Advertisement

Energy Efficient Data Transmission Mechanism in Wireless Sensor Networks

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 235)

Abstract

In dense deployments of sensor nodes in a Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), sensors are spatially correlated and they may sense same information and send the same information to its sink node. So each sensor node wastes energy in transmitting redundant data. Furthermore, sensor nodes near sink node may treat more data and use more energy than other node. In this paper we propose a energy efficient data transmission mechanism which reduces redundant data transmission and saves node energy. Using modified RTS control frame of IEEE 802.11 MAC and direction information of received data packet, each sensor node may drop its measured redundant data. Results have shown that our data transmission mechanism outperforms other mechanisms in terms of energy saving and amount of data traffics.

Keywords

MAC Protocol Wireless sensor networks Data gathering Clustering Energy efficient 

References

  1. 1.
    Ye W, Heidemann J, Esrin D (2004) Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, vol. 12, Issue 3, pp 493–506 IEEEGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Polastre J, Hill J, Culler D (2004) Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In: ACM SenSys ’04, ACM, Baltimore, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buettner M, Yee GV, Anderson E, Han R (2006) X-MAC: A short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In: ACM SenSys ’06, ACMGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun Y, Gurewitz O, Johnson DB (2008) RI-MAC: A receiver-initiated asynchronous duty cycle MAC protocol for dynamic traffic loads in wireless sensor networks. In: ACM SenSys ’08, ACMGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Autenrieth M, Frey H (2011) PaderMAC: A low-power, Low-latency MAC layer with opportunistic forwarding support for wireless sensor networks. Ad-hop, Mobile, and Wireless Networks, pp 117–130Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hosen ASMS, Kim SH, Cho GH (2012) An energy efficient cluster formation and maintenance scheme for wireless sensor networks. J Inf Commun Convergence Eng (JICCE) 10(3):276–283Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Encarnacion NN, Yang H (2012) On the performance evaluation of energy-aware sleep scheduling (EASS) in energy harvesting WSN (EH-WSN). J Inf Commun Convergence Eng (JICCE) 10(3):263–268Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim SC, Jeon JH, Park HJ (2012) QoS aware energy-efficient (QAEE) MAC protocol for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. In: Convergence and hybrid information technology 2012, LNCS, vol. 7425, pp 41–48. Springer, DeajeonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schurgers C, Srivastava MB (2001) Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceeding of IEEE military communications conference, vol. 1, pp 357–361, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahadevaswamy UB, Shanmukhaswamy MN (2010) An energy efficient reliable multipath routing protocol for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. Int J Comp Sci Inf Secur 8(2):59–64Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwang S, Jin GJ, Shin C, Kim B (2009) Energy-aware data gathering in wireless sensor networks. In: 6th IEEE conference on consumer communications and networking, CCNC, pp 1–4, IEEE, Las Vegas Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Le HC, Guyennet H, Felea V (2007) OBMAC: an overhearing based MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. pp 547–553, IEEEGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seong Cheol Kim
    • 1
  • Jun Heon Jeon
    • 1
  • Hyun Joo Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Sangmyung UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations