Skip to main content

The Structure and Dynamics of Agricultural Landscapes as Drivers of Biodiversity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture

Abstract

The study of the relationships between agriculture and biodiversity is important to sustain biodiversity for the future. The landscape level has an influence, which has been until now mainly related to the importance of semi-natural elements. But in agricultural areas crop land is often dominant and acts on biodiversity by the resources it provides and the effects of disturbances induced by agricultural practices. The mosaic of crops is ephemeral and highly dynamic in space and time according to farming practices and crop rotations. The aim of this chapter is to assess the role of agricultural landscape heterogeneity on biodiversity. Landscape heterogeneity may be measured from different perspectives, considering non-cropped areas versus crop ones, or taking into consideration the dynamics of the mosaic of crops and agricultural practices. From studies on a long term ecological research site in Brittany, France, we present how these different approaches of landscape heterogeneity allow a better understanding of the diversity of processes driving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Most of all we underline the necessity to include knowledge of farming systems and farming practices in the analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wild bees comprise of social species (Bombus sp.) and solitary bees (even if different forms of primitive or advanced social behavior exist in some species). Our study only focuses on solitary bees, which represent more than 80 % of wild bee species in Europe.

References

  • Allen TFH, O’Neill RV, Hoekstra TW. Inter level relations in ecological research and management: some working principles from hierarchy theory. J Appl Syst Anal. 1987;14:63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston DG, Bradley JR, Schmitt DP, Coble HD. Relationship of Heliothis zea predators, parasitoids and entomopathogens to canopy development in soybean as affected by Heterodera glycines and weeds. Entomol Exp Appl. 1991;58:279–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auffret AG, Cousins SAO. Past and present management influences the seed bank and seed rain in a rural landscape mosaic. J Appl Ecol. 2011;48:1278–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviron S, Burel F, Baudry J, Schermann N. Carabid assemblages in agricultural landscapes: impacts of habitat features, landscape context at different spatial scales and farming intensity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2005;108:205–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviron S, Kindlmann P, Burel F. Conservation of butterfly populations in dynamic landscapes: the role of farming practices and landscape mosaic. Ecol Model. 2007;205:135–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviron S, Nitsch H, Jeanneret P, Buholzer S, Luka H, Pfiffner L, Pozzi S, Schüpbach B, Walter T, Herzog F. Ecological cross compliance promotes farmland biodiversity in Switzerland. Front Ecol Environ. 2009;7:247–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Burel F. La mesure de la biodiversité spatiale: utilisation dans les évaluations d’impact. Acta Oecologica Oecologica Applicata. 1982;177–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:182–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D, Bugter R, Arens P, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Baudry J, Bukacek R, Burel F, Cerny M, De Blust G, De Cock R, Diekotter T, Dietz H, Dirksen J, Dormann C, Durka W, Frenzel M, Hamersky R, Hendrickx F, Herzog F, Klotz S, Koolstra B, Lausch A, Le Coeur D, Maelfait JP, Opdam P, Roubalova M, Schermann A, Schermann N, Schmidt T, Schweiger O, Smulders MJM, Speelmans M, Simova P, Verboom J, Van Wingerden WKRE, Zobel M. Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol. 2008;45:141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel J, Ferry C, Frochot B. la méthode des indices d’abondance (IPA) ou des relevés d’avifaune par “station d’écoute”. Alauda. 1970;38:55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brakefield PM. Ecological studies on the butterfly Maniola jurtina in Britain. I—Adult behaviour, micro distribution and dispersal. J Anim Ecol. 1982;51:713–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressan A, Moral García FJ, Sémétey O, Boudon-Padieu E. Spatio-temporal pattern of Pentastiridius leporinus migration in an ephemeral cropping system. Agric For Entomol. 2010;12:59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burel F, Baudry J, Butet A, Clergeau P, Delettre Y, Le Coeur D, Dubs F, Morvan N, Paillat G, Petit S, Thenail C, Brunel E, Lefeuvre JC. Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes. Acta Oecologica. 1998;19:47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burel F, Baudry J. Landscape ecology: concepts, methods, and applications. Enfield: N.H. Science Publishers; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burel F, Baudry J. Habitat quality and connectivity in agricultural landscapes: the role of land use systems at various scales in time. Ecol Ind. 2005;5:305–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrière Y, Ellsworth PC, Dutilleul P, Ellers-Kirk C, Barkley V, Antilla L. A GIS-based approach for area wide pest management: the scales of Lygus hesperus movements to cotton from alfalfa, weeds, and cotton. Entomol Exp Appl. 2006;118:203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Concepción E, Díaz M, Baquero R. Effects of landscape complexity on the ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes. Landscape Ecol. 2008;23:135–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deckers B, De Becker P, Honnay O, Hermy M, Muys B. Sunken roads as habitats for forest plant species in a dynamic agricultural landscape: effects of age and isolation. J Biogeogr. 2005;32:99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Snoo GR, Van der Poll RJ. Effect of herbicide drift on adjacent boundary vegetation. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 1999;73:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech JM. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:81–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos. 1992;65:169–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernoult E, Tremauville Y, Cellier D, Margerie P, Langlois E, Alard D. Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: Past or present patterns? Biol Conserv. 2006;127:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L. Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment. Theor Popul Biol. 1992;41:300–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin J-L. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett. 2011;14:101–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Brosi B, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Goldman R, Goldstein J, Lindenmayer D, Manning A, Mooney H, Pejchar L, Ranganathan J, Tallis H. Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming? Front Ecol Environ. 2008;6(7):380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT, Baudry J. Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology. Environ Manage. 1984;8:499–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon CD. Small mammals in farm wood lands: the effects of habitat, isolation and surrounding land-use patterns. J Appl Ecol. 1997;34:530–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel D, Thies C, Tscharntke T. Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity. Perspect Plant Ecol, Evol Syst. 2005;7:85–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne AJ, Hassall M, Sotherton NW. Effects of cereal headland treatments on the abundance and movements of three species of carabid beetles. Appl Soil Ecol. 1998;9:417–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzschuh A, Dormann CF, Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I. Expansion of mass-flowering crops leads to transient pollinator dilution and reduced wild plant pollination. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 2011;278:3444–3451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joannon A, Bro E, Thenail C, Baudry J. Crop patterns and habitat preferences of the grey partridge farmland bird. Agron Sustainable Dev. 2008;28:379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy GG, Storer NP. Life systems of polyphagous arthropod pests in temporally unstable cropping systems. Ann Rev Entomol. 2000;45:467–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy GG, Storer NP. Life systems of polyphagous arthropod pests in temporally unstable cropping systems. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:467–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kindlmann P, Burel F. Connectivity measures: a review. Landscape Ecol. 2008;23:879–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Díaz M, Esteban J, Fernández F, Gabriel D, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Jöhl R, Knop E, Kruess A, Marshall EJP, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J, West TM, Yela JL. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett. 2006;9:243–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Rundlã FM, Scheper J, Smith HG, Tscharntke T. Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline? Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26:474–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm M. Man-made bee habitats in the anthropogenous landscape of central Europe-substitutes for threatened or destroyed riverine habitats? The conservation of bees. In: Matheson A, Buchmann SL, O’Toole C, Westrich P, Williams IH, editors. 1996. p. 17–34. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Bommarco R, Guardiola M, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Kuussaari M, Lindborg R, Öckinger E, Pärtel M, Pino J, Pöyry J, Raatikainen KM, Sang A, Stefanescu C, Teder T, Zobel M, Steffan-Dewenter I. Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecol Lett. 2010;13:597–605.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuussaari M, Hyvönen T, Härmä O. Pollinator insects benefit from rotational fallows. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011;143:28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Féon Le V, Burel F, Chifflet R, Henry M, Ricroch A, Vaissière BE, Baudry J. Solitary bee abundance and species richness in dynamic agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroux X, Barbault R, Baudry J, Burel F, Doussan I, Garnier E, Herzog F, Lavorel S, Lifran R, Roger-Estrade J, Sarthou JP, Trommetter M. Agriculture et biodiversité: valoriser les synergies, Paris, éds. Quae. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi A, Javelle A, Baudry J, BUREL F. Interdisciplinary analysis of hedgerow network landscapes sustainability. Landscape Res. 2010;35:391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeus JHA. The transformation of agricultural landscapes in Western Europe. Sci Total Environ. 1993;129:171–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Men XY, Ge F, Yardim EN, Parajulee MN. Evaluation of winter wheat as a potential relay crop for enhancing biological control of cotton aphids in seedling cotton. Biocontrol. 2004;49:701–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger JP. Landscape ecology: perspectives based on the 2007 IALE world congress. Landscape Ecol. 2008;23:501–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millan-Pena N, Butet A, Delettre Y, Paillat G, Morand P, Le Du L, Burel F. Response of small mammal community to changes in western French agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 2003;18:265–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millan De La Pena N, Butet A, Delettre Y, Morant P, Burel F. Landscape context and carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities of hedgerows in western France. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2003;94:59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morandin LA, Winston ML, Abbott VA, Franklin MT. Can pastureland increase wild bee abundance in agriculturally intense areas? Basic Appl Ecol. 2007;8:117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouin A, Paillat G, Butet A, Burel F. Spatial dynamics of wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in an agricultural landscape under intensive use in the Mont Saint Michel Bay (France) agriculture. Ecosyst Environ. 2000;78:159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purtauf T, Roschewitz I, Dauber J, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Wolters V. Landscape context of organic and conventional farms: Influences on carabid beetle diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2005;108:165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ. Post war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J Appl Ecol. 2002;39:157–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusch A, Valantin-Morison M, Sarthou J-P, Roger-Estrade J. Multi-scale effects of landscape complexity and crop management on pollen beetle parasitism rate. Landscape Ecol. 2011;26:473–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooley RL, Branch LC. Habitat quality of source patches and connectivity in fragmented landscapes. Biodivers Conserv. 2011;20:1611–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuler RE, Roulston TH, Farris GE. Farming practices influence wild pollinator populations on squash and pumpkin. J Econ Entomol. 2005;98:790–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger O, Maelfait JP, Van Wingerden W, Hendricks F, Billeter R, Speelmans M, Augenstein I, Aukema B, Aviron S, Bailey DW, Bukacek R, Burel F, Diekotter T, Dirksen J, Frenzel M, Herzog F, Liira J, Roubalova M, Bugter R. Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organizational levels and spatial scales. J Appl Ecol. 2005;42:1129–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Succession of bee communities on fallows. Ecography. 2001;24:83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology. 2002;83:1421–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thenail C, Baudry J. Variation of farm spatial land use pattern according to the structure of the hedgerow network (bocage) landscape: a case study in northeast Brittany. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2004;101:53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorbek P, Topping CJ. The influence of landscape diversity and heterogeneity on spatial dynamics of agrobiont linyphiid spiders: an individual-based model. Biocontrol. 2005;50:1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett. 2005a;8:857–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Rand TA, Bianchi F. The landscape context of trophic interactions: insect spillover across the crop-non crop interface. Ann Zool Fenn. 2005b;42:421–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vane Wright RI, Ackery PR. The biology of butterflies. British Museum: Academic Press; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasseur C, Joannon A, Aviron S, Burel F, Meynard JM, Baudry J. The cropping systems mosaic: how does the hidden heterogeneity of agricultural landscapes drive populations? Agri Ecosyst Environ (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasseur C. Contrôles exercés par les mosaïques de systèmes de culture sur les dynamiques du carabe Pterostichus melanarius Illiger (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Thèse de l’Université de Rennes 1. 2012. p. 205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibull A-C, Bengtsson J, Nohlgren E. Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: the role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography. 2000;23:743–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecol Lett. 2003;6:961–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westrich P. Habitat requirements of central European bees and the problems of partial habitats. Matheson A, Buchmann SL, O’Toole C, Westrich P, Williams IH, editors. The conservation of bees. London: Academic; 1996. p. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger SA. Cyclic colonization in predictably ephemeral habitats: a template for biological control in annual crop systems. Biol Control. 1997;10:4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

LTER research is supported by the zone atelier program of INEE-CNRS, additional support is provided by INRA, the ministry of environment, the European Union and the National Research Agency. We thank three anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francoise Burel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burel, F., Aviron, S., Baudry, J., Le Féon, V., Vasseur, C. (2013). The Structure and Dynamics of Agricultural Landscapes as Drivers of Biodiversity . In: Fu, B., Jones, K. (eds) Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics