Advertisement

Reestablishing the Role of the University Professor in the Laboratory School: Retooling in an Elementary Classroom

  • Kimberly Lott
Chapter
Part of the ASTE Series in Science Education book series (ASTE, volume 1)

Abstract

In order to more effectively prepare future science teachers and more adequately provide professional development for existing teachers, Kimberly Lott has always viewed research through a “teacher lens.” This lens was fine-tuned by her previous experiences as a middle and high school science teacher and the commitment to remain active in local schools. When her appointment changed from secondary to elementary science, Dr. Lott realized that her “teacher lens” was out of focus, and she needed experience in elementary classrooms. This chapter describes Kim’s experiences working with the teachers at the Edith Bowen Laboratory School on the campus of Utah State University. Dr. Lott describes how she revised her approach to reflect the original intent of the laboratory school as a place to apply research to practice and how experiences teaching children have focused her vision as a science teacher educator.

Keywords

Science Teaching Science Teacher Elementary Teacher Alternative Conception Elementary Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bonar, B. D. (1992). The role of laboratory schools in American education. National Association of Laboratory Schools Journal, 17(1), 42–53.Google Scholar
  2. Cassidy, J., & Sanders, J. (2002). A university lab school for the 21st century development center. EarlycChildhood literacy: Programs & strategies to develop cultural, linguistic, scientific and healthcare literacy for young children and their families, 2001 yearbook. Corpus Christi: Center for Educational Development and Evaluation, Texas A&M University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 468 858).Google Scholar
  3. Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edith Bowen Laboratory School (EBLS). (2012). Retrieved March 13, 2012, from http://edithbowen.usu.edu/htm/about
  5. Flick, L.B. (1997, March). Focusing research on teaching practices in support of inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, C. L. (1986). Status of laboratory schools. Jacksonville: Florida Institute of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 277 691).Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, W. F. (2006). The laboratory school: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses. (AAT 3232513).Google Scholar
  8. Lott, K. H. (2011). FIRE UP the Inquiry. Lose the routine, tweak your “cookbook lab”, and reach a level of open inquiry with these strategies used during a unit on heat. Science and Children, 48(7), 29–33.Google Scholar
  9. Lott, K. H., & Jensen, A. (2012). Changes matter! Addressing misconceptions students have about physical and chemical changes. Science and Children, 50, 54–61.Google Scholar
  10. Lott, K. H., & Read, S. (2012). “Is a mealworm really a worm?” Introducing science notebooks to novice writers. Science and Children, 49(5), 32–37.Google Scholar
  11. Lott, K. H., & Wallin, L. (2012). Modeling the states of matter in a first-grade classroom. Science Activities, 49, 108–116.Google Scholar
  12. Olson, J. (1981). Teacher influence in the classroom: A context for understanding curriculum translation. Instructional Science, 10, 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rivard, L., & Straw, S. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84(5), 566–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tanner, L. (1997). Dewey’s laboratory school: Lessons for today. New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Vosniadou, C., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1213–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teacher Education and LeadershipUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations