Skip to main content

The Meat Crisis: The Ethical Dimensions of Animal Welfare, Climate Change, and Future Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sustainable Food Security in the Era of Local and Global Environmental Change

Abstract

The Meat Crisis is not the lack of meat to feed an increasingly carnivorous human population, but the absolute impossibility of sustaining the earth if we do not begin to limit our consumption of animal products. This paper explains why there is a crisis and it also offers equitable policy options to deal with this crisis. Most human activities have an ethical dimension. In farming, there are ethical issues regarding care of the soil and natural resources. Livestock farming carries an extra ethical dimension as it deals with the lives and well-being of other sentient beings. In view of the threat from livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), it is important that agriculture adapts and mitigates its negative impacts. Some promote the view that industrialisation of livestock farming is the best way forward. However this proposed partial solution is myopic and totally fails to take account of the growing body of scientific research on the health and welfare of farm animals. The ethical question may be: Is it right to push farm animals to ever greater levels of productivity if this undermines their well-being? Seeking ever greater levels of productivity of meat and dairy products may also lead to adverse health effects on humans from over-consumption. Increasing the levels of obesity and allied diseases such as Type 2 diabetes, colon cancer and heart disease may place a great strain on the health systems of developing countries. In fact greater productivity and increased consumption are at the root of the unsustainable Meat Crisis. To overcome this crisis we need to seek ethical answers that promote agricultural systems in order to benefit the environment, protect the welfare of animals and produce health-giving products for our populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Batz, M. B., Hoffmann, S., & Morris, J. G. (2011). Ranking the risk: The 10 pathogen-food combinations with the greatest burden on public health. Gainesville: Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida. http://tinyurl.com/cbhuptj

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, A. J., Leach, K. A., Breen, J. E., Green, L. E., & Green, M. J. (2007). Survey of the incidence and aetiology of mastitis on dairy farms in England and Wales. Veterinary Record, 160, 253–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, M. (2009). Cutting carbon, improving health. The Lancet, 374(9705), 1870–1871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, M. J., Downham, D. Y., Faull, W. B., Hughes, J. W., et al. (1996). Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Veterinary Record, 138, 563–567. doi:10.1136/vr.138.23.563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Compassion in World Farming. (2011). Antibiotics in farm animal production: Public health and animal welfare, published by Compassion in World Farming, Soil Association and Sustain

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservation International (2008), Biological diversity in the Cerrado, in the “Encyclopedia of Earth”. http://tinyurl.com/75hfu99

  • Cross, A. J., Leitzmann, M. F., Gail, M. H., Hollenbeck, A. R., Schatzkin, A., & Sinha, R. (2007). A prospective study of red and processed meat intake in relation to cancer risk. PLoS Medicine, 4(12), e325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA. (2009a). Scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and welfare on a request from the commission on the risk assessment of the impact of housing, nutrition and feeding, management and genetic selection on leg and locomotion problems in dairy cows. EFSA Journal, 1142, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA. (2009b). Scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and welfare on a request from European commission on the overall effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. The EFSA Journal, 1143, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA. (2010). EFSA panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW): Scientific opinion on the influence of genetic parameters on the welfare and the resistance to stress of commercial broilers. The EFSA Journal, 8(7), 1666 [82 pp]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1666. www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1666.htm

  • FAOSTAT. (2012, February 23). Producing animals/slaughtered–chicken meat. FAO Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming. (2011). Final project report. London: The Government Office for Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace International. (2006). Eating up the Amazon. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Greenpeace International. www.greenpeace.org/forests

  • Hoekstra, A. (2010). The water footprint of animal products. In J. D’Silva & J. Webster (Eds.), The Meat Crisis: Developing more sustainable production and consumption. London: Earthscan, Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, T. G., Kestin, S. C., Haslam, S. M., Brown, S. N., Green, L. E., et al. (2008). Leg disorders in broiler chickens: Prevalence, risk factors and prevention. PLoS One, 3(2), e1545. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Saveniji, H. H. G. (2008). Food consumption patterns and their effect on water requirement in China. Hydrology and Earth Systems Science, 12, 887–898. www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/12/887/2008

  • Lundqvist, J., de Fraiture, C., & Molden, D. (2008). Saving water: From field to Fork – Curbing losses and wastage in the food chain. SIWI: SIWI Policy Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, A. J., Powles, J. W., Butler, C. D., & Uauy, R. (2007). Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. The Lancet, 370, 1253–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nellemann, C., MacDevette, M., Manders, T., Eickhout, B., Svihus, B., Prins, A. G., & Kaltenborn, B. P. (Eds.). (2009). The environmental food crisis – The environment’s role in averting future food crises. A UNEP rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal, www.unep.org/pdf/foodcrisis_lores.pdf

  • Nestle, M. (1999). Animal v. plant foods in human diets and health: Is the historical record unequivocal? Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 58, 211–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, C., & Young, R. (2007). MRSA in farm animals and meat: A new threat to human health. Bristol, UK: Soil Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, J., Roland-Holst, D., Pfeiffer, D., Soares-Magalhaes, R., Rushton, J., Graham, J., & Silbergeld, E. (2007). Industrial livestock production and global health risks. Pro-Poor Livestock Policy Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, A. (2001). Social inequalities and the burden of food-related ill-health. Public Health Nutrition, 4(6A), 1371–1373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smil, V. (2000). Feeding the world: A challenge for the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolba, A., & Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1989). The behaviour of pigs in a semi-natural environment. Animal Production, 48, 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA FAS. (2005). Laos: Poultry and Products – Avian influenza 2005 (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service GAIN Report No. LA5001). www.fas.usda.gov/gainfiles/200503/146119131.doc

  • WCRF/AIRC. (2007). Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: A global perspective. World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research. www.dietandcancerreport.org

  • Webster, J. (2005). Animal Welfare: Limping towards Eden. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Cancer Research Fund and the American Institute for Cancer Research. (2007). Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: A global perspective. www.dietandcancerreport.org

  • World Health Organisation. (2006). Obesity and overweight (Factsheet No. 311). www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html

  • WWF. (2011). One planet living. www.oneplanetliving.org/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce D’Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Silva, J. (2013). The Meat Crisis: The Ethical Dimensions of Animal Welfare, Climate Change, and Future Sustainability. In: Behnassi, M., Pollmann, O., Kissinger, G. (eds) Sustainable Food Security in the Era of Local and Global Environmental Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6719-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics