Abstract
If one can describe the evolution of ever more complex and anonymous social structures in general terms as the path of social evolution, then societies have evolved from clan and tribal societies that can be described as being pre-feudal because they are based on constantly renegotiated social alliances, to more complex societies where these renegotiations of social arrangements have settled down into rather hereditary and then later on bureaucratic social class and political hierarchies that can be described as feudal societies, to post-feudal societies that have evolved beyond this so that bureaucratic structures become so fine-tuned that they are used to produce checks and balances in society between various social institutions. The psychological ramifications of this path of evolution are discussed with emphasis on the differences between societies that induce authoritarian personalities, and those that induce narcissistic personalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bellah, R. (1991). Beyond belief: Essays on religion in a post-traditional world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bendix, R. (1952). Compliant behavior and individual personality. American Journal of Sociology, 58, 292–303.
Eagleton, T. (2003). Sweet violence: The idea of the tragic. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (2005). The winner-take-all society: Why the few at the top get much more than the rest of us. New York: Penguin.
Ingham, J. M. (1996). Psychological anthropology reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lasch, C. (1991). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: W.W. Norton.
LeVine, R. A. (1982). Culture, behavior, and personality: An introduction to the comparative study of psychosocial adaptation (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Rosen, L. (2008). Varieties of Muslim experience: Encounters with Arab political and cultural life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shapiro, D. (2000). Dynamics of character: Self-regulation and psychopathology. New York: Basic Books.
Thompson, M. G. (1985). The death of desire: A study in psychopathology. New York: New York University Press.
Wallace, A. F. C. (1970). Culture and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
Weber, M. (1954). Max Weber on law in Economy and Society. M. Rheinstein (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weber, M. (1963). The sociology of religion (trans: Fischoff, E.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Braun, J. (2013). Limited Alternatives and Personal Identity: The Relation Between Freedom and Personal Responsibility. In: Democratic Culture and Moral Character. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6754-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6754-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6753-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6754-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)