State Level Applications: Developing a Policy Support and Public Awareness Indicator Project

  • Rhonda PhillipsEmail author
  • HeeKyung Sung
  • Andrea Whitsett
Part of the Community Quality-of-Life Indicators book series (CQLI, volume 4)


Indicator projects have numerous goals and one of the most pressing is providing information to support policy decision-making. Whether it is to encourage policy changes or monitor existing policy, indicators can often be the focus point for starting dialogue around issues and potential solutions. Further, indicator projects can provide a public awareness mechanism, bringing data to the forefront so that reactions and responses by those most impacted can be addressed. This chapter begins with an exploration of the policy support and public awareness dimensions of indicator projects. While there are numerous local, regional and even national indicator projects, there are less at the state level. However, at this level, indicators can often serve as discussion points for addressing policy issues while at the same time broadening awareness of key concerns. An overview of state level projects is provided, including by types and approaches. Begun in 2007, Arizona Indicators has been selected for the case study, examining the process of creating a support system for policy and public awareness.


State Level Public Awareness Human Development Index Charter School Urban Heat Island Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2011). Kids count data center. Available from
  2. Arizona Indicators. (2011). About Arizona indicators. Retrieved August 13, 2011, from
  3. Besleme, K., & Mullin, M. (1997). Community indicators and healthy communities. National Civic Review, 86(1), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burd-Sharps, S., Guyer, P. N., Lechterman, T., & Lewis, K. (2011). The American human development index: Results from Mississippi and Louisiana. In J. Sirgy, R. Phillips, & D. Rahtz (Eds.), Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases V. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Center for the Future of Arizona. (2009). The Arizona we wan. Phoenix: Center for the Future of Arizona.Google Scholar
  6. Center for the Future of Arizona. (2010). Arizona civic health index 2010. Phoenix: Center for the Future of Arizona.Google Scholar
  7. Center for the Future of Arizona. (2011). About the Gallup Arizona poll. Retrieved October 31, 2011, from
  8. Center on the Family. (2011). Retrieved October 15, 2011, from
  9. Community Indicators Consortium. (2011). Retrieved September 13, 2011, from
  10. Custance, J. (2002). The development of national, regional and local indicators of sustainable development in the United Kingdom. Statistical Journal, 19(1–2), 19–28.Google Scholar
  11. Dluhy, M., & Swartz, N. (2006). Connecting knowledge and policy: The promise of community indicators in the United States. Social Indicators Research, 79(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox, D. R. (2011). Concepts and methods of the U.S. national income and product accounts. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Retrieved from
  13. Gahin, R. (2003). Do indicators help create sustainable communities? Local Environment, 8(6), 661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gahin, R., & Paterson, C. (2001). Community indicators: Past, present, and future. National Civic Review, 90(4), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallopin, G. C. (1997). Indicators and their use: Information for decision-making. In B. Moldan & S. Billharz (Eds.), Sustainability indicators: Report of the project on indicators of sustainable development (pp. 13–28). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Gudmundsson, H. (2003). Making concepts matter: Sustainable mobility and indicator systems in transport policy. International Social Science Journal, 55(176), 199–217.Google Scholar
  17. Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55(1), 1–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hammond, A., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D., & Woodward, R. (1995). Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. New York: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  19. Hezri, A. A., & Dovers, S. R. (2006). Sustainability indicators, policy and governance: Issues for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoernig, H., & Seasons, M. (2005). Understanding indicators. In R. Phillips (Ed.), Community indicators measuring systems (pp. 3–32). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Holden, M. (2006). Revisiting the local impact of community indicators projects: Sustainable Seattle as prophet in its own land. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(3–4), 253–277.Google Scholar
  22. Holman, N. (2009). Incorporating local sustainability indicators into structures of local governance: A review of the literature. Local Environment, 14(4), 365–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kline, E. (2001). Indicators for sustainable development in urban areas. In D. Devuyst, L. Hens, & W. De Lannoy (Eds.), How Green is the city? Sustainability assessment and the management of urban environments (pp. 275–297). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Land, K. C. (1983). Social indicators. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maclaren, V. (1996). Urban sustainability reporting. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(2), 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maryland’s Genuine Progress Indicator. (2011). About genuine progress indicator. Retrieved October 31, 2011, from
  27. Meadows, D. (1998). Indicators and information projects for sustainable development. Hartland Four Corners: Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Michalos, A. (1997). Combining social, economic and environmental indicators to measure sustainable human well-being. Social Indicators Research, 40(1), 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Minnesota, State of Department of Administration. (2003). Minnesota milestones: Measures that matter. Retrieved August 20, 2011, from
  30. Moore, K. A., Brown, B. V., & Scarupa, H. J. (2003). The uses (and misuses) of social indicators: Implications for public policy. Washington, DC: Child Trends, Inc.Google Scholar
  31. Murphy, D. A. (1999). Presenting community-level data in an ‘outcomes and indicators’ framework: Lessons from Vermont’s experience. Public Administration Review, 59(1), 76–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1993). OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews. Environment Monographs 83. OECD/GD (93)179, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  33. Phillips, R. (2003). Community indicators (Planning Advisory Service Report No. 517). Chicago: American Planning Association.Google Scholar
  34. Phillips, R. (2005). Community indicators measuring systems. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  35. Revenga, C. (2005). Developing indicators of ecosystem condition using geographic information systems and remote sensing. Regional Environmental Change, 5(4), 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schlossberg, M., & Zimmerman, A. (2003). Developing statewide indices of environmental, economic, and social sustainability: A look at Oregon and the Oregon benchmarks. Local Environment, 8(6), 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Virginia Performs. (2011). Retrieved October 31, 2011, from
  38. Vogel, J. (1997). The future direction of social indicator research. Social Indicators Research, 42(2), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walker, D. M. (2005). Key national indicator systems: An opportunity to assess national progress, improve performance and strengthen accountability. Journal of Government Financial Management, 54(2), 10–14.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rhonda Phillips
    • 1
    Email author
  • HeeKyung Sung
    • 1
  • Andrea Whitsett
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Community Resources and DevelopmentArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  2. 2.Morrison Institute for Public PolicyPhoenixUSA

Personalised recommendations