Advertisement

E. W. Hilgard and the History of Irrigation in the San Joaquin Valley: Stunning Productivity, Slowly Undone by Inadequate Drainage

  • James D. OsterEmail author
  • Dennis Wichelns
Chapter
Part of the Global Issues in Water Policy book series (GLOB, volume 5)

Abstract

After the California gold rush in 1894, the attention turned to farming. Soon irrigated agriculture flourished aided by federal policies in settling the West and providing water supply. It continued to expand with favorable water rights and policies, advancements in irrigation technologies, and imported water supplies. The need of subsurface drainage was long understood but failed to materialize due to lack of collective actions. The salinity drainage predicament in the San Joaquin Valley culminated in the selenium eco-toxicological harms further complicated the disposal issues.

Keywords

Drainage Water Irrigate Agriculture Evaporation Pond Water District Agricultural Drainage Water 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Belitz, K. M., & Phillips, S. P. (1995). Alternative to agricultural drains in California’s San Joaquin Valley: Results of a regional-scale hydrogeologic approach. Water Resources Research, 3, 1845–1862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. DWR (California Department of Water Resources). (1957). California water plan (California ot pHot Department of Water Resources Bulletin No. 3–35). Sacramento: California Department of Water ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  3. DWR (California Department of Water Resources). (2009). History of the California state water project. http://www.water.ca.gov/swp/history.cfm. Accessed June 2012.
  4. Cervinka, V., Diener, J., Erickson, J., Finch, C., Martin, M., Menezes, F., Peters, D., & Shelton, J. (1999). Integrated system for agricultural drainage management on irrigated farmland (Final research report, 4-FG-20–11920, 41pp). Five Points: Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior. Sacramento, Calif.Google Scholar
  5. Dean’s Committee, University of California. (1968). Agricultural development of new lands on the west side of San Joaquin Valley: Land, crops and economics (Science Report 1). College of Agriculture and Environmental Science. University of California, Davis, Calif.Google Scholar
  6. Fogg, G. V., Davis, H., Dubrovsky, N., Harter, T., Igawa, B., Javandel, I., Lee, S., Moore, D., Quinn, N. W. T., Shanks, G., Shannon, W., Wu, J., Alemi, M., & Verrill, W. (1999). Task 6. Groundwater management technical committee final report, San Joaquin Valley Drainage Implementation Program (52pp). UC. Center For Water Resources, Oakland, Calif.Google Scholar
  7. GAO (General Accounting Office). (1996). Bureau of reclamation: Information on allocation and repayment of costs of constructing water projects (GAO/RCED-96-109, 80 pages). Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.Google Scholar
  8. Hanson, B. R., Hutmacher, R. B., & May, D. M. (2006). Drip irrigation of tomato and cotton under shallow saline ground water conditions. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 20(2/3), 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hilgard, E. W. (1886). Irrigation and alkali in India (Bulletin 86, 34pp). Berkeley: College of Agriculture, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hilgard, E. W. (1893). The physical and industrial geography of California. The Geographical Journal, 1(6), 536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman, G. J., Oster, J. D., Maas, E. V., Rhoades, J. D., & van Schilfgaarde, J. (1984). Minimizing salt in drain water by irrigation management. Agricultural Water Management, 9, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnston, W. E., & McCalla, A. F. (2004). Wither California agriculture: Up, down or out? Some thoughts about the future (Special Report 041). Berkeley: Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics.Google Scholar
  13. Johnston, W. R., Westcot, D. W., & Delmore, M. (2011). Chapter 32: San Joaquin Valley, California: A case study. In: W. W. Wallender & K. K. Tanji (Eds.), Agricultural salinity assessment and management (ASCE Manual and Report on Engineering Practice No. 71, 2nd ed., pp. 977–1031). Ralston: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
  14. Kaffka, S. R., Oster, J. D., Corwin, D. L. (2002, August 14–21). Using forages and livestock to manage drainage water in the San Joaquin Valley. In I. Kheoruenrome (Ed.), Proceedings of the 17th world congress of soil science (Symp. no. 34: 2059-1 to 2059-12). Bangkok. International Union of Soil Science, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  15. Kelley, L., & Nye, R. L. (1984). Historical perspective on salinity and drainage problems in California. California Agriculture, 38(10), 4–6.Google Scholar
  16. Larson, K. J., Başağaoğlu, H., & Mariño, M. A. (2001). Prediction of optimal safe ground water yield and land subsidence in the Los Banos-Kettleman City area, California, using a calibrated numerical simulation model. Journal of Hydrology, 242(1–2), 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Letey, J., Roberts, C., Penberth, M., & Vasek,C. (1986). An agricultural dilemma: Drainage water and toxics disposal in the San Joaquin Valley (Agricultural Experiment Station Special Publication 3319, 55pp). Oakland: University of California.Google Scholar
  18. Letey, J., Birkle, D. E., Jury, W. A., & Ka, I. (2003). Model describes long-term sustanable recycling of agricultural drainage water. California Agriculture, 57(1), 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGahan, J. C., & Falaschi, D. (2008, March). Westside regional drainage plan implementation in the grassland drainage area. Presentation at the 2008 University of California Salinity and Drainage Task Force Meeting, Sacramento.Google Scholar
  20. Murry-Darling Basin Ministerial Council. (2001). Integrated catchment management in Murray-Darling Basin 2001–2010: Delivering a sustainable future. Canberra: Murray-Darling Basin Commission.Google Scholar
  21. National Research Council. (1989). Irrigation-induced water quality problems: What can be learned from the San Joaquin Valley experience (p. 149). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ogden, G. R. (1988). Agricultural land use and wildlife in the San Joaquin Valley. 1769–1930: An overview. SOLO Heritage Research, San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program. Sacramento: U.S. Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  23. Oster, J. D. (1994). Irrigation with poor quality water. Agricultural Water Management, 25, 271–297.Google Scholar
  24. Oster, J. D., & Rhoades, J. D. (1975). Calculated drainage water compositions and salt burdens resulting from irrigation with river waters in the western United States. Journal of Environmental Quality, 4, 73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quinn, N. W. T., McGahan, J. C., & Delamore, M. L. (1998). Innovative strategies reduce selenium in Grasslands drainage. California Agriculture, 52(5), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rhoades, J. D., Oster, J. D., Ingvalson, R. D., Tucker, J. M., & Clark, M. (1974). Minimizing the salt burdens of irrigation drainage waters. Journal of Environmental Quality, 3, 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rhoades, J. D., Bingham, F. T., Letey, J., Hoffman, G. J., Dedrick, A. R., Pinter, P. J., & Replogle, J. A. (1989). Use of saline drainage water for irrigation: Imperial Valley study. Agricultural Water Management, 16, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robie, R. (1988). The State Department of Water Resources, 1975–1983. California oral history (54pp). eBook and Text Archive, California Digital Library. http://archive.org/details/statedeptwater00robirich. Accessed May 2013.
  29. SJVDIP (San Joaquin Valley Drainage Implementation program). (1990). A management plan for agricultural subsurface drainage and related problems on the westside San Joaquin Valley. California final report of the San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program. Sacramento: U.S. Department of the Interior and California Resources Agency.Google Scholar
  30. Skaggs, R. W., & van Schilfgaarde, J. (1999). Introduction. In R. W. Skaggs & J. van Schilfgaarde (Eds.), Agricultural drainage (pp. 3–10). Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
  31. SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board. (1977). San Joaquin Valley Interagency Drainage Program environmental assessment – Phase 1. Prepared for the California State Water Resources Control Board by Environmental Impact Planning Corporation, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  32. SWRCB (State Water Resources Control Board). (1987). Regulation of agricultural drainage to the San Joaquin River (Final report WQ 85-1). Sacramento: State Water Resources Control Board.Google Scholar
  33. USBR (U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation). (1949). Central Valley basin: Comprehensive report on planned water resources development in the Central Valley. Sacramento: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.Google Scholar
  34. van Schilfgaarde, J., Bernstein, L., Rhoades, J. D., & Rawlins, S. L. (1974). Irrigation management for salt control. Journal Irrigation Drainage Division, American Society Civil Engineers, 100, 321–335.Google Scholar
  35. Wichelns, D. (2003). Experience in implementing economic incentives to conserve water and improve environmental quality in the broadview water district, California. A five-part series of Technical Notes prepared for the World Bank, H World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  36. Wichelns, D. (2005). Economic analysis of integrated on-farm drainage management. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 19(2), 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wichelns, D., & Cone, D. (2006). A water transfer and agricultural land retirement in a drainage problem area. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 20(2–3), 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wichelns, D., & Oster, J. D. (2006). Sustainable irrigation is necessary and achievable, but direct costs and environmental impacts can be substantial. Agricultural Water Management, 86(1–2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations