Skip to main content

Caring for Adults with Acquired Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Family Care and Social Capital: Transitions in Informal Care

Abstract

Caring for an adult who has acquired a disability or developed a major disease or illness provides another context of informal care work. The care relationship must be negotiated as the boundaries of the disability are gradually ascertained. In this chapter, we reflect on the way the vulnerability of the person with disability is shared with the primary informal caregiver. We give greater focus, therefore, to the person with disability as a way of recognising that as they achieve ‘reconnection’, so too does the caregiver. This provides the context for a discussion of creating authentic lives for both caregiver and cared-for. Ethical issues which can arise within this relationship have been exemplified by the feminist movement, which has given a nuanced analysis of the possibility for exploitation within this form of care. In terms of the disability movement itself, most of the dialogue about care comes from those who have acquired a disability and this dialogue highlights ethical flashpoints. The chapter concludes by considering the types of supports necessary to facilitate effective caring in these contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, a situation such as that of a 56 year old man with tetraplegia killed by his paid worker (van Beynen 2010, Thursday, 17th June).

Further Reading

  • Berry, J. (2009). Lifespan perspectives on the family and disability. Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell Orto, A., & Power, P. (2000). Brain injury and the family (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, R. (2002). Listening in the silence, seeing in the dark: Reconstructing life after brain injury. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. L. (2001). Damaged identities: Narrative repair. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, M. (2003). Disability: A life course approach. Oxford: Polity Press/Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Arango-Lasprilla, K., Dezfulian, T., Kreutzer, J. S., et al. (2008). Predictors of marital stability 2 years following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 22(7–8), 565–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Leibson, C., & Malec, J. (2004). Long-term survival after traumatic brain injury: A population-based analysis. NeuroRehabilitation, 19, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchardt, T. (2003). Being and becoming: Social exclusion and the onset of disability (CASE Report 21). Report prepared for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, ESRC Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butera-Prinzi, F., Charles, N., Heine, K., et al. (2010). Family-to-family link up program: A community-based initiative supporting families caring for someone with an acquired brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 27(1), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, M. (2010). How should we care for the carers?: A care ethic for informal carers. Wellington: Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, J., Franche, R., Cheung, A., & Stewart, D. (2002). Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Cancer, 94, 521–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpinter, A., & Irwin, C. (2000). Just surviving: Talking with parents of children with very high disability support needs about how they get by. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, C. (2000). Where is the mango princess? New York: Alfred E. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell Orto, A., & Power, P. (2000). Brain injury and the family: A life and living perspective. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, S., & Waters, M. (Eds.). (2008). The economics of self-directed care. London: Control Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaum, J., & Benson, D. (2007). Acquired brain injury: An integrative neuro-rehabilitation approach. New York: Springer-Science Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, V., & French, S. (1993). Towards a psychology of disability. In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers – Enabling environments (pp. 26–33). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A., Armstrong, J., Buckley, A., et al. (2012). Encouraging family engagement in the rehabilitation process: A rehabilitation provider’s development of support strategies for family members of people with trauma. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(22), 1855–1862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. (2002). At the will of the body: Reflections on illness. Boston/New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, H., Coll, J., & Charlifue, S. (1998). Long term survival in spinal cord injury: A fifty year investigation. Spinal Cord, 36, 266–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, G. (2002). You always were a bastard. The Hastings Center Report, 32(6), 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Jones, L., Wood, S., Bates, G., Eckley, L., McCoy, E., Mikton, C., Shakespeare, T., & Officer, A. (2012). Prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1621–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, R. (2002). Listening in the silence, seeing in the dark: Reconstructing life after brain injury. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality and dependency. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, E. (2006). Positive and negative events experienced by parents with acquired physical disabilities and their adolescent children. Families, Systems & Health, 24(2), 160–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, A., Wilson, F. C., & Caldwell, S., et al. (2012). Decompressive hemicraniectomy following malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions: A mixed methods exploration of carer experience and level of burden. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1989). Disability and dependency: A creation of industrialized societies. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and dependency (pp. 6–22). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding disability: From theory to practice. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panko Reis, J., Breslin, M., Leszzoni, L., & Kirschner, K. (2004). It takes more than ramps to solve the crisis of healthcare for people with disabilities. Chicago: Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, P. E. (2008). Impact of brain injury on caregiver outcomes and on family quality of life. Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2000). Help. Birmingham: Venture Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sit, J., Wong, T., Clinton, M., Li, L., & Fong, Y. (2004). Stroke care in the home: The impact of social support on the general health of family caregivers. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(7), 816–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiell, K., Naaman, S., & Lee, A. (2007). Couples and chronic illness: An attachment perspective and emotionally focused therapy interventions. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 26(4), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, M., Kim, K., Kim, I., Cho, N., Choi, H., & Noh, S. (2005). Caregiver’s burden, depression and support as predictors of post-stroke depression: A cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2(6), 611–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Beynen, M. (2010). Killer thought victim better off dead. Christchurch: The Press. 17 June 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G., Daisley, A., & King, N. (1999). Relationship and family breakdown following acquired brain injury: The role of the rehabilitation team. Brain Injury, 13(8), 593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science and Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barrett, P., Hale, B., Butler, M. (2014). Caring for Adults with Acquired Disabilities. In: Family Care and Social Capital: Transitions in Informal Care. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6872-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics