Advertisement

Social Exchange Theory

  • Karen S. Cook
  • Coye Cheshire
  • Eric R. W. Rice
  • Sandra Nakagawa
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

Much of social life involves interactions between individuals or corporate actors in dyads, groups, organizations or networks that can be viewed as social exchanges. This chapter presents an overview of the main theories of social exchange focusing on the key contributors in sociology, including George Homans, Peter Blau, Richard M. Emerson and those whose work subsequently built on their original formulations. The theories that have been developed in recent decades have focused on the social structures created by repeated exchanges and the ways in which these structures both constrain and enable actors to exercise power and influence. Other related social processes addressed within the exchange tradition include interpersonal commitment, trust, fairness, procedural and distributive justice, coalition formation and collective action. Recent work also focuses on emotions and their role in social exchange. The methodological challenges of studying social exchange in the laboratory and in the world outside the lab are addressed as well as links between exchange theory and topics under study by economic sociologists and network scholars more broadly, including Internet-mediated exchanges and their growing significance.

Keywords

Distributive Justice Social Exchange Exchange Network Exchange Theory Exchange Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, J., Munch, R., Smelser, N., & Giesen, B. (1990). The micro-macro link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1981). Bargaining: Power, tactics and outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Bearman, P. (1997). Generalized exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1383–1415.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, J., Cohen, B., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Jr., Anderson, B., & Cohen, B. (1972). Structural aspects of distributive justice: A status value formation. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1992). The core as a solution to exclusionary networks. Social Networks, 14, 231–243.Google Scholar
  8. Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1993). Game-theory models for exchange networks: Experimental results. Sociological Perspectives, 36, 117–135.Google Scholar
  9. Bienenstock, E. J., & Bonacich, P. (1997). Network exchange as a cooperative game. Rationality and Society, 9, 937–965.Google Scholar
  10. Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, P. M. (1986). Exchange and power in social life (2nd printing). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  13. Borch, C., & Willer, D. (2006). Power, embedded games and coalition formation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 30, 77–111.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., Fang, W., & Lu, X. (2009). Supervisor-subordinate guanxi: Developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 375–399.Google Scholar
  15. Cheshire, C. V. (2005). A sociological analysis of generalized information exchange. Stanford University.Google Scholar
  16. Cheshire, C., & Antin, J. (2009). Order, coordination and uncertainty. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), eTrust: Forming relationships in the online world (pp. 266–291). New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Cheshire, C., & Cook, K. S. (2004). The emergence of trust networks under uncertainty–Implications for internet interactions. Analyse & Kritik, 26(1), 220–240.Google Scholar
  18. Cheshire, C., Gerbasi, A., & Cook, K. S. (2010). Trust and transitions in modes of social exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 176–195.Google Scholar
  19. Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721–739.Google Scholar
  20. Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1984). Exchange networks and the analysis of complex organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 3, 1–30.Google Scholar
  21. Cook, K. S., Emerson, R. M., Gillmore, M. R., & Yamagishi, T. (1983). The distribution of power in exchange networks: Theory and experimental results. The American Journal of Sociology, 89, 275–305.Google Scholar
  22. Cook, K. S., & Gerbasi, A. (2006). Homans and Emerson on power: Out of the Skinner box. In A. Javier Trevino (Ed.), George C. Homans: History, theory and method (pp. 157–176). New York: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Cook, K. S., & Gillmore, M. R. (1984). Power, dependence and coalitions. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (pp. 27–58). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cook, K. S., & Hardin, R. (2001). Norms of cooperativeness and networks of trust. In M. Hechter & K.-D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 327–347). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Cook, K. S., & Hegtvedt, K. A. (1986). Justice and power: An exchange analysis. In H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 19–41). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  26. Cook, K. S., & Yamagishi, T. (1992). Power in exchange networks: A power-dependence formulation. Social Networks, 14, 245–265.Google Scholar
  27. Cook, K. S., Yamagishi, T., Cheshire, C., Cooper, R., Matsuda, M., & Mashima, R. (2005). Trust building via risk taking: A cross-societal experiment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(2), 121–142.Google Scholar
  28. De Jong, J., Schalk, R., & De Cuyper, N. (2009). Balanced versus unbalanced psychological contracts in temporary and permanent employment: Associations with employee attitudes. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 329–351.Google Scholar
  29. Ekeh, P. (1974). Social exchange theory: The two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.Google Scholar
  31. Emerson, R. (1972a). Exchange theory, Part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 38–57). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  32. Emerson, R. (1972b). Exchange theory, Part II: Exchange relations and networks. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 58–87). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  33. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.Google Scholar
  34. Emerson, R. (1987). Toward a theory of value in social exchange. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Social exchange theory (pp. 11–58). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Faust, K., & Wasserman, S. (1992). Centrality and prestige: A review and synthesis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 4, 23–78.Google Scholar
  36. Friedkin, N. E. (1992). An expected value model of social power: Predictions for selected exchange networks. Social Networks, 14, 213–229.Google Scholar
  37. Friedkin, N. E. (1993). An expected value model of social exchange outcomes. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (pp. 163–193). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  38. Guseva, A., & Rona-Tas, A. (2001). Uncertainty, risk, and trust: Russian and American credit card markets compared. American Sociological Review, 66, 623–646.Google Scholar
  39. Harkness, S. (2011). Consequences of rewards: The creation, perpetuation and erosion of social inequality. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  40. Heath, A. F. (1976). Rational choice and social exchange: A critique of exchange theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Heckathorn, D. D. (1984). A formal theory of social exchange: Process and outcome. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 5, 145–180.Google Scholar
  42. Heckathorn, D. D. (1985). Power and trust in social exchange. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes(pp. 143–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  43. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.Google Scholar
  44. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  45. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior and its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  46. Homans, G. C. (1984). Coming to my senses: The autobiography of a sociologist. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  47. Huber, J. (1991). Macro-micro linkages in sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Jasso, G. (1980). A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review, 45, 3–32.Google Scholar
  49. Jasso, G. (1986). A new representation of the just term in distributive justice theory: Its properties and operation in theoretical derivation and empirical estimation. Mathematical Sociology, 12, 251–274.Google Scholar
  50. Jasso, G. (1998). Studying justice: Cross-country data for empirical justice analysis. Social Justice Research, 11, 193–209.Google Scholar
  51. Jasso, G. (2001). Rule finding about rule making: Comparison processes and the making of rules. In M. Hechler & K.-D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 348–393). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Kollock, P. (1994). The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. The American Journal of Sociology, 100, 313–345.Google Scholar
  53. Kollock, P. (1999a). The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 220–239). London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kollock, P. (1999b). The production of trust in online markets. In E. J. Lawler, M. Macy, S. Thyne, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes (pp. 99–123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  55. Kuwabara, K. (2011). Cohesion, cooperation, and the value of doing things together: How economic exchange creates relational bonds. American Sociological Review, 76, 560–580.Google Scholar
  56. Lauterbach, D., Truong, H., Shah, T., & Adamic, L. (2009). Surfing a web of trust: Reputation and reciprocity on couchsurfing.com. In Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on computational science and engineering (pp. 346–353).Google Scholar
  57. Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352.Google Scholar
  58. Lawler, E. J., Ford, R. S., & Blegen, M. A. (1988). Coercive capability in conflict: A test of bilateral deterrence versus conflict spiral theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 93–107.Google Scholar
  59. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2008). Social exchange and micro social order. American Sociological Review, 73, 519–542.Google Scholar
  60. Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1993). Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange. American Sociological Review, 58, 465–481.Google Scholar
  61. Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61, 89–108.Google Scholar
  62. Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1998). Network structure and emotion in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 63, 871–894.Google Scholar
  63. Lawler, E. J., Yoon, J., & Thye, S. R. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 106, 616–657.Google Scholar
  64. Leik, R. K. (1992). New directions for network exchange theory: Strategic manipulation of network linkages. Social Networks, 14, 309–323.Google Scholar
  65. Leik, R., & Leik, S. (1972). Interpersonal commitment as a balancing mechanism in social exchange. Conference presentation at Pacific Sociological Association, Scottsdale, Arizona.Google Scholar
  66. Lovaglia, M. J. (1994). Relating power to status. Advances in Group Processes, 11, 87–111.Google Scholar
  67. Lovaglia, M. J. (1995). Power and status: Exchange, attribution, and expectation states. Small Group Research, 26, 400–426.Google Scholar
  68. Macy, M. W., & Skvoretz, J. (1998). The evolution of trust and cooperation between strangers: A computational model. American Sociological Review, 63, 638–660.Google Scholar
  69. Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the western pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melansian New Guinea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Mark, N. P. (2002). Cultural transmission, disproportionate prior exposure, and the evolution of cooperation. American Sociological Review, 67, 323–344.Google Scholar
  71. Mark, N. P. (2003). Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. American Sociological Review, 68, 319–345.Google Scholar
  72. Markovsky, B., Skvoretz, J., Willer, D., Lovaglia, M. J., & Erger, J. (1993). The seeds of weak power: An extension of network exchange theory. American Sociological Review, 58, 197–209.Google Scholar
  73. Markovsky, B., Willer, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 5, 101–117.Google Scholar
  74. Mauss, M. (1923). Essais sur le don. formes et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. In Sociologie et Anthrophologie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  75. Molm, L. D. (1979). The effects of reinforcement differences and disruptions of social exchange in an alternative task situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 158–171.Google Scholar
  76. Molm, L. D. (1980). The effects of structural variations in social reinforcement contingencies on exchange and cooperation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 269–282.Google Scholar
  77. Molm, L. D. (1985). Relative effects of individual dependencies: Further tests of the relation between power imbalance and power use. Social Forces, 63, 810–837.Google Scholar
  78. Molm, L. (1988). The structure and use of power: A comparison of reward and punishment power. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 108–122.Google Scholar
  79. Molm, L. (1990). Structure, action, and outcomes: The dynamics of power in social exchange. American Sociological Review, 55, 427–447.Google Scholar
  80. Molm, L. (1994). Is punishment effective? Coercive strategies in social exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 75–94.Google Scholar
  81. Molm, L. (1997a). Coercive power in social exchange. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Molm, L. (1997b). Risk and power use: Constraints on the use of coercion in exchange. American Sociological Review, 62, 113–133.Google Scholar
  83. Molm, L. D. (2003). Power, trust, and fairness: Comparisons of negotiated and reciprocal exchange. Advances in Group Processes, 20, 31–65.Google Scholar
  84. Molm, L. D. (2007). Experiments on exchange relations and exchange networks in sociology. In M. Webster & J. Sell (Eds.), Laboratory experiments in the social sciences (pp. 379–406). Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar
  85. Molm, L. (2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 119–131.Google Scholar
  86. Molm, L., Collett, J., & Schaefer, D. (2007). Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. The American Journal of Sociology, 113, 205–242.Google Scholar
  87. Molm, L., & Cook, K. S. (1995). Social exchange and exchange networks. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 209–235). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  88. Molm, L., Peterson, G., & Takahashi, N. (1999). Power in negotiated and reciprocal exchange. American Sociological Review, 64, 876–890.Google Scholar
  89. Molm, L., Quist, T. M., & Wiseley, P. A. (1994). Imbalanced structures, unfair strategies: Power and justice in social exchange. American Sociological Review, 49, 98–121.Google Scholar
  90. Molm, L., Takahashi, N., & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. The American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1396–1427.Google Scholar
  91. Molm, L., Whitham, M. M., & Melamed, D. (2012). Forms of exchange and integrative bonds: Effects of history and embeddedness. American Sociological Review, 77, 141–165.Google Scholar
  92. Montgomery, J. (1996). The structure of social exchange networks: A game-theoretic reformulation of Blau’s model. Sociological Methodology, 26, 193–225.Google Scholar
  93. Radaev, V. (2002). Entrepreneurial strategies and the structure of transaction costs in Russian business. Problems of Economic Transition, 44, 57–84.Google Scholar
  94. Radaev, V. (2003). Coping with distrust and contract infringement in the emerging Russian markets. In R. Hardin (Ed.), Distrust. New York: Russell Sage Corporation.Google Scholar
  95. Rice, E. R. W. (2002). The effect of social uncertainty in networks of social exchange. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  96. Ruef, M. (2003). A sociological perspective on strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 1(2), 241–251.Google Scholar
  97. Shah, S. K., & Levine, S. S. (2003, August). Towards a theory of large-scale generalized exchange. Conference presentation at American Sociological Association, Theoretical Issues in Economic Sociology Session. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  98. Skvoretz, J., & Willer, D. (1991). Power in exchange networks: Setting and structural variations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 224–238.Google Scholar
  99. Skvoretz, J., & Willer, D. (1993). Exclusion and power: A test of four theories or power in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 58, 801–818.Google Scholar
  100. Stolte, J. R., & Emerson, R. M. (1977). Structural inequality: Position and power in network structures. In R. L. Hamblin & J. H. Kunkel (Eds.), Behavioral theory in sociology (pp. 117–138). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  101. Suhonen, E., Lampinen, A., Cheshire, C., & Antin, J. (2010, November). Everyday favors: A case study of a local online gift exchange system. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on Supporting group work (pp. 11–20).Google Scholar
  102. Takahashi, N. (2000). The emergence of generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1105–1134.Google Scholar
  103. Takahashi, N., & Yamagishi, T. (1996). Social relational foundations of altruistic behavior. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 1–11.Google Scholar
  104. Takahashi, N., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Voluntary formation of a generalized exchange system: An experimental study of discriminating altruism. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 70, 9–16.Google Scholar
  105. Taylor, L. S., Fiore, A. T., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Cheshire, C. (2011). “Out of my league”: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(7), 942–954.Google Scholar
  106. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  107. Thye, S. R. (2000). A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 65, 407–432.Google Scholar
  108. Thye, S. R., Willer, D., & Markovsky, B. (2006). From status to power: New models at the intersection of two theories. Social Forces, 84, 1471–1495.Google Scholar
  109. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698.Google Scholar
  110. Whitmeyer, J. M. (1997a). Applying general equilibrium analysis & game theory to exchange networks. Current Research in Social Psychology, 2(2).Google Scholar
  111. Whitmeyer, J. M. (1997b). The power of the middleman—A theoretical analysis. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22(1), 59–90.Google Scholar
  112. Willer, D., & Anderson, B. (1981). Networks, exchange and coercion: The elementary theory and its applications. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  113. Willer, D., Markovsky, B., & Patton, T. (1989). Power structures: Derivations and applications of elementary theory. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations (pp. 313–353). New York, NY: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  114. Willer, R., Flynn, F. J., & Zak, S. (2012). Structure, identity, and solidarity: A comparative field study of generalized and direct exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(1), 119–155.Google Scholar
  115. Yamagishi, T. (1995). Social dilemmas. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  116. Yamagishi, T., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(4), 235–248.Google Scholar
  117. Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S., & Watabe, M. (1998). Uncertainty, trust and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. The American Journal of Sociology, 104, 165–194.Google Scholar
  118. Yamagishi, T., Gillmore, M. R., & Cook, K. S. (1988). Network connections and the distribution of power in exchange networks. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 833–851.Google Scholar
  119. Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Takagishi, H., Shinada, M., Tanida, S., & Cook, K. S. (2009). The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(28), 11520–11523.Google Scholar
  120. Ziegler, R. (1990). The Kula: Social order, barter and ceremonial exchange. In M. Hechter, K.-D. Opp, & R. Wippler (Eds.), Social institutions: Their emergence, maintenance and effects. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen S. Cook
    • 1
  • Coye Cheshire
    • 2
  • Eric R. W. Rice
    • 3
  • Sandra Nakagawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.School of InformationUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.School of Social WorkUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations