Skip to main content

Neighbourhood Revitalization in Canada: Towards Place-Based Policy Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter examines the neighbourhood policy environment of Canada. Unlike many of the other Countries considered in this volume, Canada does not have an extensive history of neighbourhood level interventions. Indeed there is a long history of in fighting and tension between the various scales of government and many agencies competing for scarce resources which has lead to a loss of potential. The chapter, therefore, highlights two recent developments which have led to some successful outcomes. Highlighting the importance of three key aspects (Incrementalism, Interscalar Links, Learning from the Local), the examples show how common goals, co-working and local involvement, can be crucial for the delivery of neighbourhood interventions. The first project, the Vancouver Agreement (VA) combined federal and provincial governments and the City of Vancouver to invest in some of the most deprived neighbourhoods in the city. The Agreement has been evaluated as a promising governance model of collaboration to meet community needs and as a “benchmark” for Canadian urban development agreements. The second project, Action for Neighbourhood Change (ANC) was a much larger project and targeted high poverty neighbourhoods in Halifax, Toronto, Thunder Bay, Regina, and Vancouver. It contains valuable insights about how joint work and collaboration actually occurs in terms of operational details like clear communication, transparent decision making, regular information-sharing and knowledge dissemination, continual process monitoring and course corrections. Using these examples, the chapter calls for a more joined up vision of neighbourhood policy and points to the lessons that can be learnt when agencies work towards common goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2001). Disentangling area effects: Evidence from deprived and non-deprived neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38(11), 2277–2298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auditor General of Canada (2005). Chapter 4 – Managing horizontal initiatives. Office of Auditor General of Canada Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakvis, H., & Juillet, L. (2004). The horizontal challenge: Line departments, central agencies and leadership. Ottawa: Canada School of Public Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hubner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. Rome: Ministry of Economics and Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvais, C., & Jenson, J. (2003). The well-being of children: Are there “neighbourhood effects”? (Discussion Paper F/31). Ottawa: CPRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellefontaine, T. (2011). Bringing place-based tools to policy: connecting information, knowledge, and decision-making in the Federal Government. Policy Horizons Canada, Workshop Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, P., Charafeddine, R., Frohlich, K. L., Daniel, M., Kestens, Y., & Potvin, L. (2007). Health inequalities and place: A theoretical conception of neighbourhood. Social Science & Medicine, 65(9), 1839–1852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Born, P. (Ed.). (2008). Creating vibrant communities. Toronto: BPS Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, N. (2005). Place-based public policy: Towards a new urban and community agenda for Canada (Research Report F/51). Ottawa: CPRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, N. (2008). Rescaling for regeneration? Canada’s Urban Development Agreements. Paper prepared for Canadian Political Science Association Annual Meetings, Vancouver B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, N. (2011). Public policy in Canada: Bringing place in? In S. Chisholm (Ed.), Investing in better places: International perspectives (pp. 22–36). London: The Smith Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, N., & Chouinard, J. (2009). Learning through evaluation? Reflections on two federal community-based learning initiatives. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 24(1), 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulthius, M., & Leviten-Reid, E. (2005). Partnering for strong neighbourhoods. Paper presented to International Conference for Integrating Urban Knowledge & Practice, Gothenburg, May 29–June 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. (2010). Donec prohibiti, procidite: Building a knowledge infrastructure to support place-based policy. Ottawa: Policy Research Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, E., & Au, W. (2004). The Vancouver agreement: Moving ideas forward together (Vancouver).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., Bradford, N., & Evans, J. (2010). Place-based policy approaches: Practical lessons and applications. Report submitted to Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • External Advisory Committee on Cities and Communities (2006). From restless communities to resilient places. Final Report. Ottawa: Infrastructure Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Final Report (1999). Community review of the draft Vancouver Agreement. City of Vancouver, Province of British Columbia, and Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frelier, C. (2004). Why strong neighbourhoods matter: Implications for policy practice. Toronto: Strong Neighbourhoods Task Force.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M. (2001). Urban economy and society in Canada: Flows of people, capital & ideas. Isuma, 2(3), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, C. (2006). Orienteering over new ground: A neighbourhood theory of change. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, C. (2007). The transition: Final reflections from the action for neighbourhood change research project. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Canada, Govenor General (2010, March 3). A stronger Canada. A stronger economy. Now and for the future. Speech from the Throne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross Stein, J. (2006). Canada by Mondrian: Networked federalism in an era of globalization. Ottawa: Conference Board of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulchanski, D. (2007). The three cities within Toronto: Income polarization among Toronto’s neighbourhoods, 1970–2000. Toronto: University of Toronto Centre for Urban and Community Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, W., & Kinnon, D. (2007). Action for Neighbourhood Change (ANC) Project: Summative evaluation. Ottawa: JHG Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan-Reid, E. (2006). Asset-based, resident-led neighbourhood development. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclennan, D. (2006). Remaking neighbourhood renewal: Towards creative neighbourhood renewal policies for Britain. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod Institute (2004). In the spirit of the Vancouver Agreement: A case study in governance. Evaluation report prepared for Western Economic Diversification Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhoul, A. (2007a). ANC in Scarborough village sets a good example for Toronto neighbourhoods. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhoul, A. (2007b). ANC sketches: Building a neighbourhood renewal process. Action for Neighbourhood Change. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2006). Collaborative partnerships for urban development: A study of the Vancouver Agreement (Research papers in environmental & spatial analysis, No. 108). London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurtry, R., & Curling, A. (2008). The review of the roots of youth violence. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minister of Labour and Housing (2005, May 9). Government of Canada, United Way and partners establish Action for Neighbourhood Change. News Release.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (n.d.). Local governance and partnerships: A summary of findings of the OECD study on local partnerships. Paris: LEED Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreopoulos, P. (2002). Do neighbourhoods influence long-term labour market success? A comparison of adults who grew in different public housing projects (Research Paper, Catalogue No. 11F0019MIE, No. 185). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policy Horizons Canada (2010). Sustainable places: Compendium of place-based initiatives in Canada. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Policy Forum. (2008). Collaborative governance and changing federal roles. Ottawa: PPF and PRI Outcomes Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J. (2001). Governments in progress. Panel presentation to FCM Symposium, “Cities in an Urban Century.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, N. A., Houle, C., Dunn, J. R., & Aye, M. (2004). Dimensions and dynamics of residential segregation by income in urban Canada, 1991–1996. The Canadian Geographer, 48(4), 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Martin, D. (2004). Coordinating interdependence: Governance and social policy redesign in Britain, the European Union and Canada (Social Architecture Papers F/41). Ottawa: CPRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock, L. (2004). Sustaining Canada’s multicultural cities: Learning from the local. Ottawa: Canadian Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguin, A., & Divay, G. (2003). Urban poverty: Fostering sustainable and supportive communities. Ottawa: CPRN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. (2001). Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy, and the movement for civic renewal. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2004, October 18). Study: neighbourhood influence on health in Montreal. The Daily.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torjman, S. (2005). Policy dialogue. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torjman, S. (2007). Shared space: The communities agenda. Ottawa: Renouf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R., et al. (2001). Multi-level effects on behaviour outcomes in Canadian children. Ottawa: Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2012). Introduction. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: new perspectives (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2013). Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: new insights for neighbourhood effects research. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: new insights for neighbourhood effects research (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Sankey, S. (2008). International review of effective governance arrangements for employment-related initiatives (Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Research Report No. 543). London: Department of Work and Pensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walks, R. A., & Bourne, L. S. (2006). Ghettos in Canada’s cities? Racial segregation, ethnic enclaves and poverty concentration in Canadian urban areas. The Canadian Geographer, 50(3), 273–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Economic Diversification Canada (2004, September 1). Vancouver Agreement wins highest award. Government of Canada News Release.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D. (2002). Vulnerable children: Finding from Canada’s National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Bradford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science and Business Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bradford, N. (2013). Neighbourhood Revitalization in Canada: Towards Place-Based Policy Solutions. In: Manley, D., van Ham, M., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., Maclennan, D. (eds) Neighbourhood Effects or Neighbourhood Based Problems?. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6695-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics