Advertisement

Non-genetic Inheritance and Evolution

  • Tobias Uller
Chapter
Part of the History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences book series (HPTL, volume 1)

Abstract

Teaching evolution usually means an exclusive focus on transmission genetics as the basis for heredity. The stability of DNA sequences gives the impression that the developmental history of individuals can be set aside and evolutionary change in phenotypes can be described as change in gene frequencies. This is the textbook version of evolution and the view that the majority of evolutionary biologists subscribe to. The unique position of DNA in heredity is now being challenged, however. Mounting empirical evidence suggests that phenotypic stability within lineages and differences between lineages can originate and be maintained via epigenetic and behavioural mechanisms, even in the absence of genetic variation. This raises questions regarding the evolutionary implications of such non-genetic mechanisms of inheritance, including whether they can bias the rate and direction of evolution or allow inheritance of acquired characters. In this chapter, I outline the historical background to the development of the transmission genetics view of heredity and how recent findings in molecular, developmental, and behavioural biology challenge the textbooks. I continue by showing how the heterogeneous cluster of non-genetic mechanisms of inheritance can contribute to an expanded version of evolutionary theory. Although it turns out that the special role played by genes in evolution can also be played by other inheritance systems, the main conceptual advantage of recognizing non-genetic mechanisms of inheritance is that it stimulates an explicit consideration of developmental processes in evolutionary explanations. This helps us to connect the processes responsible for within-generation change (‘proximate questions’ or the domain of developmental biology) with among-generation change (‘ultimate question’ or the domain of evolutionary biology). Furthermore, it shows how the teaching of fundamental concepts in evolutionary biology can benefit from philosophical analysis informed by contemporary biological research.

Keywords

Evolutionary Theory Evolutionary Change Adaptive Evolution Evolutionary Implication Modern Synthesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Kostas Kampourakis for the invitation to contribute to this volume and Sinead English, Heikki Helanterä, Kostas Kampourakis, Eva Jablonka, and Nick Shea for comments on the chapter. My work on non-genetic inheritance is funded in part by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2011) under grant agreement n° 259679.

References

  1. Allen, G.E. 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The man and his science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, G.E. 1983. T.H. Morgan and the influence of mechanistic materialism on the development of the gene concept 1910–1940. American Zoologist 23: 829–843.Google Scholar
  3. Alters, B.J., and C.E. Nelson. 2002. Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution 56: 1891–1901.Google Scholar
  4. Amundson, R. 2005. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought. Structure and synthesis. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arthur, W. 2010. Evolution: A developmental approach. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Avital, E., and E. Jablonka. 2000. Animal traditions. Behavioural inheritance in evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badyaev, A.V. 2009. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: An empirical test of the Baldwin effect. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 1125–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Badyaev, A.V. 2011. Origin of the fittest: Link between emergent variation and evolutionary change as a critical question in evolutionary biology. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278: 1921–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Badyaev, A.V., and T. Uller. 2009. Parental effects in ecology and evolution: Mechanisms, processes and implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 1169–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baldwin, J.M. 1902. Development and evolution. New York: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Bergstrom, C.T., and M. Rosvall. 2011. The transmission sense of information. Biology and Philosophy 26: 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonduriansky, R. 2012. Rethinking heredity, again. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourke, A.F.G. 2011. Principles of social evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Boyd, R., and P.J. Richerson. 2005. The origins and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Carlson, E.O. 2011. Mutation. The history of an idea from Darwin to genomics. Cold Spring Harbor: CSH Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., and M.W. Feldman. 1981. Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Champagne, F.A., and J.P. Curley. 2012. Genetic and epigenetics of parental care. In Evolution of parental care, ed. N. Royle, P.T. Smiseth, and M. Kölliker, 304–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cheverud, J.M., and J.B. Wolf. 2009. The genetics and evolutionary consequences of maternal effects. In Maternal effects in mammals, ed. D. Maestripieri and J.M. Mateo, 11–37. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, J. 1979. Maternal constraints in development. In Maternal effects in development, ed. D.R. Newth and M. Balls, 1–28. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Danchin, É., A. Charmantier, F.A. Champagne, A. Mesoudi, B. Pujol, and S. Blanchet. 2011. Beyond DNA: Integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics 12: 475–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Darwin, C. 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  22. Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Day, T., and R. Bonduriansky. 2011. A unified approach to the evolutionary consequences of genetic and nongenetic inheritance. The American Naturalist 178: E18–E36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Dougherty, M.J. 2009. Closing the gap: Inverting the genetics curriculum to ensure an informed public. American Journal of Human Genetics 85: 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Falk, R. 2009. Genetic analysis. A history of genetic thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisher, R.A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Galton, F. 1876. A theory of heredity. Journal of the Anthropological Institute 5: 329–348.Google Scholar
  29. Gardner, A. 2008. The Price equation. Current Biology 18: R198–R202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gardner, A. 2011. Kin selection under blending inheritance. Journal of Theoretical Biology 284: 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilbert, S.F., and D. Epel. 2009. Ecological developmental biology. Integrating epigenetics, medicine and evolution. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Gissis, S.B., and E. Jablonka. 2011. Transformations of Lamarckism: From subtle fluids to molecular biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. Darwinian populations and natural selection. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Godfrey-Smith, P. 2011. Senders, receivers, and genetic information: Comments on Bergstrom and Rosvall. Biology and Philosophy 26: 171–181.Google Scholar
  35. Gottlieb, G. 1992. Individual development and evolution. The genesis of novel behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Griffiths, P.E., and R.D. Gray. 1994. Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation. Journal of Philosophy 91: 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Griffiths, Paul E., and Karola Stotz. 2007. Gene. In Cambridge companion to philosophy of biology, ed. Michael Ruse and David Hull, 85–102. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Helanterä, H., and T. Uller. 2010. The Price equation and extended inheritance. Philosophy and Theory in Biology 2: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hodge, M.J.S. 1985. Darwin as a lifelong generation theorist. In The Darwinian heritage, ed. D. Kohn, 207–243. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Huxley, J. 1942. Evolution. The modern synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  42. Jablonka, E. 2002. Information: Its interpretation, its inheritance, and its sharing. Philosophy of Science 69: 578–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jablonka, E., and M. Lamb. 1995. Epigenetic inheritance and evolution. The Lamarckian dimension. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jablonka, E., and M. Lamb. 2005. Evolution in four dimensions. Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Jablonka, E., and M.J. Lamb. 2006. The evolution of information in the major transitions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 239: 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jablonka, E., and G. Raz. 2009. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: Prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. The Quarterly Review of Biology 84: 131–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johannsen, W. 1909. Elemente der exacten Erblichkeitslehre. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
  48. Kampourakis, K. 2013a. Mendel and the path to genetics: Portraying science as a social process. Science & Education 22(2–3): 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kampourakis, K. 2013b. Teaching about adaptation: Why evolutionary history matters. Science & Education 22(2–3): 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kampourakis, K., and V. Zogza. 2009. Preliminary evolutionary explanations: A basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science & Education 18: 1313–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laland, K.N., K. Sterelny, J. Odling-Smee, W. Hoppitt, and T. Uller. 2011. Cause and effect in biology revisited: Is Mayr’s proximate-ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science 334: 1512–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Laland, K.N., J. Odling-Smee, W. Hoppitt, and T. Uller. 2012. More on how and why: Cause and effect in biology revisited. Biology & Philosophy, (in press).Google Scholar
  53. Lederman, N.G. 2007. Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Handbook of research on science education, ed. S.K. Abell and N.G. Lederman, 831–880. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Lehrmann, Daniel. 1970. Semantic and conceptual issues in the nature-nurture problem. In Development and evolution of behavior, ed. R. Aronson, E. Tobach, D.S. Lehrman, and J.S. Rosenblatt, 17–52. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
  55. Leimar, O., P. Hammerstein, and T.J.M. Van Dooren. 2006. A new perspective on developmental plasticity and the principles of adaptive morph determination. American Naturalist 167: 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lerner, I.M. 1950. Population genetics and animal improvement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lewontin, R.C. 1983. Gene, organism, and environment. In Evolution from molecules to men, ed. D.S. Bendall, 273–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Mameli, M. 2004. Nongenetic selection and nongenetic inheritance. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55: 35–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Matthews, M.R. 1994. Science teaching. The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mayr, E. 1961. Cause and effect in biology. Science 134: 1501–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mayr, E. 1982. The growth of biological thought. Diversity, evolution and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Mayr, E. 1993. Proximate and ultimate causations. Biology and Philosophy 8: 93–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mills Shaw, K.R., K. Van Horne, H. Zhang, and J. Boughman. 2008. Essay contest reveals misconceptions of high school students in genetics content. Genetics 178: 1157–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mivart, St G. 1871. On the genesis of species. New York: D. Appleton & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moczek, A.P. 2007. Developmental capacitance, genetic accommodation, and adaptive evolution. Evolution & Development 9: 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Morgan, T.H. 1910. Chromosomes and heredity. American Naturalist 44: 449–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morgan, T.H., A.H. Sturtevant, H.J. Muller, and C.B. Bridges. 1915. The mechanisms of Mendelian heredity. New York: Henry Holt & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Müller-Wille, S., and H.-J. Rheinberger. 2007. Heredity produced. At the crossroads of biology, politics, and culture, 1500–1870. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Müller-Wille, S., and H.-J. Rheinberger. 2012. A cultural history of heredity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Neumann-Held, E.M., and C. Rehmann-Sutter. 2006. Genes in development. Re-reading the molecular paradigm. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Newth, D.R., and M. Balls. 1979. Maternal effects in development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Nijhout, H.F. 1990. Metaphors and the role of genes in development. BioEssays 12: 441–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Odling-Smee, F.J., K.N. Laland, and M.W. Feldman. 2003. Niche construction. The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Okasha, S. 2006. Evolution and the levels of selection. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Oyama, S. 1985. The ontogeny of information. Developmental systems and evolution. 2nd ed. 2000. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Pfennig, D.W., and R.A. Martin. 2009. A maternal effect mediates rapid population divergence and character displacement in spadefoot toads. Evolution 63: 898–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pigliucci, M., and G.B. Müller. 2010. Evolution. The expanded synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  79. Price, G.R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227: 520–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Provine, W.B. 1971. The origins of population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  81. Riddle, O. 1909. Our knowledge of melanin color formation and its bearing on the Mendelian description of heredity. Biological Bulletin 16: 316–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Robinson, S.R., and V. Méndez-Gallardo. 2011. Amniotic fluid as an extended milieu intérieur. In Developmental science, behaviour, and genetics, ed. K.E. Hood, C.T. Halpern, G. Greenberg, and R.M. Lerner, 234–284. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  83. Rosenblatt, J.S. 2010. Behavioral development during the mother-young interaction in placental mammals. In Developmental science, behaviour, and genetics, ed. K.E. Hood, C.T. Halpern, G. Greenberg, and R.M. Lerner, 205–233. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  84. Sapp, J. 1987. Beyond the gene. Cytoplasmic inheritance and the struggle for authority in genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Schmalhausen, I.I. 1949. Factors of evolution. The theory of stabilizing selection. Philadelphia: Blakeston Co.Google Scholar
  86. Schoener, T.W. 2011. The newest synthesis: Understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. Science 331: 426–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shea, N. 2009. Imitation as an inheritance system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364: 2429–2443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Shea, N. 2011. Developmental systems theory formulated as a claim about inherited representations. Philosophy of Science 78: 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Shea, N. (in press). Two modes of transgenerational information transmission. In Signaling, commitment, and emotion, ed. B. Calcott et al. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  90. Shea, N., I. Pen, and T. Uller. 2011. Three epigenetic information channels and their different roles in evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24: 1178–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Simpson, G.G. 1944. Tempo and mode in evolution. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Skyrms, B. 2010. Signals. Evolution, learning and information. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Smith, J.E.H. 2006. The problem of animal generation in early modern philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Smith, M.U. 2010. Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution II: Pedagogical issues. Science and Education 19: 539–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stebbins, G.L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Sterelny, K., K.C. Smith, and M. Dickison. 1996. The extended replicator. Biology and Philosophy 11: 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Stubbe, H. 1972. History of genetics, from prehistoric times to the rediscovery of Mendel’s laws. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  98. Sturtevant, A.H. 1913. The linear arrangement of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila, as shown by their mode of association. The Journal of Experimental Zoology 14: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tal, O., E. Kisdi, and E. Jablonka. 2010. Epigenetic contribution to covariance between relatives. Genetics 184: 1037–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Uller, T. 2008. Developmental plasticity and the evolution of parental effects. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Uller, T. 2012. Parental effects in development and evolution. In Evolution of parental care, ed. N. Royle, P. Smiseth, and M. Kölliker, 247–266. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Uller, T., and H. Helanterä. 2011. From the origin of sex-determining factors to the evolution of sex-determining systems. The Quarterly Review of Biology 86: 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Uller, T., and I. Pen. 2011. A theoretical model of the evolution of maternal effects under parent-­offspring conflict. Evolution 65: 2075–2084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Waddington, C.H. 1942. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150: 563–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Warner, D.A. 2011. Sex determination in reptiles. In Hormones and reproduction of vertebrates, volume 3: Reptiles, ed. D.O. Norris and K. Lopez, 1–38. Amsterdam: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Waters, C.K. 1994. Genes made molecular. Philosophy of Science 61(2): 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Waters, P.D., M.C. Wallis, and J.A.M. Graves. 2007. Mammalian sex – Origin and evolution of the Y chromosome and SRY. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 18: 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Weismann, A. 1893. The germ-plasm. A theory of heredity. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
  109. West, S.A. 2009. Sex allocation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  110. West-Eberhard, M.J. 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. West-Eberhard, M.J. 2005. Phenotypic accommodation: Adaptive innovation due to developmental plasticity. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution 304B: 610–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edward Grey Institute, Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations