Abstract
The Drosophila central nervous system develops from polarised asymmetric divisions of precursor cells, called neuroblasts. Decades of research on neuroblasts have resulted in a substantial understanding of the factors and molecular events responsible for fate decisions of neuroblasts and their progeny. Furthermore, the cell-cycle dependent mechanisms responsible for asymmetric cortical protein localisation, resulting in the unequal partitioning between daughters, are beginning to be exposed. Disruption to the appropriate partitioning of proteins between neuroblasts and differentiation-committed daughters can lead to supernumerary neuroblast-like cells and the formation of tumours. Many of the factors responsible for regulating asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblasts are evolutionarily conserved and, in many cases, have been shown to play a functionally conserved role in mammalian neurogenesis. Recent genome-wide studies coupled with advancements in live-imaging technologies have opened further avenues of research into neuroblast biology. We review our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms regulating neuroblast divisions, a powerful system to model mammalian neurogenesis and tumourigenesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Westphal M, Lamszus K (2011) The neurobiology of gliomas: from cell biology to the development of therapeutic approaches. Nat Rev Neurosci 12(9):495–508
Caussinus E, Gonzalez C (2005) Induction of tumor growth by altered stem-cell asymmetric division in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet 37(10):1125–1129
Januschke J, Gonzalez C (2008) Drosophila asymmetric division, polarity and cancer. Oncogene 27(55):6994–7002
Woodhouse E, Hersperger E, Shearn A (1998) Growth, metastasis, and invasiveness of Drosophila tumors caused by mutations in specific tumor suppressor genes. Dev Genes Evol 207(8):542–550
Campos-Ortega JA (1993) Mechanisms of early neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurobiol 24(10):1305–1327
Egger B, Boone JQ, Stevens NR, Brand AH et al (2007) Regulation of spindle orientation and neural stem cell fate in the Drosophila optic lobe. Neural Dev 2:1
Campos-Ortega JA, Hartenstein V (1997) The embryonic development of Drosophila melanogaster. Springer, Berlin
Bossing T, Udolph G, Doe CQ, Technau GM (1996) The embryonic central nervous system lineages of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Neuroblast lineages derived from the ventral half of the neuroectoderm. Dev Biol 179(1):41–64
Hartenstein V, Rudloff E, Campos-Ortega JA (1987) The pattern of proliferation of the neuroblasts in the wild-type embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. Roux Arch Dev Biol 196:473–485
Datta S (1995) Control of proliferation activation in quiescent neuroblasts of the Drosophila central nervous system. Development 121(4):1173–1182
Prokop A, Technau GM (1991) The origin of postembryonic neuroblasts in the ventral nerve cord of Drosophila melanogaster. Development 111(1):79–88
Truman JW, Bate M (1988) Spatial and temporal patterns of neurogenesis in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 125(1):145–157
Tsuji T, Hasegawa E, Isshiki T (2008) Neuroblast entry into quiescence is regulated intrinsically by the combined action of spatial Hox proteins and temporal identity factors. Development 135(23):3859–3869
Bello BC, Hirth F, Gould AP (2003) A pulse of the Drosophila Hox protein abdominal-A schedules the end of neural proliferation via neuroblast apoptosis. Neuron 37(2):209–219
Maurange C, Cheng L, Gould AP (2008) Temporal transcription factors and their targets schedule the end of neural proliferation in Drosophila. Cell 133(5):891–902
Siegrist SE, Haque NS, Chen CH, Hay BA et al (2010) Inactivation of both Foxo and reaper promotes long-term adult neurogenesis in Drosophila. Curr Biol 20(7):643–648
Britton JS, Edgar BA (1998) Environmental control of the cell cycle in Drosophila: nutrition activates mitotic and endoreplicative cells by distinct mechanisms. Development 125(11):2149–2158
Chell JM, Brand AH (2010) Nutrition-responsive glia control exit of neural stem cells from quiescence. Cell 143(7):1161–1173
Sousa-Nunes R, Yee LL, Gould AP (2011) Fat cells reactivate quiescent neuroblasts via TOR and glial insulin relays in Drosophila. Nature 471(7339):508–512
Salomoni P, Calegari F (2010) Cell cycle control of mammalian neural stem cells: putting a speed limit on G1. Trends Cell Biol 20(5):233–243
Suh J, Jackson FR (2007) Drosophila ebony activity is required in glia for the circadian regulation of locomotor activity. Neuron 55(3):435–447
Kitajima A, Fuse N, Isshiki T, Matsuzaki F (2010) Progenitor properties of symmetrically dividing Drosophila neuroblasts during embryonic and larval development. Dev Biol 347(1):9–23
Rebollo E, Roldan M, Gonzalez C (2009) Spindle alignment is achieved without rotation after the first cell cycle in Drosophila embryonic neuroblasts. Development 136(20):3393–3397
Berger C, Urban J, Technau GM (2001) Stage-specific inductive signals in the Drosophila neuroectoderm control the temporal sequence of neuroblast specification. Development 128(17):3243–3251
Urbach R, Schnabel R, Technau GM (2003) The pattern of neuroblast formation, mitotic domains and proneural gene expression during early brain development in Drosophila. Development 130(16):3589–3606
Lee CY, Robinson KJ, Doe CQ (2006) Lgl, Pins and aPKC regulate neuroblast self-renewal versus differentiation. Nature 439(7076):594–598
Urbach R, Technau GM (2004) Neuroblast formation and patterning during early brain development in Drosophila. BioEssays News Rev Mol Cell Dev Biol 26(7):739–751
Benito-Sipos J, Estacio-Gomez A, Moris-Sanz M, Baumgardt M et al (2010) A genetic cascade involving klumpfuss, nab and castor specifies the abdominal leucokinergic neurons in the Drosophila CNS. Development 137(19):3327–3336
Jan YN, Jan LY (1994) Genetic control of cell fate specification in Drosophila peripheral nervous system. Annu Rev Genet 28:373–393
Slack C, Somers WG, Sousa-Nunes R, Chia W et al (2006) A mosaic genetic screen for novel mutations affecting Drosophila neuroblast divisions. BMC Genet 7:33
Bayraktar OA, Boone JQ, Drummond ML, Doe CQ (2010) Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages keep Prospero levels low to generate large clones that contribute to the adult brain central complex. Neural Dev 5:26
Bello BC, Izergina N, Caussinus E, Reichert H (2008) Amplification of neural stem cell proliferation by intermediate progenitor cells in Drosophila brain development. Neural Dev 3:5
Boone JQ, Doe CQ (2008) Identification of Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages containing transit amplifying ganglion mother cells. Dev Neurobiol 68(9):1185–1195
Bowman SK, Rolland V, Betschinger J, Kinsey KA et al (2008) The tumor suppressors Brat and Numb regulate transit-amplifying neuroblast lineages in Drosophila. Dev Cell 14(4):535–546
Izergina N, Balmer J, Bello B, Reichert H (2009) Postembryonic development of transit amplifying neuroblast lineages in the Drosophila brain. Neural Dev 4:44
Viktorin G, Riebli N, Popkova A, Giangrande A et al (2011) Multipotent neural stem cells generate glial cells of the central complex through transit amplifying intermediate progenitors in Drosophila brain development. Dev Biol 356(2):553–565
Xiao Q, Komori H, Lee CY (2012) klumpfuss distinguishes stem cells from progenitor cells during asymmetric neuroblast division. Development 139:2670–2680
Kriegstein A, Noctor S, Martinez-Cerdeno V (2006) Patterns of neural stem and progenitor cell division may underlie evolutionary cortical expansion. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(11):883–890
Morrison SJ, Kimble J (2006) Asymmetric and symmetric stem-cell divisions in development and cancer. Nature 441(7097):1068–1074
Zhu S, Barshow S, Wildonger J, Jan LY et al (2011) Ets transcription factor pointed promotes the generation of intermediate neural progenitors in Drosophila larval brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(51):20615–20620
Carney TD, Miller MR, Robinson KJ, Bayraktar OA et al (2012) Functional genomics identifies neural stem cell sub-type expression profiles and genes regulating neuroblast homeostasis. Dev Biol 361(1):137–146
Brody T, Odenwald WF (2000) Programmed transformations in neuroblast gene expression during Drosophila CNS lineage development. Dev Biol 226(1):34–44
Grosskortenhaus R, Pearson BJ, Marusich A, Doe CQ (2005) Regulation of temporal identity transitions in Drosophila neuroblasts. Dev Cell 8(2):193–202
Isshiki T, Pearson B, Holbrook S, Doe CQ (2001) Drosophila neuroblasts sequentially express transcription factors which specify the temporal identity of their neuronal progeny. Cell 106(4):511–521
Kambadur R, Koizumi K, Stivers C, Nagle J et al (1998) Regulation of POU genes by castor and hunchback establishes layered compartments in the Drosophila CNS. Genes Dev 12(2):246–260
Pearson BJ, Doe CQ (2003) Regulation of neuroblast competence in Drosophila. Nature 425(6958):624–628
Furst A, Mahowald AP (1985) Cell division cycle of cultured neural precursor cells from Drosophila. Dev Biol 112(2):467–476
Kao CF, Yu HH, He Y, Kao JC et al (2012) Hierarchical deployment of factors regulating temporal fate in a diverse neuronal lineage of the Drosophila central brain. Neuron 73(4):677–684
Zigman M, Cayouette M, Charalambous C, Schleiffer A et al (2005) Mammalian inscuteable regulates spindle orientation and cell fate in the developing retina. Neuron 48(4):539–545
Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA, Knoblich JA (2012) Spindle orientation in mammalian cerebral cortical development. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:737–746
Postiglione MP, Juschke C, Xie Y, Haas GA et al (2011) Mouse inscuteable induces apical-basal spindle orientation to facilitate intermediate progenitor generation in the developing neocortex. Neuron 72(2):269–284
Poulson ND, Lechler T (2010) Robust control of mitotic spindle orientation in the developing epidermis. J Cell Biol 191(5):915–922
Izaki T, Kamakura S, Kohjima M, Sumimoto H (2006) Two forms of human Inscuteable-related protein that links Par3 to the Pins homologues LGN and AGS3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 341(4):1001–1006
Bultje RS, Castaneda-Castellanos DR, Jan LY, Jan YN et al (2009) Mammalian Par3 regulates progenitor cell asymmetric division via notch signaling in the developing neocortex. Neuron 63(2):189–202
Chen X, Macara IG (2005) Par-3 controls tight junction assembly through the Rac exchange factor Tiam1. Nat Cell Biol 7(3):262–269
Hirose T, Izumi Y, Nagashima Y, Tamai-Nagai Y et al (2002) Involvement of ASIP/PAR-3 in the promotion of epithelial tight junction formation. J Cell Sci 115(Pt 12):2485–2495
Izumi Y, Hirose T, Tamai Y, Hirai S et al (1998) An atypical PKC directly associates and colocalizes at the epithelial tight junction with ASIP, a mammalian homologue of Caenorhabditis elegans polarity protein PAR-3. J Cell Biol 143(1):95–106
Joberty G, Petersen C, Gao L, Macara IG (2000) The cell-polarity protein Par6 links Par3 and atypical protein kinase C to Cdc42. Nat Cell Biol 2(8):531–539
Lin D, Edwards AS, Fawcett JP, Mbamalu G et al (2000) A mammalian PAR-3-PAR-6 complex implicated in Cdc42/Rac1 and aPKC signalling and cell polarity. Nat Cell Biol 2(8):540–547
Durgan J, Kaji N, Jin D, Hall A (2011) Par6B and atypical PKC regulate mitotic spindle orientation during epithelial morphogenesis. J Biol Chem 286(14):12461–12474
Hao Y, Du Q, Chen X, Zheng Z et al (2010) Par3 controls epithelial spindle orientation by aPKC-mediated phosphorylation of apical Pins. Curr Biol 20(20):1809–1818
Suzuki A, Ishiyama C, Hashiba K, Shimizu M et al (2002) aPKC kinase activity is required for the asymmetric differentiation of the premature junctional complex during epithelial cell polarization. J Cell Sci 115(Pt 18):3565–3573
Plant PJ, Fawcett JP, Lin DC, Holdorf AD et al (2003) A polarity complex of mPar-6 and atypical PKC binds, phosphorylates and regulates mammalian Lgl. Nat Cell Biol 5(4):301–308
Nishimura T, Kato K, Yamaguchi T, Fukata Y et al (2004) Role of the PAR-3-KIF3 complex in the establishment of neuronal polarity. Nat Cell Biol 6(4):328–334
Shi SH, Cheng T, Jan LY, Jan YN (2004) APC and GSK-3beta are involved in mPar3 targeting to the nascent axon and establishment of neuronal polarity. Curr Biol 14(22):2025–2032
Shi SH, Jan LY, Jan YN (2003) Hippocampal neuronal polarity specified by spatially localized mPar3/mPar6 and PI 3-kinase activity. Cell 112(1):63–75
Etienne-Manneville S, Hall A (2003) Cell polarity: Par6, aPKC and cytoskeletal crosstalk. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15(1):67–72
Lechler T, Fuchs E (2005) Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin. Nature 437(7056):275–280
Guo X, Gao S (2009) Pins homolog LGN regulates meiotic spindle organization in mouse oocytes. Cell Res 19(7):838–848
Williams SE, Beronja S, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E (2011) Asymmetric cell divisions promote Notch-dependent epidermal differentiation. Nature 470(7334):353–358
Konno D, Shioi G, Shitamukai A, Mori A et al (2008) Neuroepithelial progenitors undergo LGN-dependent planar divisions to maintain self-renewability during mammalian neurogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 10(1):93–101
Du Q, Stukenberg PT, Macara IG (2001) A mammalian Partner of inscuteable binds NuMA and regulates mitotic spindle organization. Nat Cell Biol 3(12):1069–1075
Zhu J, Wen W, Zheng Z, Shang Y et al (2011) LGN/mInsc and LGN/NuMA complex structures suggest distinct functions in asymmetric cell division for the Par3/mInsc/LGN and Galphai/LGN/NuMA pathways. Mol Cell 43(3):418–431
Du Q, Macara IG (2004) Mammalian Pins is a conformational switch that links NuMA to heterotrimeric G proteins. Cell 119(4):503–516
Sanada K, Tsai LH (2005) G protein betagamma subunits and AGS3 control spindle orientation and asymmetric cell fate of cerebral cortical progenitors. Cell 122(1):119–131
Zeng C (2000) NuMA: a nuclear protein involved in mitotic centrosome function. Microsc Res Tech 49(5):467–477
Yamamoto T, Harada N, Kano K, Taya S et al (1997) The Ras target AF-6 interacts with ZO-1 and serves as a peripheral component of tight junctions in epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 139(3):785–795
Zhadanov AB, Provance DW Jr, Speer CA, Coffin JD et al (1999) Absence of the tight junctional protein AF-6 disrupts epithelial cell-cell junctions and cell polarity during mouse development. Curr Biol 9(16):880–888
Manneville JB, Jehanno M, Etienne-Manneville S (2010) Dlg1 binds GKAP to control dynein association with microtubules, centrosome positioning, and cell polarity. J Cell Biol 191(3):585–598
Martin-McCaffrey L, Willard FS, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, Natale DR et al (2004) RGS14 is a mitotic spindle protein essential from the first division of the mammalian zygote. Dev Cell 7(5):763–769
Dyer MA, Livesey FJ, Cepko CL, Oliver G (2003) Prox1 function controls progenitor cell proliferation and horizontal cell genesis in the mammalian retina. Nat Genet 34(1):53–58
Hope KJ, Cellot S, Ting SB, MacRae T et al (2010) An RNAi screen identifies Msi2 and Prox1 as having opposite roles in the regulation of hematopoietic stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell 7(1):101–113
Shin JW, Min M, Larrieu-Lahargue F, Canron X et al (2006) Prox1 promotes lineage-specific expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor-3 in lymphatic endothelium: a role for FGF signaling in lymphangiogenesis. Mol Biol Cell 17(2):576–584
Kiebler MA, Hemraj I, Verkade P, Kohrmann M et al (1999) The mammalian staufen protein localizes to the somatodendritic domain of cultured hippocampal neurons: implications for its involvement in mRNA transport. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 19(1):288–297
Tang SJ, Meulemans D, Vazquez L, Colaco N et al (2001) A role for a rat homolog of staufen in the transport of RNA to neuronal dendrites. Neuron 32(3):463–475
Schwamborn JC, Berezikov E, Knoblich JA (2009) The TRIM-NHL protein TRIM32 activates microRNAs and prevents self-renewal in mouse neural progenitors. Cell 136(5):913–925
Zhong W, Feder JN, Jiang MM, Jan LY et al (1996) Asymmetric localization of a mammalian numb homolog during mouse cortical neurogenesis. Neuron 17(1):43–53
Smith CA, Lau KM, Rahmani Z, Dho SE et al (2007) aPKC-mediated phosphorylation regulates asymmetric membrane localization of the cell fate determinant Numb. EMBO J 26(2):468–480
Petersen PH, Zou K, Hwang JK, Jan YN et al (2002) Progenitor cell maintenance requires numb and numblike during mouse neurogenesis. Nature 419(6910):929–934
Petersen PH, Zou K, Krauss S, Zhong W (2004) Continuing role for mouse Numb and Numbl in maintaining progenitor cells during cortical neurogenesis. Nat Neurosci 7(8):803–811
Broadus J, Doe CQ (1997) Extrinsic cues, intrinsic cues and microfilaments regulate asymmetric protein localization in Drosophila neuroblasts. Curr Biol 7(11):827–835
Lu B, Roegiers F, Jan LY, Jan YN (2001) Adherens junctions inhibit asymmetric division in the Drosophila epithelium. Nature 409(6819):522–525
Bachmann A, Schneider M, Theilenberg E, Grawe F et al (2001) Drosophila Stardust is a partner of Crumbs in the control of epithelial cell polarity. Nature 414(6864):638–643
Hong Y, Stronach B, Perrimon N, Jan LY et al (2001) Drosophila Stardust interacts with Crumbs to control polarity of epithelia but not neuroblasts. Nature 414(6864):634–638
Kuchinke U, Grawe F, Knust E (1998) Control of spindle orientation in Drosophila by the Par-3-related PDZ-domain protein Bazooka. Curr Biol 8(25):1357–1365
Petronczki M, Knoblich JA (2001) DmPAR-6 directs epithelial polarity and asymmetric cell division of neuroblasts in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol 3(1):43–49
Tepass U, Theres C, Knust E (1990) Crumbs encodes an EGF-like protein expressed on apical membranes of Drosophila epithelial cells and required for organization of epithelia. Cell 61(5):787–799
Wodarz A, Ramrath A, Grimm A, Knust E (2000) Drosophila atypical protein kinase C associates with Bazooka and controls polarity of epithelia and neuroblasts. J Cell Biol 150(6):1361–1374
Li P, Yang X, Wasser M, Cai Y et al (1997) Inscuteable and Staufen mediate asymmetric localization and segregation of prospero RNA during Drosophila neuroblast cell divisions. Cell 90(3):437–447
Schober M, Schaefer M, Knoblich JA (1999) Bazooka recruits Inscuteable to orient asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nature 402(6761):548–551
Wodarz A, Ramrath A, Kuchinke U, Knust E (1999) Bazooka provides an apical cue for inscuteable localization in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nature 402(6761):544–547
Yu F, Kuo CT, Jan YN (2006) Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric cell division: recent advances and implications for stem cell biology. Neuron 51(1):13–20
Kraut R, Chia W, Jan LY, Jan YN et al (1996) Role of inscuteable in orienting asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila. Nature 383(6595):50–55
Knoblich JA, Jan LY, Jan YN (1999) Deletion analysis of the Drosophila Inscuteable protein reveals domains for cortical localization and asymmetric localization. Curr Biol 9(3):155–158
Tio M, Udolph G, Yang X, Chia W (2001) cdc2 links the Drosophila cell cycle and asymmetric division machineries. Nature 409(6823):1063–1067
Siegrist SE, Doe CQ (2005) Microtubule-induced Pins/Galphai cortical polarity in Drosophila neuroblasts. Cell 123(7):1323–1335
Schaefer M, Shevchenko A, Knoblich JA (2000) A protein complex containing Inscuteable and the Galpha-binding protein Pins orients asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila. Curr Biol 10(7):353–362
Yu F, Ong CT, Chia W, Yang X (2002) Membrane targeting and asymmetric localization of Drosophila partner of inscuteable are discrete steps controlled by distinct regions of the protein. Mol Cell Biol 22(12):4230–4240
Willard FS, Kimple RJ, Siderovski DP (2004) Return of the GDI: the GoLoco motif in cell division. Annu Rev Biochem 73:925–951
Yu F, Wang H, Qian H, Kaushik R et al (2005) Locomotion defects, together with Pins, regulates heterotrimeric G-protein signaling during Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions. Genes Dev 19(11):1341–1353
Schaefer M, Petronczki M, Dorner D, Forte M et al (2001) Heterotrimeric G proteins direct two modes of asymmetric cell division in the Drosophila nervous system. Cell 107(2):183–194
Yu F, Cai Y, Kaushik R, Yang X et al (2003) Distinct roles of Galphai and Gbeta13F subunits of the heterotrimeric G protein complex in the mediation of Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions. J Cell Biol 162(4):623–633
Hampoelz B, Hoeller O, Bowman SK, Dunican D et al (2005) Drosophila Ric-8 is essential for plasma-membrane localization of heterotrimeric G proteins. Nat Cell Biol 7(11):1099–1105
Wang H, Ng KH, Qian H, Siderovski DP et al (2005) Ric-8 controls Drosophila neural progenitor asymmetric division by regulating heterotrimeric G proteins. Nat Cell Biol 7(11):1091–1098
Betschinger J, Mechtler K, Knoblich JA (2006) Asymmetric segregation of the tumor suppressor brat regulates self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells. Cell 124(6):1241–1253
Fuerstenberg S, Peng CY, Alvarez-Ortiz P, Hor T et al (1998) Identification of Miranda protein domains regulating asymmetric cortical localization, cargo binding, and cortical release. Mol Cell Neurosci 12(6):325–339
Ikeshima-Kataoka H, Skeath JB, Nabeshima Y, Doe CQ et al (1997) Miranda directs Prospero to a daughter cell during Drosophila asymmetric divisions. Nature 390(6660):625–629
Lee CY, Wilkinson BD, Siegrist SE, Wharton RP et al (2006) Brat is a Miranda cargo protein that promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits neuroblast self-renewal. Dev Cell 10(4):441–449
Matsuzaki F, Ohshiro T, Ikeshima-Kataoka H, Izumi H (1998) Miranda localizes staufen and prospero asymmetrically in mitotic neuroblasts and epithelial cells in early Drosophila embryogenesis. Development 125(20):4089–4098
Schuldt AJ, Adams JH, Davidson CM, Micklem DR et al (1998) Miranda mediates asymmetric protein and RNA localization in the developing nervous system. Genes Dev 12(12):1847–1857
Shen CP, Jan LY, Jan YN (1997) Miranda is required for the asymmetric localization of Prospero during mitosis in Drosophila. Cell 90(3):449–458
Shen CP, Knoblich JA, Chan YM, Jiang MM et al (1998) Miranda as a multidomain adapter linking apically localized Inscuteable and basally localized Staufen and Prospero during asymmetric cell division in Drosophila. Genes Dev 12(12):1837–1846
Broadus J, Fuerstenberg S, Doe CQ (1998) Staufen-dependent localization of prospero mRNA contributes to neuroblast daughter-cell fate. Nature 391(6669):792–795
Erben V, Waldhuber M, Langer D, Fetka I et al (2008) Asymmetric localization of the adaptor protein Miranda in neuroblasts is achieved by diffusion and sequential interaction of myosin II and VI. J Cell Sci 121(Pt 9):1403–1414
Hirata J, Nakagoshi H, Nabeshima Y, Matsuzaki F (1995) Asymmetric segregation of the homeodomain protein Prospero during Drosophila development. Nature 377(6550):627–630
Knoblich JA, Jan LY, Jan YN (1995) Asymmetric segregation of Numb and Prospero during cell division. Nature 377(6550):624–627
Spana EP, Doe CQ (1995) The prospero transcription factor is asymmetrically localized to the cell cortex during neuroblast mitosis in Drosophila. Development 121(10):3187–3195
Choksi SP, Southall TD, Bossing T, Edoff K et al (2006) Prospero acts as a binary switch between self-renewal and differentiation in Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev Cell 11(6):775–789
Li L, Vaessin H (2000) Pan-neural Prospero terminates cell proliferation during Drosophila neurogenesis. Genes Dev 14(2):147–151
Southall TD, Brand AH (2009) Neural stem cell transcriptional networks highlight genes essential for nervous system development. EMBO J 28(24):3799–3807
Cabernard C, Doe CQ (2009) Apical/basal spindle orientation is required for neuroblast homeostasis and neuronal differentiation in Drosophila. Dev Cell 17(1):134–141
Sousa-Nunes R, Chia W, Somers WG (2009) Protein phosphatase 4 mediates localization of the Miranda complex during Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions. Genes Dev 23(3):359–372
Bello B, Reichert H, Hirth F (2006) The brain tumor gene negatively regulates neural progenitor cell proliferation in the larval central brain of Drosophila. Development 133(14):2639–2648
Weng M, Golden KL, Lee CY (2010) dFezf/Earmuff maintains the restricted developmental potential of intermediate neural progenitors in Drosophila. Dev Cell 18(1):126–135
Vecchione A, Croce CM, Baldassarre G (2007) Fez1/Lzts1 a new mitotic regulator implicated in cancer development. Cell Div 2:24
Karalay O, Doberauer K, Vadodaria KC, Knobloch M et al (2011) Prospero-related homeobox 1 gene (Prox1) is regulated by canonical Wnt signaling and has a stage-specific role in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(14):5807–5812
Lavado A, Lagutin OV, Chow LM, Baker SJ et al (2010) Prox1 is required for granule cell maturation and intermediate progenitor maintenance during brain neurogenesis. PLoS Biol 8(8)
Torii M, Matsuzaki F, Osumi N, Kaibuchi K et al (1999) Transcription factors Mash-1 and Prox-1 delineate early steps in differentiation of neural stem cells in the developing central nervous system. Development 126(3):443–456
Elsir T, Eriksson A, Orrego A, Lindstrom MS et al (2010) Expression of PROX1 Is a common feature of high-grade malignant astrocytic gliomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 69(2):129–138
Laerm A, Helmbold P, Goldberg M, Dammann R et al (2007) Prospero-related homeobox 1 (PROX1) is frequently inactivated by genomic deletions and epigenetic silencing in carcinomas of the bilary system. J Hepatol 46(1):89–97
Miettinen M, Wang ZF (2012) Prox1 transcription factor as a marker for vascular tumors-evaluation of 314 vascular endothelial and 1086 nonvascular tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 36(3):351–359
Petrova TV, Nykanen A, Norrmen C, Ivanov KI et al (2008) Transcription factor PROX1 induces colon cancer progression by promoting the transition from benign to highly dysplastic phenotype. Cancer Cell 13(5):407–419
Shimoda M, Takahashi M, Yoshimoto T, Kono T et al (2006) A homeobox protein, prox1, is involved in the differentiation, proliferation, and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 12(20 Pt 1):6005–6011
Skog M, Bono P, Lundin M, Lundin J et al (2011) Expression and prognostic value of transcription factor PROX1 in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 105(9):1346–1351
Versmold B, Felsberg J, Mikeska T, Ehrentraut D et al (2007) Epigenetic silencing of the candidate tumor suppressor gene PROX1 in sporadic breast cancer. Int J Cancer 121(3):547–554
Elsir T, Qu M, Berntsson SG, Orrego A et al (2011) PROX1 is a predictor of survival for gliomas WHO grade II. Br J Cancer 104(11):1747–1754
Griffiths RL, Hidalgo A (2004) Prospero maintains the mitotic potential of glial precursors enabling them to respond to neurons. EMBO J 23(12):2440–2450
Lee CY, Andersen RO, Cabernard C, Manning L et al (2006) Drosophila Aurora-A kinase inhibits neuroblast self-renewal by regulating aPKC/Numb cortical polarity and spindle orientation. Genes Dev 20(24):3464–3474
Wang H, Somers GW, Bashirullah A, Heberlein U et al (2006) Aurora-A acts as a tumor suppressor and regulates self-renewal of Drosophila neuroblasts. Genes Dev 20(24):3453–3463
Knoblich JA, Jan LY, Jan YN (1997) The N terminus of the Drosophila Numb protein directs membrane association and actin-dependent asymmetric localization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(24):13005–13010
Zilian O, Saner C, Hagedorn L, Lee HY et al (2001) Multiple roles of mouse Numb in tuning developmental cell fates. Curr Biol 11(7):494–501
Chang KC, Garcia-Alvarez G, Somers G, Sousa-Nunes R et al (2010) Interplay between the transcription factor Zif and aPKC regulates neuroblast polarity and self-renewal. Dev Cell 19(5):778–785
Chabu C, Doe CQ (2008) Dap160/intersectin binds and activates aPKC to regulate cell polarity and cell cycle progression. Development 135(16):2739–2746
Wirtz-Peitz F, Nishimura T, Knoblich JA (2008) Linking cell cycle to asymmetric division: Aurora-A phosphorylates the Par complex to regulate Numb localization. Cell 135(1):161–173
Betschinger J, Eisenhaber F, Knoblich JA (2005) Phosphorylation-induced autoinhibition regulates the cytoskeletal protein Lethal (2) giant larvae. Curr Biol 15(3):276–282
Atwood SX, Prehoda KE (2009) aPKC phosphorylates Miranda to polarize fate determinants during neuroblast asymmetric cell division. Curr Biol 19(9):723–729
Sousa-Nunes R, Somers WG (2010) Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events allow for rapid segregation of fate determinants during Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions. Commun Integr Biol 3(1):46–49
Berger C, Kannan R, Myneni S, Renner S et al (2010) Cell cycle independent role of cyclin E during neural cell fate specification in Drosophila is mediated by its regulation of Prospero function. Dev Biol 337(2):415–424
Slack C, Overton PM, Tuxworth RI, Chia W (2007) Asymmetric localisation of Miranda and its cargo proteins during neuroblast division requires the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Development 134(21):3781–3787
Ouyang Y, Petritsch C, Wen H, Jan L et al (2011) Dronc caspase exerts a non-apoptotic function to restrain phospho-Numb-induced ectopic neuroblast formation in Drosophila. Development 138(11):2185–2196
Wang H, Ouyang Y, Somers WG, Chia W et al (2007) Polo inhibits progenitor self-renewal and regulates Numb asymmetry by phosphorylating Pon. Nature 449(7158):96–100
Ogawa H, Ohta N, Moon W, Matsuzaki F (2009) Protein phosphatase 2A negatively regulates aPKC signaling by modulating phosphorylation of Par-6 in Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions. J Cell Sci 122(Pt 18):3242–3249
Chabu C, Doe CQ (2009) Twins/PP2A regulates aPKC to control neuroblast cell polarity and self-renewal. Dev Biol 330(2):399–405
Krahn MP, Egger-Adam D, Wodarz A (2009) PP2A antagonizes phosphorylation of Bazooka by PAR-1 to control apical-basal polarity in dividing embryonic neuroblasts. Dev Cell 16(6):901–908
Peng CY, Manning L, Albertson R, Doe CQ (2000) The tumour-suppressor genes lgl and dlg regulate basal protein targeting in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nature 408(6812):596–600
Cai Y, Chia W, Yang X (2001) A family of snail-related zinc finger proteins regulates two distinct and parallel mechanisms that mediate Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric divisions. EMBO J 20(7):1704–1714
Wang H, Cai Y, Chia W, Yang X (2006) Drosophila homologs of mammalian TNF/TNFR-related molecules regulate segregation of Miranda/Prospero in neuroblasts. EMBO J 25(24):5783–5793
Halbsgut N, Linnemannstons K, Zimmermann LI, Wodarz A (2011) Apical-basal polarity in Drosophila neuroblasts is independent of vesicular trafficking. Mol Biol Cell 22(22):4373–4379
Kraut R, Campos-Ortega JA (1996) Inscuteable, a neural precursor gene of Drosophila, encodes a candidate for a cytoskeleton adaptor protein. Dev Biol 174(1):65–81
Atwood SX, Chabu C, Penkert RR, Doe CQ et al (2007) Cdc42 acts downstream of Bazooka to regulate neuroblast polarity through Par-6 aPKC. J Cell Sci 120(Pt 18):3200–3206
Suzuki A, Ohno S (2006) The PAR-aPKC system: lessons in polarity. J Cell Sci 119(Pt 6):979–987
Barros CS, Phelps CB, Brand AH (2003) Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II promotes the asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants by cortical exclusion rather than active transport. Dev Cell 5(6):829–840
Betschinger J, Mechtler K, Knoblich JA (2003) The Par complex directs asymmetric cell division by phosphorylating the cytoskeletal protein Lgl. Nature 422(6929):326–330
Ohshiro T, Yagami T, Zhang C, Matsuzaki F (2000) Role of cortical tumour-suppressor proteins in asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblast. Nature 408(6812):593–596
Petritsch C, Tavosanis G, Turck CW, Jan LY et al (2003) The Drosophila myosin VI Jaguar is required for basal protein targeting and correct spindle orientation in mitotic neuroblasts. Dev Cell 4(2):273–281
Krahn MP, Klopfenstein DR, Fischer N, Wodarz A (2010) Membrane targeting of Bazooka/PAR-3 is mediated by direct binding to phosphoinositide lipids. Curr Biol 20(7):636–642
von Stein W, Ramrath A, Grimm A, Muller-Borg M et al (2005) Direct association of Bazooka/PAR-3 with the lipid phosphatase PTEN reveals a link between the PAR/aPKC complex and phosphoinositide signaling. Development 132(7):1675–1686
Wang C, Chang KC, Somers G, Virshup D et al (2009) Protein phosphatase 2A regulates self-renewal of Drosophila neural stem cells. Development 136(13):2287–2296
Rossi F, Gonzalez C (2012) Synergism between altered cortical polarity and the PI3K/TOR pathway in the suppression of tumour growth. EMBO Rep 13(2):157–162
Kaltschmidt JA, Davidson CM, Brown NH, Brand AH (2000) Rotation and asymmetry of the mitotic spindle direct asymmetric cell division in the developing central nervous system. Nat Cell Biol 2(1):7–12
Rebollo E, Sampaio P, Januschke J, Llamazares S et al (2007) Functionally unequal centrosomes drive spindle orientation in asymmetrically dividing Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev Cell 12(3):467–474
Rusan NM, Peifer M (2007) A role for a novel centrosome cycle in asymmetric cell division. J Cell Biol 177(1):13–20
Ito K, Hotta Y (1992) Proliferation pattern of postembryonic neuroblasts in the brain of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 149(1):134–148
Rolls MM, Albertson R, Shih HP, Lee CY et al (2003) Drosophila aPKC regulates cell polarity and cell proliferation in neuroblasts and epithelia. J Cell Biol 163(5):1089–1098
Siller KH, Doe CQ (2008) Lis1/dynactin regulates metaphase spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. Dev Biol 319(1):1–9
Yoshiura S, Ohta N, Matsuzaki F (2012) Tre1 GPCR signaling orients stem cell divisions in the Drosophila central nervous system. Dev Cell 22(1):79–91
Gonzalez C (2007) Spindle orientation, asymmetric division and tumour suppression in Drosophila stem cells. Nat Rev Genet 8(6):462–472
Basto R, Lau J, Vinogradova T, Gardiol A et al (2006) Flies without centrioles. Cell 125(7):1375–1386
Januschke J, Gonzalez C (2010) The interphase microtubule aster is a determinant of asymmetric division orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. J Cell Biol 188(5):693–706
Giansanti MG, Gatti M, Bonaccorsi S (2001) The role of centrosomes and astral microtubules during asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblasts. Development 128(7):1137–1145
Conduit PT, Raff JW (2010) Cnn dynamics drive centrosome size asymmetry to ensure daughter centriole retention in Drosophila neuroblasts. Curr Biol 20(24):2187–2192
Januschke J, Llamazares S, Reina J, Gonzalez C (2011) Drosophila neuroblasts retain the daughter centrosome. Nat Commun 2:243
Yamashita YM, Mahowald AP, Perlin JR, Fuller MT (2007) Asymmetric inheritance of mother versus daughter centrosome in stem cell division. Science 315(5811):518–521
Wang X, Tsai JW, Imai JH, Lian WN et al (2009) Asymmetric centrosome inheritance maintains neural progenitors in the neocortex. Nature 461(7266):947–955
Bowman SK, Neumuller RA, Novatchkova M, Du Q et al (2006) The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud regulates spindle orientation in asymmetric cell division. Dev Cell 10(6):731–742
Izumi Y, Ohta N, Hisata K, Raabe T et al (2006) Drosophila Pins-binding protein Mud regulates spindle-polarity coupling and centrosome organization. Nat Cell Biol 8(6):586–593
Siller KH, Cabernard C, Doe CQ (2006) The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nat Cell Biol 8(6):594–600
Nipper RW, Siller KH, Smith NR, Doe CQ et al (2007) Galphai generates multiple Pins activation states to link cortical polarity and spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(36):14306–14311
Siller KH, Doe CQ (2009) Spindle orientation during asymmetric cell division. Nat Cell Biol 11(4):365–374
Wang C, Li S, Januschke J, Rossi F et al (2011) An ana2/ctp/mud complex regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. Dev Cell 21(3):520–533
Speicher S, Fischer A, Knoblich J, Carmena A (2008) The PDZ protein Canoe regulates the asymmetric division of Drosophila neuroblasts and muscle progenitors. Curr Biol 18(11):831–837
Wee B, Johnston CA, Prehoda KE, Doe CQ (2011) Canoe binds RanGTP to promote Pins(TPR)/Mud-mediated spindle orientation. J Cell Biol 195(3):369–376
Johnston CA, Hirono K, Prehoda KE, Doe CQ (2009) Identification of an Aurora-A/PinsLINKER/Dlg spindle orientation pathway using induced cell polarity in S2 cells. Cell 138(6):1150–1163
Cai Y, Yu F, Lin S, Chia W et al (2003) Apical complex genes control mitotic spindle geometry and relative size of daughter cells in Drosophila neuroblast and pI asymmetric divisions. Cell 112(1):51–62
Fuse N, Hisata K, Katzen AL, Matsuzaki F (2003) Heterotrimeric G proteins regulate daughter cell size asymmetry in Drosophila neuroblast divisions. Curr Biol 13(11):947–954
Izumi Y, Ohta N, Itoh-Furuya A, Fuse N et al (2004) Differential functions of G protein and Baz-aPKC signaling pathways in Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric division. J Cell Biol 164(5):729–738
Cabernard C, Prehoda KE, Doe CQ (2010) A spindle-independent cleavage furrow positioning pathway. Nature 467(7311):91–94
Connell M, Cabernard C, Ricketson D, Doe CQ et al (2011) Asymmetric cortical extension shifts cleavage furrow position in Drosophila neuroblasts. Mol Biol Cell 22(22):4220–4226
Crozatier M, Krzemien J, Vincent A (2007) The hematopoietic niche: a Drosophila model, at last. Cell Cycle 6(12):1443–1444
Fuller MT, Spradling AC (2007) Male and female Drosophila germline stem cells: two versions of immortality. Science 316(5823):402–404
Mathur D, Bost A, Driver I, Ohlstein B (2010) A transient niche regulates the specification of Drosophila intestinal stem cells. Science 327(5962):210–213
Blanpain C, Fuchs E (2006) Epidermal stem cells of the skin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22:339–373
van der Flier LG, Clevers H (2009) Stem cells, self-renewal, and differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. Annu Rev Physiol 71:241–260
Porter RL, Calvi LM (2008) Communications between bone cells and hematopoietic stem cells. Arch Biochem Biophys 473(2):193–200
Miller FD, Gauthier-Fisher A (2009) Home at last: neural stem cell niches defined. Cell Stem Cell 4(6):507–510
Siegrist SE, Doe CQ (2006) Extrinsic cues orient the cell division axis in Drosophila embryonic neuroblasts. Development 133(3):529–536
Doe CQ (2008) Neural stem cells: balancing self-renewal with differentiation. Development 135(9):1575–1587
Dumstrei K, Wang F, Hartenstein V (2003) Role of DE-cadherin in neuroblast proliferation, neural morphogenesis, and axon tract formation in Drosophila larval brain development. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 23(8):3325–3335
Pereanu W, Shy D, Hartenstein V (2005) Morphogenesis and proliferation of the larval brain glia in Drosophila. Dev Biol 283(1):191–203
Cheng LY, Bailey AP, Leevers SJ, Ragan TJ et al (2011) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase spares organ growth during nutrient restriction in Drosophila. Cell 146(3):435–447
Neumuller RA, Richter C, Fischer A, Novatchkova M et al (2011) Genome-wide analysis of self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells by transgenic RNAi. Cell Stem Cell 8(5):580–593
Castellanos E, Dominguez P, Gonzalez C (2008) Centrosome dysfunction in Drosophila neural stem cells causes tumors that are not due to genome instability. Curr Biol 18(16):1209–1214
Basto R, Brunk K, Vinadogrova T, Peel N et al (2008) Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis in flies. Cell 133(6):1032–1042
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Alex Gould, Yuu Kimata and Hongyan Wang for helpful comments on the manuscript. RSN was supported by the Medical Research Council and is presently supported by Cancer Research UK; WGS is supported by a NHMRC Peter Doherty Australian Biomedical Fellowship (520307).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sousa-Nunes, R., Somers, W.G. (2013). Mechanisms of Asymmetric Progenitor Divisions in the Drosophila Central Nervous System. In: Hime, G., Abud, H. (eds) Transcriptional and Translational Regulation of Stem Cells. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 786. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6621-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6621-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6620-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6621-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)