Skip to main content

Does the Countryside Still Feed the Country? Producing and Reproducing the Rural in Transylvania

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shaping Rural Areas in Europe

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 107))

Abstract

This chapter presents the contradictions between the ideas of new rurality and the responses of rural people. The anthropological fieldwork carried out by the author in an agrarian village in Central Transylvania suggests a relatively wide gap between these new ideas and the actual rural conditions. The general expectations concerning rurality (expectations of rural tourism and of nonconventional agriculture) and inappropriate agrarian policies (national and European directives) fail to recognise the complexity of rural processes. Small-scale farming in domestic units is marginalised, but the people of this village still perceive it as the main component of rural life. Rural people have to answer these new challenges, whilst they lack resources both in terms of knowledge and economic capital. Consequently, they await help from outside and rely on external interventions in many regards that lead to the preservation of the ‘subaltern state’ of rurality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In order to protect my informants, I use a pseudonym.

  2. 2.

    The famous Romanian poet Lucian Blaga (1972: 2) affirmed that the ‘eternity was born in the village’.

  3. 3.

    The idea that the ‘true Romania can be found best in the villages’ is quite widespread in the discourse of tourism operators. See: http://think.hotnews.ro/turism-nemtesc-in-transilvania-%E2%80%9Cadevarata-romanie-poate-fi-descoperita-numai-la-sat%E2%80%9D.html. Accessed 15 June 2012.

  4. 4.

    Considering data from the 2011 Agricultural Census and my own interviews.

  5. 5.

    Specialists estimate that the rate of imported foods is between 70 and 90 %. See: http://www.business24.ro/macroeconomie/inflatie/criza-alimentara-ameninta-romania-scaderea-tva-ului-singura-solutie-1510815. Accessed September 11, 2012.

  6. 6.

    The data in this section are from the website (and the subpages) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (www.madr.ro).

  7. 7.

    But from the number of the economic units (one million on average) that applied for funds and from the property relations (concentration of land, presence of large estates), one may formulate the hypothesis that the percentage of people involved is lower than the percentage of land involved.

  8. 8.

    The equal of 17,000 Euros in old Romanian lei.

  9. 9.

    People met only the Romanian associate.

  10. 10.

    Old measurement unit for dry agricultural products, equivalent to 20 L.

  11. 11.

    The official commercial of Romanian tourism called ‘Romania. The Land of Choice’ comprises images from the shores of the Black Sea, an urban discotheque, but the rest of the images present the natural and built values of Romania, in one world: the ‘rural’.

    Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzeKCMNYBew. Accessed 15 June 2012.

  12. 12.

    There are no expensive museums, theme parks or programmes offered to tourists and, except few cases, the services are also in medium category or below.

References

  • Blaga, L. (1972). Izvoade – Eseuri, Conferinţe, Articole [Essays, conferences, articles]. Bucureşti: Editura Minerva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boia, L. (2001). History and myth in Romanian consciousness. Budapest: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloke, P., Doel, M., Matless, D., Phillips, M., & Thrift, N. (1994). Writing the rural: Five cultural geographies. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, K. (2011). Peasants into European farmers? EU integration in the Carpathian Mountains of Romania. Berlin/Zürich: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, B., Wornell, R., & Youell, R. (2006). Re-conceptualising rural resources as countryside capital: The case of rural tourism. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, T. (1991). Construction of the ‘folk cultural heritage’ in Hungary and rival versions of national identity. Ethnologia Europaea, 21, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horáková, H., & Boscoboinik, A. (2012). Introduction. In A. Boscoboinik & H. Horáková (Eds.), From production to consumption: Transformation of rural communities (pp. 9–18). Berlin/Zürich: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, D. (2005). Erdélyi falvak a 21. században [Transylvian villages in the 21st century]. Magyar Kisebbség, 10, 60–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, N. (2006). Cultural tourism: Aspects of authenticity and commodification. In M. Smith & M. Robinson (Eds.), Cultural tourism in a changing world: Politics, participation and (Re)presentation (pp. 177–190). Clevedon: Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, J., Lowe, P., Ward, N., & Marsden, T. (2003). The differentiated countryside. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. (1996). Discourses of rurality: Loose talk or social struggle? Journal of Rural Studies, 12, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösener, W. (1994). The peasantry of Europe. Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, Á. (2009). Kooperáló közösségek. Munkavégzés és kapcsolatok a falusi gazdálkodásban [Cooperating communities: Work and relations in rural economy]. Târgu Mureş: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó, Á. (2012). Where are the tourists? Shifting production, changing localities in a Szekler village. In A. Boscoboinik & H. Horáková (Eds.), From production to consumption: Transformation of rural communities (pp. 63–78). Berlin/Zürich: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnock, D. (2006). The economy of East Central Europe, 1815–1989 (Stages of transformation in a peripheral region). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulin, R. (1995). Invention and representation as cultural capital: Southwest French winegrowing history. American Anthropologist, 97, 519–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verdery, K. (2003). The vanishing hectare: Property and value in postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the Hungarian Academy of Sciences for the Bolyai János Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Árpád Töhötöm Szabó .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szabó, Á.T. (2013). Does the Countryside Still Feed the Country? Producing and Reproducing the Rural in Transylvania. In: Silva, L., Figueiredo, E. (eds) Shaping Rural Areas in Europe. GeoJournal Library, vol 107. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6796-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics