Combined Modularized Tumor Therapy—Tumor Biology—and Prognostic Factors: Bioengineering Tumor Response

Chapter

Abstract

Two rather different understandings of tumor pathophysiology exist; one is based on a reductionist or an observer’s point of view (‘bottom-up’ approach) and the other on an evolution-adjusted or a participator’s perspective (‘top-down’ approach). Important clinical requirements can be addressed by both ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ strategies. The first requirement is the incorporation of clinical knowledge derived from the application of different therapeutic methodologies; ‘top-down’ strategies, for instance, provide therapeutic access to communication-associated pathologies. The second requirement is overcoming limitations of ‘bottom-up’ strategies by focusing on the systematization of a tumor systems’ normativity. Such strategies involve the heterogeneity of the communicative expression of tumor-promoting pathways, the tumor-specific and stage-specific accessibility and distribution of targets among cellular compartments, the heterogeneity of chromosomal or molecular-genetic aberrations in stroma and tumor cells, the presence of basic mechanisms implementing robustness, and repair mechanisms. Information derived from biomodulatory therapy approaches may be translated into an alternative tumor classification on the basis of evolution-adjusted tumor pathophysiology. This translation and the generation of a novel response and prognostic markers will hopefully further the future development of novel combined modularized therapeutic strategies for overcoming the problems due to the cytogenetically and molecular-genetically defined heterogeneity of tumor and stroma cells.

Keywords

Communicative Expression Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma Histological Tumor Type System Participator Palliative Care Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Nguyen DX, Bos PD, Massagué J (2009) Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat Rev Cancer 9(4):274–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fidler IJ (2012) Biological heterogeneity of cancer: Implication to therapy. Hum Vaccin Immunother 8(8):1141–1142Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coghlin C, Murray GI (2010) Current and emerging concepts in tumour metastasis. J Pathol 222(1):1–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Remark R, Alifano M, Cremer I, Sautès-Fridman C, Fridman WH, Damotte D (2012) Composition, organization and clinical impact of the adaptive and innate immune microenvironments in lung metastases from colorectal and renal cell carcinoma. CSH Asia/ICMS joint conference on tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron 4–6Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Remark R,Alifano M, Cremer I, Sautès-Fridman C, FridmanWH, Damotte D(2012) Composition, organization and clinical impact of the adaptiveand innate immune microenvironments in lung metastases fromcolorectal and renal cell carcinoma Cancer Microenviron. 2012 International Tumor Microenvironment Conference, abstract. S4–6; http://www.csh-asia.org/Programs/2012Programs/a-tumor%20Program_colorFORWEB.pdf
  6. 6.
    Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2008) Systems biology: a therapeutic target for tumor therapy. Cancer Microenviron 1(1):159–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Copley SD (2012) Moonlighting is mainstream: paradigm adjustment required. Bioessays 34(7):578–588. doi:10.1002/bies.201100191Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2010) The comparative uncovering of tumor systems biology by modularly targeting tumor-associated inflammation. In: From molecular to modular tumor therapy: the tumor microenvironment, vol 3, part 4. pp 287–303. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9531-2_13Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reichle A, Hildebrandt GC (2010) Uncovering tumor systems biology by biomodulatory therapy strategies. In: From molecular to modular tumor therapy: the tumor microenvironment, vol 3, part 4. pp 287–303. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9531-2_13Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meyer S, Vogt T, Landthaler M, Berand A, Reichle A, Bataille F, Marx A, Saute G, Hartmann A, Kunz-Schughart L (2010) Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARG) are stage-dependent prognostic markers of malignant melanoma. In: From molecular to modular tumor therapy: the tumor microenvironment, vol 3, part 6. pp 433–465. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9531-2_22Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brinton LT, Brentnall TA, Smith JA, Kelly KA (2012) Metastatic biomarker discovery through proteomics. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 9(6):345–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deisboeck TS, Wang Z, Macklin P, Cristini V (2011) Multiscale cancer modeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 13:127–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cornelissen JJ, Breems D, van Putten WL, Gratwohl AA, Passweg JR, Pabst T, Maertens J, Beverloo HB, van Marwijk Kooy M, Wijermans PW, Biemond BJ, Vellenga E, Verdonck LF, Ossenkoppele GJ, Löwenberg B (2012) Comparative analysis of the value of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia with monosomal karyotype versus other cytogenetic risk categories. J Clin Oncol 30(17):2140–2146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harshman LC, Xie W, Bjarnason GA, Knox JJ, MacKenzie M, Wood L, Srinivas S, Vaishampayan UN, Tan MH, Rha SY, Donskov F, Agarwal N, Kollmannsberger C, North S, Rini BI, Heng DY, Choueiri TK (2012) Conditional survival of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma treated with VEGF-targeted therapy: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 13(9):927–935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Hematology/OncologyUniversity Hospital RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations