Principles for the Ethical Guidance of PICT

  • Kenneth D. Pimple
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 11)


As used in this chapter, principles offer moral or ethical guidance at a level of specificity between those of foundational ethical theories, such as the Golden Rule or Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative, and detailed rules of conduct, such as the 600-some commandments in the Hebrew Bible or the ever-expanding U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. In this chapter I describe the utility of a principle-based approach and offer a preliminary set of principles intended to provide practical guidance to people and organizations who create, distribute, use, and regulate pervasive information and communication technologies (PICT). My goal is to articulate principles at a level of abstraction that will facilitate (a) the creation of appropriate rules and (b) ethically sound decision-making and behavior in circumstances that no rules cover.


Moral Obligation Liberal Democracy Golden Rule Ethical Analysis Categorical Imperative 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



In addition to many of the people mentioned in the Acknowledgments for the entire volume, I am indebted to Katherine D. Seelman and Jennifer Livesay for critical comments on an earlier draft.


  1. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bentham, Jeremy. 1891 [1776]. A fragment on government, ed. F.C. Montague. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Johnson, Deborah G. 2010. The role of ethics in science and engineering. Trends in Biotechnology 28(12): 589–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnson, Deborah G. 2011. Software agents, anticipatory ethics, and accountability. In The growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight: The pacing problem, ed. G.E. Marchant et al., 61–76. Dordrecht/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kant, Immanuel. 1785. The groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Various editions.Google Scholar
  6. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, D.C: United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.Google Scholar
  7. Ross, David. 2002 [1930]. The right and the good, ed. Philip Stratton-Lake. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Stratton-Lake, Philip. 2002. Introduction. In: Ross, David. 2002 [1930]. The right and the good. ed. Philip Stratton-Lake. Oxford: Clarendon Press, ix–lviii.Google Scholar
  9. Weinberg, Alvin M. 1966. Will technology replace social engineering? Alfred Korzybski Memorial Lecture.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Poytner CenterIndiana University BloomingtonBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations