Advertisement

Using Multi-Agent Systems for Hardware Upgrade Advice in Smart Grid Simulations

  • Ala Shaabana
  • Sami Syed
  • Ziad Kobti
  • Kemal Tepe
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 247)

Abstract

The environmental impact of the petroleum-based infrastructure has led to renewed interest in electrical transport infrastructures during the past few decades. However, the impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV) on electrical distribution and generation systems is not yet fully understood. This poses challenges to distribution and generation companies on how to retool their distribution and generation systems to meet and supply increased future demand. Furthermore, having unpredictable and uncontrollable generation patterns of renewable energy sources in the grid makes it even harder to manage supply and demand in the grid. The ultimate goal is to provide a tool for engineers to further understand and evaluate potential grid infrastructures under different operating conditions. With this simulator, the grid can be evaluated with different hardware and operating conditions to maximize resources. As such, utilities and generation companies can evaluate and test different strategies to upgrade the infrastructure to improve reliability and generation capacity to effectively meet demand.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence Energy conservation Multi-agent system Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle Renewable energy Simulation Smart grid 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC).

References

  1. 1.
    Schneider KP, Tuffner FK (2010) Evaluation of conservation voltage reduction (CVR) on a national level. In: U.S. Department of EnergyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    James G, Cohen D, Dodier R, Platt G, Palmer D (2006) A deployed multi-agent framework for distributed energy applications. In: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. AAMAS ’06. ACM. 1-59593-303-4. Hakodate, JapanGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dimeas A, Hatziargyriou N (2004) A multiagent system for microgrids. In: IEEE power engineering society general meeting, vol 1, pp 55–58Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sweda T, Klabjan D (2011) An agent-based decision support system for electric vehicle charging infrastructure deployment. In: IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference (VPPC)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhi Z, Jianhui W, Botterud A (2011) Agent-based electricity market simulation with plug-in hybrid electric vehicle penetration. In: IEEE power and energy society general meeting, July 2011. 1944-9925, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vandael S, Boucké N, Holvoet T, De Craemer K, Deconinck G (2011) Decentralized coordination of plug-in hybrid vehicles for imbalance reduction in a smart grid. In: The 10th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 2. AAMAS ’11. 0–9826571-6-1, 978–0-9826571-6-4. Taipei, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karnouskos S, de Holanda TN (2009) Simulation of a smart grid city with software agents. In: Third UKSim European symposium on computer modeling and simulation. EMS ’09. pp 424–429Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shaabana A, Syed S, Kobti Z, Tepe K (2012) Decision support using a multi-agent system for hardware upgrades in smart grids. In: Lecture notes in engineering and computer science: proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science, USA, San Francisco, 24–26 Oct 2012, pp 1287–1292Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ala Shaabana
    • 1
  • Sami Syed
    • 2
  • Ziad Kobti
    • 1
  • Kemal Tepe
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations