Abstract
The chapter questions the use of (quasi-) experimental designs as the exclusive (or the best) way to conduct educational research. It focuses not only on the problems of a quantitative approach, often ignoring the ‘ends’ and invoking ‘factors’ which operate independently, but also identifies the weaknesses of qualitative research, i.e. often stating the obvious and betraying the holistic nature of its own presuppositions. Starting from the insights of Peter Winch it is argued that one should start from ‘what makes sense for us’. Educational research is ‘philosophical’, i.e. it is about ‘concepts’ and ‘social practice’. Such an interpretative stance highlights further that educational research should be seen as a performative intervention that is interested in various modes of explanation and thus uses various methods. It contributes to the task of improving upon our practical knowledge of ongoing social life which presupposes dialogue between all those involved.
Keywords
- Interpretative research
- Winch
- Holistic approach
- What makes sense for us
- Performative intervention
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
AERA (2006) Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educ Res 35(6):33–40
Affeldt S (1998) The ground of mutuality: criteria, judgment, and intelligibility in Stephen Mulhall and Stanley Cavell. Eur J Philos 6(1):1–31
Baz A (2003) On when words are called for: Cavell, McDowell, and the wording of the world. Inquiry 46(4):473–500
Bohman J (1997) Pluralism, indeterminacy and the social sciences: reply to Ingram and Meehan. Hum Stud 20(4):441–458
Eisenhart M (2005) Hammers and saws for the improvement of educational research. Educ Theory 55(3):245–261
Fendler L (2006) Why generalizability is not generalizable. In: Smeyers P, Depaepe M (eds) Educational research: why ‘what works’ doesn’t work. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 51–64
Goldstein H, Blatchford P (1998) Class size and educational achievement: a review of methodology with particular reference to study design. Brit Educ Res J 24(3):255–268
Howe KR (2005) The question of education science: experimentism versus experimentalism. Educ Theory 55(3):307–321
Mahieu S, Vanderlinde R (2002) De professionele ontwikkeling van beginnende leerkrachten vanuit het micropolitiek perspectief [The professional development of recently graduated teachers from the perspective of micro politics]. Unpublished master’s thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Moss PA (2005) Understanding the other/understanding ourselves: toward a constructive dialogue about ‘principles’ in educational research. Educ Theory 55(3):263–283
Mosteller F, Light RJ, Sachs JA (1996) Sustained inquiry in education: lessons from skill grouping and class size. Harv Educ Rev 66(4):797–842
Mulhall S (2000) Misplacing freedom, displacing the imagination: Cavell and Murdoch on the fact/value distinction. Philosophy 47(Supp vol):255–277
National Research Council (2002) Scientific research in education. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Polkinghorne D (1995) Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. Int J Qual Stud Educ 8(1):5–23
Schwandt TA (2005) Diagnostic reading of scientifically based research for education. Educ Theory 55(3):285–305
Smith R (2006) Technical difficulties: the workings of practical judgement. In: Smeyers P, Depaepe M (eds) Educational research: why ‘what works’ doesn’t work. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 159–170
Winch P (1958) The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. Routledge, London
Wittgenstein L (1953) Philosophische Untersuchungen [Philosophical investigations] (trans: Anscombe GEM). Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smeyers, P. (2014). The Design(s) of Educational Research: Description and Interpretation. In: Reid, A., Hart, E., Peters, M. (eds) A Companion to Research in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6809-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6808-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6809-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)