Abstract
This chapter examines the neighbourhood policy environment of Canada. Unlike many of the other Countries considered in this volume, Canada does not have an extensive history of neighbourhood level interventions. Indeed there is a long history of in fighting and tension between the various scales of government and many agencies competing for scarce resources which has lead to a loss of potential. The chapter, therefore, highlights two recent developments which have led to some successful outcomes. Highlighting the importance of three key aspects (Incrementalism, Interscalar Links, Learning from the Local), the examples show how common goals, co-working and local involvement, can be crucial for the delivery of neighbourhood interventions. The first project, the Vancouver Agreement (VA) combined federal and provincial governments and the City of Vancouver to invest in some of the most deprived neighbourhoods in the city. The Agreement has been evaluated as a promising governance model of collaboration to meet community needs and as a “benchmark” for Canadian urban development agreements. The second project, Action for Neighbourhood Change (ANC) was a much larger project and targeted high poverty neighbourhoods in Halifax, Toronto, Thunder Bay, Regina, and Vancouver. It contains valuable insights about how joint work and collaboration actually occurs in terms of operational details like clear communication, transparent decision making, regular information-sharing and knowledge dissemination, continual process monitoring and course corrections. Using these examples, the chapter calls for a more joined up vision of neighbourhood policy and points to the lessons that can be learnt when agencies work towards common goals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2001). Disentangling area effects: Evidence from deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38(11), 2277–2298.
Auditor General of Canada (2005). Chapter 4 – Managing horizontal initiatives. Office of Auditor General of Canada Report.
Bakvis, H., & Juillet, L. (2004). The horizontal challenge: Line departments, central agencies and leadership. Ottawa: Canada School of Public Service.
Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hubner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Rome: Ministry of Economics and Finance.
Beauvais, C., & Jenson, J. (2003). The well-being of children: Are there “neighbourhood effects”? (Discussion Paper F/31). Ottawa: CPRN.
Bellefontaine, T. (2011). Bringing place-based tools to policy: connecting information, knowledge, and decision-making in the Federal Government. Policy Horizons Canada, Workshop Report.
Bernard, P., Charafeddine, R., Frohlich, K. L., Daniel, M., Kestens, Y., & Potvin, L. (2007). Health inequalities and place: A theoretical conception of neighbourhood. Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1839–1852.
Born, P. (Ed.). (2008). Creating vibrant communities. Toronto: BPS Books.
Bradford, N. (2005). Place-based public policy: Towards a new urban and community agenda for Canada (Research Report F/51). Ottawa: CPRN.
Bradford, N. (2008). Rescaling for regeneration? Canada’s Urban Development Agreements. Paper prepared for Canadian Political Science Association Annual Meetings, Vancouver B.C.
Bradford, N. (2011). Public policy in Canada: Bringing place in? In S. Chisholm (Ed.), Investing in better places: International perspectives (pp. 22–36). London: The Smith Institute.
Bradford, N., & Chouinard, J. (2009). Learning through evaluation? Reflections on two federal community-based learning initiatives. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 24(1), 51–77.
Bulthius, M., & Leviten-Reid, E. (2005). Partnering for strong neighbourhoods. Paper presented to International Conference for Integrating Urban Knowledge & Practice, Gothenburg, May 29–June 3.
Cook, D. (2010). Donec prohibiti, procidite: Building a knowledge infrastructure to support place-based policy. Ottawa: Policy Research Initiative.
Donovan, E., & Au, W. (2004). The Vancouver agreement: Moving ideas forward together (Vancouver).
Dunn, J., Bradford, N., & Evans, J. (2010). Place-based policy approaches: Practical lessons and applications. Report submitted to Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Government of Canada.
External Advisory Committee on Cities and Communities (2006). From restless communities to resilient places. Final Report. Ottawa: Infrastructure Canada.
Final Report (1999). Community review of the draft Vancouver Agreement. City of Vancouver, Province of British Columbia, and Government of Canada.
Frelier, C. (2004). Why strong neighbourhoods matter: Implications for policy practice. Toronto: Strong Neighbourhoods Task Force.
Gertler, M. (2001). Urban economy and society in Canada: Flows of people, capital & ideas. Isuma, 2(3), 119–130.
Gorman, C. (2006). Orienteering over new ground: A neighbourhood theory of change. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Gorman, C. (2007). The transition: Final reflections from the action for neighbourhood change research project. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Government of Canada, Govenor General (2010, March 3). A stronger Canada. A stronger economy. Now and for the future. Speech from the Throne.
Gross Stein, J. (2006). Canada by Mondrian: Networked federalism in an era of globalization. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada.
Hulchanski, D. (2007). The three cities within Toronto: Income polarization among Toronto’s neighbourhoods, 1970–2000. Toronto: University of Toronto Centre for Urban and Community Studies.
Jamieson, W., & Kinnon, D. (2007). Action for Neighbourhood Change (ANC) Project: Summative evaluation. Ottawa: JHG Consultants.
Levitan-Reid, E. (2006). Asset-based, resident-led neighbourhood development. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Maclennan, D. (2006). Remaking neighbourhood renewal: Towards creative neighbourhood renewal policies for Britain. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Macleod Institute (2004). In the spirit of the Vancouver Agreement: A case study in governance. Evaluation report prepared for Western Economic Diversification Canada.
Makhoul, A. (2007a). ANC in Scarborough village sets a good example for Toronto neighbourhoods. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Makhoul, A. (2007b). ANC sketches: Building a neighbourhood renewal process. Action for Neighbourhood Change. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Mason, M. (2006). Collaborative partnerships for urban development: A study of the Vancouver Agreement (Research papers in environmental & spatial analysis, No. 108). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
McMurtry, R., & Curling, A. (2008). The review of the roots of youth violence. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
Minister of Labour and Housing (2005, May 9). Government of Canada, United Way and partners establish Action for Neighbourhood Change. News Release.
OECD. (n.d.). Local governance and partnerships: A summary of findings of the OECD study on local partnerships. Paris: LEED Programme.
Oreopoulos, P. (2002). Do neighbourhoods influence long-term labour market success? A comparison of adults who grew in different public housing projects (Research Paper, Catalogue No. 11F0019MIE, No. 185). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Policy Horizons Canada (2010). Sustainable places: Compendium of place-based initiatives in Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
Public Policy Forum. (2008). Collaborative governance and changing federal roles. Ottawa: PPF and PRI Outcomes Report.
Rogers, J. (2001). Governments in progress. Panel presentation to FCM Symposium, “Cities in an Urban Century.”
Ross, N. A., Houle, C., Dunn, J. R., & Aye, M. (2004). Dimensions and dynamics of residential segregation by income in urban Canada, 1991–1996. The Canadian Geographer, 48(4), 433–445.
Saint-Martin, D. (2004). Coordinating interdependence: Governance and social policy redesign in Britain, the European Union and Canada (Social Architecture Papers F/41). Ottawa: CPRN.
Sandercock, L. (2004). Sustaining Canada’s multicultural cities: Learning from the local. Ottawa: Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Seguin, A., & Divay, G. (2003). Urban poverty: Fostering sustainable and supportive communities. Ottawa: CPRN.
Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. (2001). Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy, and the movement for civic renewal. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Statistics Canada (2004, October 18). Study: neighbourhood influence on health in Montreal. The Daily.
Torjman, S. (2005). Policy dialogue. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
Torjman, S. (2007). Shared space: The communities agenda. Ottawa: Renouf.
Tremblay, R., et al. (2001). Multi-level effects on behaviour outcomes in Canadian children. Ottawa: Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada.
van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2012). Introduction. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: new perspectives (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer.
van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2013). Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: new insights for neighbourhood effects research. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: new insights for neighbourhood effects research (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer.
Walker, B., & Sankey, S. (2008). International review of effective governance arrangements for employment-related initiatives (Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Research Report No. 543). London: Department of Work and Pensions.
Walks, R. A., & Bourne, L. S. (2006). Ghettos in Canada’s cities? Racial segregation, ethnic enclaves and poverty concentration in Canadian urban areas. The Canadian Geographer, 50(3), 273–297.
Western Economic Diversification Canada (2004, September 1). Vancouver Agreement wins highest award. Government of Canada News Release.
Willms, J. D. (2002). Vulnerable children: Finding from Canada’s National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science and Business Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bradford, N. (2013). Neighbourhood Revitalization in Canada: Towards Place-Based Policy Solutions. In: Manley, D., van Ham, M., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., Maclennan, D. (eds) Neighbourhood Effects or Neighbourhood Based Problems?. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6695-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6695-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6694-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6695-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)