Advertisement

How The Technological Society Became More Important in the United States than in France

  • Carl Mitcham
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 13)

Abstract

La Technique ou L’enjeu du siècle has an unusual history. The original French was published in 1954 and made scarcely a ripple in a cultural world dominated by Jean-Paul Sartre (L’être et le néant, 1943; Saint Genet, comédien et martyr, 1952; Question de méthode, 1957) and Albert Camus (La peste, 1947; La chute, 1956). Although La Technique received ten reviews, most were in periodicals associated with French Protestant intellectual life; only one appeared outside France, in Germany. Somewhat surprisingly, the following decades witnessed translations into Spanish (1960), English (1964), Portuguese (1968), Italian (1969), and Japanese (1975). But most publishing houses were second tier and all non-English translations received little notice.

Keywords

Technological Society Democratic Institution Cultural Criticism Frankfurt School Center Diary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments 

For access to the correspondence between Rustum Roy and Jacques Ellul, I want to acknowledge Della Roy, Kathy Mourant, and Darryl Farber at Pennsylvania State University. Farber deserves further recognition and thanks for numerous conversations about the issues discussed in this article. Some issues were also discussed with Rustum Roy himself before his death in 2010. All translations from Ellul’s French are my own.

References

  1. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1998. Globalization: The human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beichman, Arnold. 1964. Is technique running us? Christian Science Monitor 24 September: 7.Google Scholar
  3. Bijker, Wiebe E., and John Law (eds.). 1992. Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Buchanan, Scott. 1965. Untitled review. George Washington Law Review 33(3): 821–823.Google Scholar
  5. Carson, Rachel. 1962. Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  6. Chase, Stuart. 1929. Men and machines. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Donnelly, Thomas G. 1973. In defense of technology. Christian Century 90(3): 65–69.Google Scholar
  8. Dusek, Val. 2006. Philosophy of technology: An introduction. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Ellul, Jacques. 1954. La Technique ou l’enjeu du siècle. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  10. Ellul, Jacques. 1960. El siglo XX y la técnica [Spanish translation of La Technique]. Madrid: Labor.Google Scholar
  11. Ellul, Jacques. 1963. The technological order. In The technological order, ed. Carl Stover, 10–37. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ellul, Jacques. 1964. The technological society [English translation of La Technique]. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  13. Ellul, Jacques, and Robert Theobald. 1965. The technological society: A dialogue. Nation 200: 567–569Google Scholar
  14. Ellul, Jacques. 1968. A técnica e o desafio do século [Portuguese translation of La Technique]. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
  15. Ellul, Jacques. 1969. La tecnica, rischio del secolo [Italian translation of La Technique]. Milan: Giuffré.Google Scholar
  16. Ellul, Jacques. 1975. Gijutsu shakai [Japanese translation of La Technique]. Tokyo: Sugu Shobô.Google Scholar
  17. Ellul, Jacques. 1981. À temps et à contretemps. Paris: Centurion.Google Scholar
  18. Ellul, Jacques. 1990a. La Technique ou l’enjeu du siècle. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  19. Ellul, Jacques. 1990b. The technological bluff. Trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  20. Ferkiss, Victor C. 1969. Technological man: The myth and the reality. New York: Braziller.Google Scholar
  21. Ferré, Frederick. 1988. Philosophy of technology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Florman, Samuel C. 1972. Anti-technology: The new myth. Civil Engineering 42: 68–70.Google Scholar
  23. Fruchtbaum, Harold. 1964. Untitled review. Library Jourrnal 89: 3175–3176.Google Scholar
  24. Giedion, Siegfried. 1948. Mechanization takes command: A contribution to anonymous history. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gopnik, Adam. 2012. Inquiring minds: The Spanish Inquisition revisited. New Yorker 16 January: 70–75.Google Scholar
  26. Goulet, Denis. 1971. The cruel choice: A new concept in the theory of development. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of Development and Social Change.Google Scholar
  27. Halberstam, David. 1993. The fifties. New York: Villard.Google Scholar
  28. Hanks, Joyce Main. 2007. The reception of Jacques Ellul’s critique of technology: An annotated bibliography of writings on his life and thought (books, articles, reviews, symposia). Lewiston: Edwin Mellon Press.Google Scholar
  29. Heidegger, Martin. 1954. Die frage nach der technik. In Vorträge und Aufsätze, 13–44. Pfullingen: Neske.Google Scholar
  30. Holloway, James Y. (ed.). 1970. Introducing Jacques Ellul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  31. Ihde, Don. 1993. Philosophy of technology: An introduction. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  32. Jaspers, Karl. 1932 [1955]. Die geistige Situation der Zeit, 5th ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  33. Kanigel, Robert. 1997. The one best way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the enigma of efficiency. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  34. Kelly, Frank K. 1981. Court of reason: Robert Hutchins and the fund for the republic. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. King Jr., Martin Luther. 1958. Stride toward freedom: The Montgomery story. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  36. Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  37. Marwick, Arthur. 1998. The sixties: Cultural revolution in Britain, France, Italy, and the United States, c.1958-c.1974. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mesthene, Emmanuel G. 1970. Technological change: Its impact on man and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mitcham, Carl, and Robert Mackey. 1971. Jacques Ellul and the technological society. Philosophy Today 15(2): 102–121.Google Scholar
  40. Muller, Herbert J. 1970. The children of Frankenstein: A primer on modern technology and human values. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mumford, Lewis. 1934 [1963]. Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt Brace and World.Google Scholar
  42. Nader, Ralph. 1965. Unsafe at any speed: The designed-in dangers of the American automobile. New York: Grossman.Google Scholar
  43. Olsen, Jan Kyrre, Evan Selinger Berg, and Søren Riis (eds.). 2009. New waves in philosophy of technology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Ortega y Gasset, José. 1945–1947 [1939]. Medicación de la técnica. In Obras Completas, vol. 5, 317–375. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.Google Scholar
  45. Pitt, Joseph C. 2000. Thinking about technology: Foundations of the philosophy of technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
  46. Ransom, Harry Howe. 1964. Man and method: Which is master? Saturday Review 47: 48.Google Scholar
  47. Ritzer, George. 1993. The McDonaldization of society: An investigation into the changing character of contemporary social life. Newbury Park: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schatzberg, Eric. 2006. Technik comes to America: Changing meanings of technology before 1930. Technology and Culture 47(3): 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silbermann, Charles. 1966. The myths of automation. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  50. Sklair, Leslie. 1971. The sociology of the opposition to science and technology, with special reference to the work of Jacques Ellul. Comparative Studies in Society and History 13(2): 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spengler, Oswald. 1922. Der Untergang des Abendlandes: Welthistorische Perspektive. Munich: C.H. Becksche.Google Scholar
  52. Stover, Carl F. (ed.). 1963. The technological order: Proceedings of the encyclopedia Britannica conference. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Theobald, Robert. 1964. The house that Homo sapiens built. Nation 199: 249–252.Google Scholar
  54. Walker, Ted. 2011. Reflections on technology. Catholic Worker 78(3): 4–5.Google Scholar
  55. Wheeler, Harvey. 1967. Means, ends, and human institutions. Nation 204: 9–16.Google Scholar
  56. Whyte, William H. 1956. The organization man. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  57. Wilkinson, John. 1964. The quantitative society or, what are you to do with noodle? Santa Barbara: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.Google Scholar
  58. Wilkinson, John. 1970. The divine persuasion: An interview on Jacques Ellul with John Wilkinson. Katallagete 2(3–4): 57–65.Google Scholar
  59. Wilkinson, John, et al. 1966. Technology and human values. Santa Barbara: Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Liberal Arts and International StudiesColorado School of MinesGoldenUSA

Personalised recommendations