“Creating Smooth Spaces in Striated Places”: Toward a Global Theory for Examining Social Justice Leadership in Schools

Chapter
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 29)

Abstract

This chapter shares an original social justice framework that emerged in conjunction with conducting a 2-year ethnography studying the culture of an urban all-girls’ secondary school. I refer to this new interpretive lens as “Facilitating social justice by creating smooth spaces in striated places” or the striated-smooth construct. The meaning-making that occurred during and after the study did not follow a firm temporal chronology or emerge linearly within tidy categorical disciplines. Essentially, my path of learning was a porous and rhizomatic interlacing of past, present, and future – germinating from the intellectual, spiritual, and corporeal –scaffolding upon knowledge, faith, and lived experience. In short, this theory-building experience was more akin to dialogue between mind, soul, and body. Rather than “own” this theory of social justice and explicitly detail a list of “rules” one must follow, I offer this inspiration as just one conception of social justice that might be used to facilitate the creative thinking of others that has potential to move the field forward as well as be applied to other societal contexts.

Keywords

Social Justice Cultural Capital School Culture Prior Theory Smooth Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2002a). Course-taking patterns. In The Jossey-Bass reader on gender in education (pp. 277–300). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2002b). The evaded curriculum. In The Jossey-Bass reader on gender in education (pp. 361–374). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Blount, J. (2008). History as a way of understanding and motivation. In I. Bogotch, F. Beachum, J. Blount, J. Brooks, F. English, & J. Jansen (Eds.), Radicalizing educational leadership: Dimensions of social justice (pp. 17–37). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1979/1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Dantley, M. E., & Tillman, L. C. (2009). Social justice and moral transformative leadership. In C. Marshall & M. Oliva (Eds.), Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education (2nd ed., pp. 19–34). New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  8. Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (2009). Shaping school culture: Pitfalls, paradoxes, and promises (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, L. (Ed.). (1962). The essential Gandhi: An anthology of his writings on his life, work, and ideas. New York: Vintage Spiritual Classics.Google Scholar
  10. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  11. Garza, E., Reyes, P., & Trueba, E. T. (2004). Resiliency and success: Migrant children in the United States. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Gilson, J. (2002). Single-gender or coeducation for middle-school girls: Does it make a difference in math? In A. Datnow & L. Hubbard (Eds.), Gender in policy and practice: Perspectives on single-sex and coeducational schooling (pp. 227–242). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Greenleaf, R. (2002). Servant leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kirst, M. (2007). Secondary and postsecondary linkages. In S. Dickert-Conlin & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Economic inequality and higher education (pp. 44–66). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mansfield, K. C. (2011). Troubling social justice in a single-sex public school: An ethnography of an emerging school culture. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  18. Mansfield, K. C. (2013a). The growth of single-sex schools: Federal policy meets local needs and interests. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 21(78). Available at: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1181.
  19. Mansfield, K. C. (2013b). “I love these girls – I was these girls”: Women leading for social justice in a single-sex public school. Journal of School Leadership, 23(4), 633–656.Google Scholar
  20. Mansfield, K. C. (in press). ‘More than a school’: Providing a safe space for girls to rewrite, direct, and act their life stories. In W. S. Newcomb & K. C. Mansfield (Eds.), Women interrupting, disrupting, and rewriting educational policy and practice (pp. XX–XX). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Margolin, L. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Margolis, J., & Fisher, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. McKenzie, K. B., & Scheurich, J. J. (2004). Equity traps: A useful construct for preparing principals to lead school that are successful with racially diverse students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 601–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mickelson, R. A. (2003). Gender, Bourdieu, and the anomaly of women’s achievement redux. Sociology of Education, 76(4), 373–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Oakes, J., & Wells, A. S. (1998, March). Detracking for high student achievement. Educational Leadership, 55, 38–41.Google Scholar
  27. Oakes, J., Wells, A. S., Jones, M., & Datnow, A. (1997). Detracking: The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 482–510.Google Scholar
  28. Pallais, A., & Turner, S. E. (2007). Access to elites. In S. Dickert-Conlin & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Economic inequality and higher education (pp. 128–156). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Paredes Scribner, A. (1999). High-performing Hispanic schools: An introduction. In P. Reyes, J. D. Scribner, & A. Paredes Scribner (Eds.), Lessons from high-performing Hispanic schools: Creating learning communities (pp. 1–18). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Parker, L. H. (1997). A model for gender-inclusive school science: Lessons from feminist scholarship. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 185–200). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  32. Sadker, D. (1999). Gender equity: Still knocking at the classroom door. Educational Leadership, 56(7), 22–26. Available at: http://www.sadker.org/ClassroomDoor.html,Google Scholar
  33. Scribner, J. D., Young, M. D., & Pedroza, A. (1999). Building collaborative relationships with parents. In P. Reyes, J. D. Scribner, & A. Paredes Scribner (Eds.), Lessons from high- performing Hispanic schools: Creating learning communities (pp. 36–60). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  34. Shields, C. M. (2004). Dialogic leadership for social justice: Overcoming pathologies of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Southworth, S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2007). The interactive effects of race, gender and school composition on college track placement. Social Forces, 86(2).Google Scholar
  36. Spears, J. D. (2008). Seeing gender. The Physics Teacher, 46, 136–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Nomadic inquiry in the smooth spaces of the field: A preface. In E. A. St. Pierre & W. S. Pillow (Eds.), Working the ruins: Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education (pp. 258–283). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Swafford, J. (1992). The vintage guide to classical music. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  39. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1992). Learning together: A history of coeducation in American public schools. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Valencia, R. R. (2002a). The plight of Chicano students: An overview of schooling conditions and outcomes. In R. R. Valencia (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present and future (2nd ed., pp. 3–51). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Valencia, R. R. (2002b). Conclusions: Towards Chicano school success. In R. R. Valencia (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present and future (2nd ed., pp. 365–369). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Valencia, R. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: US-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  45. Walker, J. (2006). Principals and counsellors working for social justice: A complementary leadership team. Guidance and Counseling, 21(2), 114–124.Google Scholar
  46. Washington, J. M. (Ed.). (1986). A testament of hope: The essential writings and speeches of Martin Luther King, Jr. San Francisco, CA: Harper.Google Scholar
  47. Welton, A. D. (2011). Navigating networks of opportunity: Understanding how social networks connect students to postsecondary resources in integrated and segregated high schools. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  48. Winkle-Wagner, R., & McKinney, T. R. F. (2010). Where is cultural capital? Mapping the terrain of operationalizations and proxies of a key concept in higher education research. Paper presented at Association for the Study of Higher Education, Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
  49. Wyn, J., & Wilson, B. (1997). Improving girls’ educational outcomes. In C. Marshall (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 239–249). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zigarelli, M. (1996). An empirical test of conclusions from effective schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(2), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Educational Leadership and PolicyVirginia Commonwealth UniversityFredericksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations