Advertisement

California and Beyond: An International Perspective on the Sustainability of Irrigated Agriculture

  • Dennis WichelnsEmail author
  • James D. Oster
Chapter
Part of the Global Issues in Water Policy book series (GLOB, volume 5)

Abstract

Salinity and drainage are well entrenched problems of irrigated agriculture, applied globally across a wide range of geographic and cultural conditions. Two primary causes are inappropriate irrigation water management and delayed construction of an adequate drainage system. Long term perspectives are necessary in dealing with governance and institutional consistencies in water management. Successes elsewhere may be examples for California. Toxic trace elements in drainage water, including selenium, are not unique to the San Joaquin Valley. Lessons California learned may be a unique contribution to the international body of knowledge about the sustainability of irrigated agriculture because it was the first situation where potential environmental catastrophe caused by irrigation involved the toxic trace element.

Keywords

Drainage Water Salinity Problem Drainage Problem Agricultural Drainage Water Water Quality Objective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We wish to thank the following for their help in writing this chapter: Professor Mehmet Ali Cullu, University of Harran, Department of Soil Science, Sanluerfa, Turkey; Dr. Manzoor Qadir, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria; Dr. Chris Smith, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia; Dennis W. Westcot, formally California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, Sacramento, California; Douglas E. Davis, Tulare Lake Drainage District, Corcoran, California, Michael L. Delamore, formally U.S. Bureau of Reclamation; William (Bill) R. Johnston, formally Westlands Water District, Fresno, California; Sarge Green, Westside Resource Conservation District, Fresno, California; and David Cone, Southern San Joaquin Valley Water Quality Coalition, Fresno, California We also thank Debra Silva for her help with text editing.

References

  1. Adaman, F., & Ozertan, G. (2007). Perceptions and practices of farmers towards the salinity problem: The case of the Harran plain, Turkey. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 6(4/5), 533–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamson, D., Mallawaarachchi, T., & Quiggin, J. (2007). Water use and salinity in the Murray-Darling basin: A state-contingent model. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 51, 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aksit, B., & Akcay, A. A. (1997). Sociocultural aspects of irrigation practices in southeastern Turkey. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(4), 523–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aküzüm, T., Kodal, S., & Çakmak, B. (1997). Irrigation management in GAP. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(4), 547–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali, G., Asghar, M. N., Latif, M., & Hussain, Z. (2004). Optimizing operational strategies of scavenger wells in lower Indus basin of Pakistan. Agricultural Water Management, 66(3), 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Altinbіlek, H. D. (1997). Water and land resources development in Southeastern Turkey. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(3), 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aslam, M., & Prathapar, S. A. (2006). Strategies to mitigate secondary salinization in the Indus Basin of Pakistan: A selective review (Research Report 97). Colombo: International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Beare, S., & Heaney, A. (2001). Irrigation, water quality and water rights in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (Conference Paper 2001.15), Canberra.Google Scholar
  9. Bhutta, M. N., & Chaudhry, M. R. (1999, June 28–30). Achievements and issues in 20th century in waterlogging and salinity. In Proceedings of national workshop on water resources achievements and issues in 20th century and Challenges for the Next Millennium, held at Islamabad. Islamabad: Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources (PCRWR).Google Scholar
  10. Bhutta, M. N., & Smedema, L. K. (2007). One hundred years of waterlogging and salinity control in the Indus Valley, Pakistan: A historical review. Irrigation and Drainage, 56(s1), s81–s90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackmore, D. J. (1995). Murray-Darling Basin Commission: A case study in integrated catchment management. Water Science and Technology, 32(5–6), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowonder, B., Ramana, K. V., Ravi, C., & Srinivas, C. (1987). Land use, waterlogging and irrigation management. Land Use Policy, 4(3), 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, A. C., Skaggs, R. W., Hermsmeier, L. F., & Johnston, W. R. (1983). Evaluation of a water management model for irrigated agriculture. Transactions of ASAE, 26(2), 412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christen, E. W., Ayars, J. E., & Hornbuckle, J. W. (2001). Subsurface drainage design and management in irrigated areas of Australia. Irrigation Science, 21(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CVRWQCB (Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board). (1988). The modification to beneficial uses and water quality objectives necessary for the regulation of agricultural subsurface drainage discharges in the San Joaquin Basin (5C) (Staff Report, 30 pp.). Sacramento: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region. http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb5/water_issues/swamp/historic_reports_and_faq_sheets/1988_bpa/beneficial_use_wq_obj.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2013.
  16. CVRWQCB (Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board). (1996). Amendments to the water quality control plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River basins for the control of agricultural subsurface drainage discharges: Staff report. Sacramento: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region.Google Scholar
  17. Datta, K. K., & de Jong, C. (2002). Adverse effect of waterlogging and soil salinity on crop and land productivity in northwest region of Haryana, India. Agricultural Water Management, 57(3), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, D. E., Hanson, C., & Hanson, R. B. (2008). Constructed wetland habitat for American avocet and black-necked stilt foraging and nesting. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72(1), 143–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engberg, R. A., Westcot, D. W., Delamore, M., & Holz, D. D. (1998). Regulation and remediation of irrigation-induced selenium problems. In: W. T. Frankenberger, Jr. & R. A. Engberg (Eds.), Environmental chemistry of selenium (pp. 1–25). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Goesch, T., Hafi, A., Oliver, M., Page, S., Ashton, D., Hone, S., & Dyack, B. (2007). Drought and irrigation in Australia’s Murray-darling basin. Australian Commodities, 14(2), 342–352.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, E. (2007). Historical regulation of Victoria’s water sector: A case of government failure? The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 51, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heaney, A., & Beare, S. (2003). Improving water use efficiency: Competitive tendering for public investment. Australian Commodities, 10(2), 266–277.Google Scholar
  23. Hilgard, E. W. (1886). Irrigation and alkali in India. (University of California, College of Agriculture Bulletin 86, p 34), Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hillel, D. (1991). Out of the earth. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hornbuckle, J. W., Christen, E. W., & Faulkner, R. D. (2007). Evaluating a multi-level subsurface drainage system for improved drainage water quality. Agricultural Water Management, 89(3), 208–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobson, T., & Adams, R. M. (1958). Salt and silt in ancient Mesopotamian agriculture. Science, 128, 1251–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston, W. R., Westcot, D. W., & Delmore, M. (2011). Chapter 32 San Joaquin Valley, California: A case study. In W. W. Wallender & K. K. Tanji (Eds.), Agricultural salinity assessment and management (ASCE Manual and Report on Engineering Practice No. 71, 2nd ed, pp. 977–1031). Ralston: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
  28. Jurriens, R., & Mollinga, P. P. (1996). Scarcity by design: Protective irrigation in India and Pakistan. Irrigation and Drainage, 45(2), 31–53.Google Scholar
  29. Kahlown, M. A., Marri, M. K., & Azam, M. (2007). Design, construction and performance evaluation of small tile drainage systems in the Indus basin. Irrigation and Drainage, 56(s1), s217–s225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karkoski, J. (1994). A total monthly load model for the San Joaquin River. Sacramento: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region.Google Scholar
  31. Karkoski, J., Young, T. F., Congdon, C. H., & Haith, D. A. (1993). Development of a Selenium TMDL for the San Joaquin River. In Management of irrigation and drainage systems. Proceedings of irrigation and drainage systems division (pp. 667–674). Ralston: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
  32. Kendirli, K., Çakmak, B., & Ucar, Y. (2005). Salinity in the southeastern Anatolia project (GAP), Turkey: Issues and options. Irrigation and Drainage, 54, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Khan, S., Tariq, R., Yuanlai, C., & Blackwell, J. (2006). Can irrigation be sustainable? Agricultural Water Management, 80, 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khan, S., Tariq, R., & Hanjra, M. A. (2008). A cross disciplinary framework for linking farms with regional groundwater and salinity management targets. Agricultural Water Management, 95(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kudat, A. (1999). Sanliurfa and Harran Plains on-farm and village development project. Social Development Notes, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Network (Note Number 46). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  36. Kulga, D., & Çakmak, C. (1997). Toward sustainable water management in the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP). International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(4), 541–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. MDBC (Murray-Darling Basin Commission). (2006). Interstate water trade and salinity (MDBC Fact Sheet 6, May, 2006, 2 pp). http://www2.mdbc.gov.au/__data/page/114/MDB3614_Fact_Sheet_6.pdf. Accessed June 2012.
  38. MDBC (Murray-Darling Basin Commission). (2012). About MDB initiative. http://www2.mdbc.gov.au/about/index.html. Accessed June 2012.
  39. Molden, D. (Ed.). (2007). Water for food, water for life: A comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Colombo: Earthscan, London and the International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
  40. Oster, J. D., & Wichelns, D. (2003). Economic and agronomic strategies to achieve sustainable irrigation. Irrigation Science, 22, 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quiggin, J. (1988). Murray River salinity – An illustrative model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(3), 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quinn, N. W. T., Linneman, J. C., & Tanji, K. K. (2006). The San Joaquin Valley westside perspective. Presented at the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, 22–25 May 2006. Omaha: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBN−60613, 27 March 2006. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6c92s39s#page-2. Accessed 23 June 2013.
  43. Qureshi, A. S., McCornick, P. G., Qadir, M., & Aslan, Z. (2008). Managing salinity and waterlogging in the Indus Basin of Pakistan. Agricultural Water Management, 95(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rhoades, J. D. (1989). Intercepting, isolating, and reusing drainage waters for irrigation to conserve water and protect water quality. Agricultural Water Management, 16(1–2), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ritzema, H. P., Wolters, W., Bhutta, M. N., Gupta, S. K., & Abdel-Dayem, S. (2007). The added value of research on drainage in irrigated agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage, 56(s1), s205–s215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ritzema, H. P., Satyanarayana, T. V., Raman, S., & Boonstra, J. (2008). Subsurface drainage to combat waterlogging and salinity in irrigated lands in India: Lessons learned in farmers’ fields. Agricultural Water Management, 95, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robie, R. (1988). The State Department of Water Resources, 1975–1983. California oral history (54 pp). eBook and Text Archive, California Digital Library. http://archive.org/details/statedeptwater00robirich. Accessed June 2012.
  48. Saysel, K., Barlas, Y., & Yenigün, O. (2002). Environmental sustainability in an agricultural development project: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 64(3), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schultz, B., Thatte, C. C., & Labhsetwar, V. K. (2005). Irrigation and drainage – Main contributors to global food production. Irrigation and Drainage, 54, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shah, T., Roy, A. D., Qureshi, A. S., & Wang, J. (2003). Sustaining Asia’s groundwater boom: An overview of issues and evidence. Natural Resources Forum, 27(2), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skaggs, R. W., Youssef, M. A., & Chescheir, G. M. (2006). Drainage design coefficients for eastern United States. Agricultural Water Management, 86(1–2), 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smedema, L. K., & Shiati, K. (2002). Irrigation and salinity: A perspective review of the salinity hazards of irrigation development in the arid zone. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 16(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Solow, R. M. (1974). The economics of resources or the resources of economics. The American Economic Review, 64(2), 1–14.Google Scholar
  54. Sturgess, G. L. (1997). Transborder water trading among the Australian states. In: T. L. Anderson & P. J. Hill (Eds.), Water marketing – The next generation (pp.127–146, 211pp). London: Rowman & Little Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Tekinel, O., Ünlü, M., Topaloğlu, F., & Kanber, R. (2002). TAP yöresinde su kullanimi ve tuzluluk (Use of irrigation water and salinity problems in the Southeastern Anatolia Project Area). KSE Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(1), 19–33.Google Scholar
  56. Ünver, I. H. O. (1997a). Southeastern Anatolia integrated development project (GAP): An overview of issues of sustainability. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(2), 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ünver, I. H. O. (1997b). Editorial. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(4), 439–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ünver, I. H. O. (1997c). Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP). International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(4), 453–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Steenbergen, F., & Oliemans, W. (2002). A review of policies in groundwater management in Pakistan 1950–2000. Water Policy, 4(4), 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ward, C., Darghouth, S., Minasyan, G., & Gambarelli, G. (2006). Reengaging in agricultural water management: Challenges and options. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  61. Westcot, D. W., Karkoski, J., & Schnagl, R. J. (1996). Non-point source policies for agricultural drainage. In E. Bathala (Ed.), Proceeding of the north American water and environment congress (pp. 83–88). New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, Environmental Engineering Division.Google Scholar
  62. Wichelns, D., & Oster, J. D. (2006). Sustainable irrigation is necessary and achievable, but direct costs and environmental impacts can be substantial. Agricultural Water Management, 86(1–2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolters, W., & Bhutta, M. N. (1997). Need for integrated irrigation and drainage management, example of Pakistan. In Proceedings, the International Land Reclamation Institute symposium towards integrated irrigation and drainage management. Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  64. Young, T. F., & Congdon, C. H. (1994). Plowing new ground – Using economic incentives to control water pollution from agriculture. Environmental Defense Fund, Nonpoint Source Pollution Report. Washington, DC: Environmental Defense Fund. http://www.edf.org/
  65. Young, M., & McColl, J. (2008). A future-proofed basin: A new water management regime for the Murray-Darling Basin (34 pp). Adelaide: The University of Adelaide.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations