Skip to main content

Agent-Based Modeling Approaches to Multi-Scale Systems Biology: An Example Agent-Based Model of Acute Pulmonary Inflammation

  • Chapter
Systems Biology

Abstract

Implicit in systems biology is the concept that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Agent-based modeling, an object-oriented, discrete event, population-based computational modeling method, is well suited to meeting this goal. By viewing systems as aggregates of populations of interacting components, agent-based models (ABMs) map well to biological conceptual models and present an intuitive means by which biomedical researchers can represent their knowledge in a dynamic computational form. ABMs are particularly suited for representing the behaviour of populations of cells (i.e. “cell-as-agents”), but ABMs have also been used to model molecular interactions, particularly when spatial and structural properties are involved. Presented herein are a series of ABMs of biomedical systems that cross multiple scales of biological organization, as well as a detailed description of an example ABM of acute pulmonary inflammation. Because of these characteristics agent-based modeling is a useful addition to the suite of equation-based mathematical modeling methods found in systems biology, and can serve as an integrating framework for dynamic knowledge representation of biological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ABM:

Agent-Based Modeling

ABMF:

Agent-Based Modeling Format

AI:

Artificial Intelligence

ALI:

Acute Lung Injury

APIABM:

Acute Pulmonary Injury Agent-Based Model

ARDS:

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

CMA:

Computational Modeling Assistant

DAMP:

Damage-Associated Molecular Products

EINISI:

Enteric Immunity Simulator

I-κB:

I-kappa-B

NCBO:

National Center for Biomedical Ontology

NEC:

Necrotizing enterocolitis

NF-κB:

Nuclear Factor kappa-B

ODD:

Overview, Design and Detail Protocol

ODE:

Ordinary differential equation

PMN:

Polymorphonuclear neutrophils

TGF-β1:

Transforming growth factor-β1

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-α

VILI:

Ventilator Induced Lung Injury

References

  1. Innovation or stagnation: challenge and opportunity on the critical path to new medical products (2004) [cited 1 May 2008]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/criticalpath/whitepaper.html

  2. An G (2010) Closing the scientific loop: bridging correlation and causality in the petaflop age. Sci Transl Med 2(41): 41ps34

    Google Scholar 

  3. An G et al (2009) Agent-based models in translational systems biology. Wiley Interdisc Rev Syst Biol Med. doi:10:1002/wsbm.45

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bankes SC (2002) Agent-based modeling: a revolution? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(3):7199–7200

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(3):7280–7287

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunt CA et al (2009) At the biological modeling and simulation frontier. Pharm Res

    Google Scholar 

  7. Walker DC, Southgate J (2009) The virtual cell: a candidate co-ordinator for ‘middle-out’ modeling of biological systems. Brief Bioinform 10(4):450–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang L, Athale CA, Deisboeck TS (2007) Development of a three-dimensional multiscale agent-based tumor model: simulating gene-protein interaction profiles, cell phenotypes and multicellular patterns in brain cancer. J Theor Biol 244(1):96–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santoni D, Pedicini M, Castiglione F (2008) Implementation of a regulatory gene network to simulate the TH1/2 differentiation in an agent-based model of hypersensitivity reactions. Bioinformatics 24(11):1374–1380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fallahi-Sichani M et al (2011) Multiscale computational modeling reveals a critical role for TNF-alpha receptor 1 dynamics in tuberculosis granuloma formation. J Immunol 186(6):3472–3483

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. An G (2009) Dynamic knowledge representation using agent-based modeling: ontology instantiation and verification of conceptual models. Methods Mol Biol 500:445–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunt CA et al (2006) Physiologically based synthetic models of hepatic disposition. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 33(6):737–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. An G (2008) Introduction of an agent-based multi-scale modular architecture for dynamic knowledge representation of acute inflammation. Theor Biol Med Model 5(1):11

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirschner DE et al (2007) Toward a multiscale model of antigen presentation in immunity. Immunol Rev 216:93–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Christley S, Alber MS, Newman SA (2007) Patterns of mesenchymal condensation in a multiscale, discrete stochastic model. PLoS Comput Biol 3(4):e76

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Engelberg JA, Ropella GE, Hunt CA (2008) Essential operating principles for tumor spheroid growth. BMC Syst Biol 2(1):110

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. SIGGRAPH 87 Comput Graph

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lipniacki T et al (2006) Stochastic regulation in early immune response. Biophys J 90(3):725–742

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lipniacki T et al (2006) Transcriptional stochasticity in gene expression. J Theor Biol 238(2):348–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vodovotz Y et al (2007) Evidence-based modeling of critical illness: an initial consensus from the society for complexity in acute illness. J Crit Care 22(1):77–84

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grimm V et al (2005) Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 310:987–991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. An G, Wilensky U (2009) From artificial life to in silico medicine: netlogo as a means of translational knowledge representation in biomedical research. In: Adamatsky A, Komosinski M (eds) Artificial life in software, vol 2. Springer, London, pp 183–209

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. An G (2001) Agent-based computer simulation and sirs: building a bridge between basic science and clinical trials. Shock 16(4):266–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. An G (2004) In silico experiments of existing and hypothetical cytokine-directed clinical trials using agent-based modeling. Crit Care Med 32(10):2050–2060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mansury Y, Diggory M, Deisboeck TS (2006) Evolutionary game theory in an agent-based brain tumor model: exploring the ‘genotype-phenotype’ link. J Theor Biol 238(1):146–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Deisboeck TS et al (2001) Pattern of self-organization in tumour systems: complex growth dynamics in a novel brain tumour spheroid model. Cell Prolif 34(2):115–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen S, Ganguli S, Hunt CA (2004) An agent-based computational approach for representing aspects of in vitro multi-cellular tumor spheroid growth. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:691–694

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thorne BC et al (2006) Modeling blood vessel growth and leukocyte extravasation in ischemic injury: an integrated agent-based and finite element analysis approach. J Crit Care 21(4):346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang J, Ley KF, Hunt CA (2007) Dynamics of in silico leukocyte rolling, activation, and adhesion. BMC Syst Biol 1:14

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang J et al (2004) Simulating leukocyte-venule interactions: a novel agent-oriented approach. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 7:4978–4981

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bailey AM, Thorne BC, Peirce SM (2007) Multi-cell agent-based simulation of the microvasculature to study the dynamics of circulating inflammatory cell trafficking. Ann Biomed Eng 35(6):916–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bailey AM et al (2009) Agent-based model of therapeutic adipose-derived stromal cell trafficking during ischemia predicts ability to roll on P-selectin. PLoS Comput Biol 5(2):e1000294

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mi Q et al (2007) Agent-based model of inflammation and wound healing: insights into diabetic foot ulcer pathology and the role of transforming growth factor-beta1. Wound Repair Regen 15(5):671–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Walker DC et al (2004) Agent-based computational modeling of wounded epithelial cell monolayers. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 3(3):153–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Adra S et al (2010) Development of a three dimensional multi scale computational model of the human epidermis. PLoS ONE 5(1):e8511

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. An G (2009) A model of TLR4 signaling and tolerance using a qualitative, particle-event-based method: introduction of spatially configured stochastic reaction chambers (SCSRC). Math Biosci 217(1):43–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Broderick G et al (2005) A life-like virtual cell membrane using discrete automata. In Silico Biol 5(2):163–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pogson M et al (2008) Introducing spatial information into predictive NF-kappaB modelling: an agent-based approach. PLoS ONE 3(6):e2367

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pogson M et al (2006) Formal agent-based modelling of intracellular chemical interactions. Biosystems 85(1):37–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ridgway D et al (2008) Coarse-grained molecular simulation of diffusion and reaction kinetics in a crowded virtual cytoplasm. Biophys J 94(10):3748–3759

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Troisi A, Wong V, Ratner MA (2005) An agent-based approach for modeling molecular self-organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(2):255–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dong X et al (2010) Agent-based modeling of endotoxin-induced acute inflammatory response in human blood leukocytes. PLoS ONE 5(2):e9249

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hoehme S, Drasdo D (2010) A cell-based simulation software for multi-cellular systems. Bioinformatics 26(20):2641–2642

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. An G, Christley S (2011) Agent-based modeling and biomedical ontologies: a roadmap. Wiley Interdisc Rev Comput Stat 3(4):343–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Solovyev A et al (2011) SPARK: a framework for multi-scale agent-based biomedical modeling. Int J Agent Technol Syst 2(3):18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Railsback SF, Lytinen SL, Jackson SK (2006) Agent-based simulation platforms: review and development recommendations. Simulation 82(9):609–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Vodovotz Y et al (2009) Mechanistic simulations of inflammation: current state and future prospects. Math Biosci 217(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nathan C (2002) Points of control in inflammation. Nature 420(6917):846–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Schlag G, Redl H (1996) Mediators of injury and inflammation. World J Surg 20(4):406–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Matzinger P (2002) The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science 296(5566):301–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Santos CC et al (2005) Bench-to-bedside review: biotrauma and modulation of the innate immune response. Crit Care 9(3):280–286

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Medzhitov R (2008) Origin and physiological roles of inflammation. Nature 454(7203):428–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Oviedo JA, Wolfe MM (2001) Clinical potential of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors. BioDrugs 15(9):563–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Borer JS, Simon LS (2005) Cardiovascular and gastrointestinal effects of COX-2 inhibitors and NSAIDs: achieving a balance. Arthritis Res Ther 7(4):S14–S22

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rychly DJ, DiPiro JT (2005) Infections associated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists. Pharmacotherapy 25(9):1181–1192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Calabrese L (2006) The yin and yang of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Cleve Clin J Med 73(3):251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. An GC (2010) Translational systems biology using an agent-based approach for dynamic knowledge representation: an evolutionary paradigm for biomedical research. Wound Repair Regen 18(1):8–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Li NY et al (2008) A patient-specific in silico model of inflammation and healing tested in acute vocal fold injury. PLoS ONE 3(7):e2789

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Li NY et al (2010) Bio simulation of inflammation and healing in surgically injured vocal folds. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119(6):412–423

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Seal JB et al (2010) The molecular Koch’s postulates and surgical infection: a view forward. Surgery 147(6):757–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wendelsdorf K et al (2011) Enteric immunity simulator: a tool for in silico study of gut immunopathologies. Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Blacksburg, p 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  62. Seal JB et al (2011) Agent-based dynamic knowledge representation of pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence activation in the stressed gut: towards characterizing host-pathogen interactions in gut-derived sepsis. Theor Biol Med Model 8:33

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kim M et al (2012) Immature oxidative stress management as a unifying principle in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis: insights from an agent-based model. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 13(1):18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Segovia-Juarez JL, Ganguli S, Kirschner D (2004) Identifying control mechanisms of granuloma formation during M. tuberculosis infection using an agent-based model. J Theor Biol 231(3):357–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Brown BN et al (2011) An agent-based model of inflammation and fibrosis following particulate exposure in the lung. Math Biosci 231(2):186–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Deitch EA (2010) Gut lymph and lymphatics: a source of factors leading to organ injury and dysfunction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1207(Suppl 1):E103–E111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Grimm V et al (2010) The ODD protocol: a review and first update. Ecol Model 221:2760–2768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wilensky U, Rand W (2009) An introduction to agent-based modeling: modeling natural, social and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  69. van oud Alblas AB, van Furth R (1979) Origin, kinetics, and characteristics of pulmonary macrophages in the normal steady state. J Exp Med 149(6):1504–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zeigler B, Praehofer H, Kim TG (2000) Theory of modeling and simulation: integrating discrete event and continuous complex dynamic systems, vol 2. Elsevier, Sas Diego, p 510

    Google Scholar 

  71. Balci O (2001) A methodology for certification of modeling and simulation applications. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 11(4):352–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Hinkelmann F et al (2011) A mathematical framework for agent based models of complex biological networks. Bull Math Biol 73(7):1583–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Richards RS et al (2008) Data-parallel techniques for agent-based tissue modeling on graphical processing units. In: Design engineering technical conference and computers and information in engineering conference. New York

    Google Scholar 

  74. Richmond P et al (2010) High performance cellular level agent-based simulation with FLAME for the GPU. Briefings Bioinform 11(3):334–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Christley S et al (2010) Integrative multicellular biological modeling: a case study of 3D epidermal development using GPU algorithms. BMC Syst Biol 4:107

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Christley S, An G (2011) A proposal for augmenting biological model construction with a semi-intelligent computational modeling assistant. Comput Math Organ Theor 17(4):1–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary An .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

An, G., Wandling, M., Christley, S. (2013). Agent-Based Modeling Approaches to Multi-Scale Systems Biology: An Example Agent-Based Model of Acute Pulmonary Inflammation. In: Prokop, A., Csukás, B. (eds) Systems Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6803-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics