Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lyotard, J. -F. (1988). Domus and megalopolis. In N. Leach (1997) (Ed.), Rethinking architecture: A reader in cultural theory. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Madison, G. B. (2001). The politics of postmodernity: Essays in applied hermeneutics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002 [1945]). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Mockbee, S. (1998) The rural studio. Architectural design, everyday and architecture. Available at: Retrieved January 22, 2010.
  31. Pérez-Gómez, A. (1983). Architecture and the crisis of modern science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ray, N. (Ed.). (2005). Architecture and its ethical dilemmas. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  33. Ryker, L. (1995). Mockbee Coker: Thought and process. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Sirowy, B. (2010). Phenomenological concepts in architecture. Towards a user-oriented practice. A Ph.D. dissertation. Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture and Design.Google Scholar
  36. Somol, R., & Whiting, S. (2002). Notes around the Doppler effect and other moods of modernism. Perspecta 33: The Yale Architectural Journal. Google Scholar
  37. Spector, T. (2001). The ethical architect: The dilemma of contemporary practice. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  38. Till, J. (2009). Architecture depends. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tippett, K. (2007) “Architecture of decency” Radio programme, 15.11. Available: Retrieved December 15, 2009.
  40. Tschumi, B. (1994). Architecture and disjunction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and contradiction in architecture. New York: The Museum of Modern Art Press.Google Scholar
  42. Vesely, D. (2004). Architecture in the age of divided representation. The question of creativity in the shadow of production. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Vitruvius (15 bc) De architectura (English trans: Ten Books on Architecture).Google Scholar
  44. Wasserman, B., Sullivan, P., & Palermo, G. (2000). Ethics and the practice of architecture. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Willis, J., Jost, M., & Nilakanta, R. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Department of Landscape Architecture and Spatial PlanningThe Norwegian University of Life SciencesÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations