The Role of Neighbourhoods in Shaping Crime and Perceptions of Crime

  • Ian Brunton-Smith
  • Alex Sutherland
  • Jonathan Jackson
Chapter

Abstract

Neighbourhood context plays an important role in the development of the perceptions of crime. To understand how neighbourhood contexts can influence crime, the authors present four major theories through which neighbourhood content is mediated to individual perceptions: social disorganisation, subcultural diversity, low level disorder and, defensible space. The authors focus on the need to improve the estimation of neighbourhood effects with regard to individual perceptions of crime. Reviewing current literature, they highlight a common set of neighbourhood effects problems including the issue of relating multiple levels in a single model, the problem of selection bias, and the identification of adequate neighbourhood units for analysis. In the analysis, UK administrative geography is adopted as a means to represent the neighbourhood, and a multilevel model is fitted. The final part of the chapter deals with the policies that have been pursued to ameliorate neighbourhood problems associated with crime. The focus of the policy discussion is UK centred, and the development of neighbourhood policing teams is discussed. In conclusion, the authors highlight the complexity that remains in developing understanding of neighbourhood perceptions of crime. This is largely a result of the multiple influencing factors that are related to individual perceptions of crime but rarely included explicitly in the models that seek to report the links between people and the places that they live.

References

  1. Adams, R., & Serpe, R. (2000). Social integration, fear of crime, and life satisfaction. Sociological Perspectives, 43, 605–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, J., & Bottoms, A. E. (1976). The urban criminal. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  3. Batty, E., Beatty, C., Foden, M., Lawless, P., Pearson, S., & Wilson, I. (2010a). Involving local people in regeneration: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme. The New Deal for Communities National Evaluation: Final report (Vol. 2). Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  4. Batty, E., Beatty, C., Foden, M., Lawless, P., Pearson, S., & Wilson, I. (2010b). Making deprived areas better places to live: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme. The New Deal for Communities National Evaluation: Final report (Vol. 3). Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  5. Batty, E., Beatty, C., Foden, M., Lawless, P., Pearson, S., & Wilson, I. (2010c). The New Deal for Communities Experience: A final assessment. The New Deal for Communities Evaluation: Final report (Vol. 7). Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
  6. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1981). Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Brunton-Smith, I., & Jackson, J. (2012). Urban fear and its roots in place. In V. Ceccato (Ed.), Urban fabric of crime and fear (pp. 55–82). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Brunton-Smith, I., & Sturgis, P. (2011). Do neighbourhoods generate fear of crime? An empirical test using the British Crime Survey. Criminology, 49(2), 331–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bullock, K., Clarke, R., & Tilley, N. (Eds.). (2010). Situational prevention of organised crime. Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  10. Bursik, R. J. (1988). Social disorganisation and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bursik, R. J., & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighbourhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  12. Carr, P. (2005). Clean streets: Controlling crime, maintaining order and building community activism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chaskin, R. (1998). Defining neighbourhoods. Paper presented at American Planning Association Casey Symposium on Indicators. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  14. Covington, J., & Taylor, R. B. (1991). Fear of crime in urban residential neighbourhoods: Implications of between- and within-neighbourhood sources for current models. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(2), 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crawford, A., & Lister, S. (2004). The extended policing family: Visible patrols in residential areas. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Dennis, N. (1997). Zero tolerance: Policing a free society. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. Farrall, S., Jackson, J., & Gray, E. (2009). Social order and the fear of crime in contemporary times. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Studies in Criminology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferraro, K. F. (1995). Fear of crime: Interpreting victimization risk. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fielding, N., & Innes, M. (2006). Reassurance policing, community policing and measuring police performance. Policing and Society, 16(2), 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flatley, J., Kershaw, C., Smith, K., Chaplin, R., & Moon, D. (2010). Crime in England and Wales 2009/10: Findings from the British Crime Survey and Police Recorded Crime (3rd ed.). Home Office Statistical Bulletin. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  21. Gershuny, J., & Sullivan, O. (1998). The sociological uses of time-use diary analysis. European Sociological Review, 14(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gill, M., & Spriggs, A. (2005). Assessing the impact of CCTV (Rep. No. 292). London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  23. Girling, E., Loader, I., & Sparks, R. (2000). Crime and social order in Middle England: Questions of order in an English town. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hale, C. (1996). Fear of crime: A review of the literature. International Review of Victimology, 4(2), 79–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harcourt, B. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Herbert, S. (2005). Citizens, cops and power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hipp, J. R. (2007). Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: Neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 659–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Home Office. (2005). Neighbourhood policing: Your police, your community, Our commitment. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  29. Hough, M., & Tilley, N. (1998). Auditing crime and disorder: Guidance for local partnerships. Crime detection and prevention series: Paper 91. London: Home Office Police Research Group.Google Scholar
  30. Hughes, G., & Rowe, M. (2007). Neighbourhood policing and community safety: Researching the instabilities of the local governance of crime, disorder and security in contemporary UK. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(4), 317–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Innes, M. (2004). Signal crimes and signal disorders: Notes on deviance as communicative action. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(3), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Innes, M., & Roberts, C. (2008). Reassurance policing, community intelligence and the co-production of neighbourhood order. In T. Williamson (Ed.), The handbook of knowledge based policing. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Innes, M., Hayden, S., Lowe, T., Mackenzie, H., Roberts, C., & Twyman, L. (2004). Signal crimes and reassurance policing volumes 1 and 2. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  34. Innes, M., Hayden, S., Lowe, T., & Roberts, C. (2005). Signal crimes and reassurance policing volume 3. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  35. Jackson, J. (2004). Experience and expression: Social and cultural significance in the fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 44(6), 946–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, E. A., & Hohl, K. (2012). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Johnston, C., & Mooney, G. (2007). ‘Problem’ people, ‘problem’ places? New labour and council estates. In R. Atkinson & G. Helms (Eds.), Securing an urban rennaisance: Crime, community and British urban policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  38. Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322(5908), 1681–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2011). The reversal effect of prohibition signs. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 681–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kling, J. B., Liebman, J. B., Katz, L. F., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2004). Moving to opportunity and tranquillity: Neighbourhood effects on adult economic self-sufficiency and health from a randomized housing voucher experiment Princeton. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  41. Krannich, R. S., Helen Berry, E., & Greider, T. (1989). Fear of crime in rapidly changing rural communities: A longitudinal analysis. Rural Sociology, 54(2), 195–212.Google Scholar
  42. Krivo, L. J., Peterson, R. D., & Kuhl, D. C. (2009). Seggregation, racial structure, and neigborhood violent crime. The American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1765–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Laycock, G., & Tilley, N. (1995). Policing and neighbourhood watch: Strategic issues. Police research group. Crime detection and prevention series: Paper 60. London: Home Office Police Department.Google Scholar
  44. Lupton, R. (2003). Neighbourhood effects: Can we measure them and does it matter? (Rep. No. 73). London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  45. MacDonald, J. M., Hipp, J. R., & Gill, C. (2012). The effects of immigrant concentration on changes in neighborhood crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. Online first, 2 June 2012.Google Scholar
  46. Manley, D., Flowerdew, R., & Steel, D. (2006). Scales, levels and processes: Studying spatial patterns of British census variables. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30(2), 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mason, M. (2009). Findings from the second year of the neighbourhood policing programme evaluation (Home Office Research Report 14). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  48. Mayer, S. E., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighbourhoods: How much does it matter? Science, 243(4897), 1441–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Merry, S. E. (1981a). Urban danger: Life in a neighbourhood of strangers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Merry, S. E. (1981b). Defensible space undefended: Social factors in crime control through environmental design. Urban Affairs Review, 16(4), 397–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Millie, A. (2007). Tackling anti-social behaviour and regenerating neighbourhoods. In R. Atkinson & G. Helms (Eds.), Securing an urban rennaisance: Crime, community and British urban policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  52. Millie, A. (2010). Whatever happened to reassurance policing? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 225–232.Google Scholar
  53. Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morris, J. (2006). The national reassurance policing programme: A ten site evaluation. London: Home Office. Findings 273.Google Scholar
  55. Neighbourhood Renewal Unit. (2004). Neighbourhood warden scheme evaluation (Research Report 8). Wetherby: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  56. Newman, O. (1978). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  57. Newman, O., & Franck, K. A. (1982). The effects of building size on personal crime and fear of crime. Population and Environment, 5(4), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oakes, J. M. (2004). The (Mis)estimation of neighbourhood effects: Causal inference for practicable social epidemiology. Social Science & Medicine, 58(10), 1929–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oberwittler, D., & Wikström, P. O. H. (2009). Why small is better. Advancing the study of the role of behavioural contexts in crime causation. In D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, & G. Bruinsma (Eds.), Utting crime in its place: Units of analysis in spatial crime research (pp. 35–59). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Park, R., & Burgess, E. (1924). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Parkinson, M., Champion, T., Turok, I., Crookston, M., Davies, L., Katz, Y. B., Park, A., Berube, A., Coombes, M., Dorling, D., Evans, R., Glass, N., Hutchins, M., Kearns, A., Martin, R., & Wood, P. (2006). State of English Cities: A research study (Vol. 1). London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
  62. Paskell, C. (2007). Community police relations: Support officers in low-income neighbourhoods. In R. Atkinson & G. Helms (Eds.), Securing an urban rennaisance: Crime, community and British urban policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  63. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone – The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  64. Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Quinton, P., & Tuffin, R. (2007). Neighbourhood change: The impact of the national reassurance policing programme. Policing, 1(2), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (1999). ‘Ecometrics’: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology, 29(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rock, P. (2007). Sociological theories of crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The oxford handbook of criminology (4th ed., pp. 3–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American City: Chicago and the enduring neighbourhood effect. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganisation theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. The American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 603–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighbourhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 633–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 443–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schweitzer, J. H., Woo Kim, J., & Mackin, J. R. (1999). The impact of the built environment on crime and fear of crime in urban neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Technology, 6(3), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scribbins, M., Flatley, M., Parfrement-Hopkins, J., & Hall, P. (2011). Public perceptions of policing, engagement with the police and victimisation: Findings from the 2009/10 British crime survey. Home Office Statistical Bulletin, 19/10, 1–61.Google Scholar
  76. Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  77. Singer, L. (2004). Reassurance policing: An evaluation of the local management of community safety (Home Office Research Study, 288). London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  78. Skogan, W. (1986). Fear of crime and neighbourhood change. In A. S. Reiss Jr & M. Tonry (Eds.), Communities and crime (pp. 203–229). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  79. Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  80. Skogan, W. (2003). Community policing: Can it work? Oxford: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
  81. Skogan, W., & Maxfield, M. G. (1981). Coping with crime: Individual and neighborhood reactions. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Smith, M., & Tilley, N. (Eds.). (2005). Crime science: New approaches to preventing and detecting crime. London: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. Taylor, R. B. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighbourhoods and the Nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  84. Taylor, R. B., & Covington, J. (1993). Community structural change and fear of crime. Social Problems, 40(3), 374–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1984). Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21(4), 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thrasher, F. (1927). The gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  87. van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2012). In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. van Ham, M., Manley, D., Bailey, N., Simpson, L., & Maclennan, D. (2013). Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: New insights for neighbourhood effects research. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Understanding neighbourhood dynamics: New insights for neighbourhood effects research (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  89. Vrij, A., & Winkel, F. W. (1991). Characteristics of the built environment and fear of crime: A research note on interventions in unsafe locations. Deviant Behaviour, 12(2), 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weisburd, D., Bruinsma, G., & Bernasco, W. (2009). Units of analysis in geographic criminology: Historical development, critical issues, and open questions. In D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, & G. Bruinsma (Eds.), Putting crime in its place: Units of analysis in spatial crime research (pp. 35–59). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wikström, P.-O. H. (1991). Urban crime, criminals and victims. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wikström, P.-O. H. (2002). Adolescent crime in context (Report to the Home Office). Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  93. Wikström, P.-O. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In B. G. Lahey, T. E. Moffitt, & A. Caspi (Eds.), Causes of conduct disorder and juvenile delinquency. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  94. Wikström, P.-O. H., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2011). Examining the role of the environment in crime causation: small area community surveys and space-time budgets. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt, & S. F. Messner (Eds.), The sage handbook of criminological research methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  95. Wilcox-Rountree, P., & Land, K. C. (2000). The generalizability of multilevel models of burglary victimization: a cross-city comparison. Social Science Research, 29(2), 284–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38.Google Scholar
  97. Woldoff, R. A. (2006). Emphasizing fear of crime in models of neighbourhood social disorganisation. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 8, 228–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science and Business Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Brunton-Smith
    • 1
  • Alex Sutherland
    • 2
  • Jonathan Jackson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of SurreyGuildford, SurreyUK
  2. 2.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Department of MethodologyThe London School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations