Advertisement

Regional Indicators of Well-Being: The Case of France

  • Florence Jany-Catrice
  • Grégory Marlier
Chapter
Part of the Community Quality-of-Life Indicators book series (CQLI, volume 4)

Abstract

The Commission on the Measurement of Performance and Social Progress (Stiglitz et al. 2009) has usefully validated and, above all, given legitimacy to the various criticisms that have been made for several decades now of GDP and economic growth. What is a good society or a good territory? How is its quality of life or its well-being to be assessed? It once seemed that an economic approach to these questions, which are almost philosophical in nature, was broadly sufficient as a means of evaluating the dynamism of territories and, with even greater certainty, their quality. This consensus is being increasingly called into question as a result of a twofold pressure. There is a pressure exerted first by growing awareness of environmental issues, and, second, by increasingly heterogeneous populations. This heterogeneity leads to difficulties in adequately capturing living standards or well-being by ‘average’ measures (of income, consumption, wealth etc.), which have consequently lost some of their meaning (Stiglitz et al. 2009). They are increasingly being debated in international institutions (UNDP 2009; Giovannini et al. 2009), nations, territorial authorities (Jany-Catrice et al. 2009), and even municipalities (see eg. Bardet and Helluin 2010).

Keywords

Disposable Income Social Health Composite Indicator United Nations Development Program French Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Alternatives Economiques. (2011). “Atlas de la santé sociale des régions françaises”, Direction du Développement Durable, de la Prospective et de l’Evaluation, 60 p. http://www.sigale.nordpasdecalais.fr/cartotheque/atlas/atlas_sante_region_france201001v2.pdf
  2. Bardet, F., & Helluin, J.-J. (2010). Comparer les performances des villes. Le Programme des indicateurs pour les villes du monde de la Banque mondiale’. Revue française de socio-économie, 05(1st quarter), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beugelsdijk, S., & van Schaik, T. (2005). Social capital and regional economic growth in European regions; An empirical test. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callon, M., Lascoume, P., & Barthes, Y. (2003). Agir dans un monde incertain. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  5. Cobb, C., & Rixford, C. (2004). Lessons learned from the history of social indicators. Washington, DC: Redefining Progress. 50 p.Google Scholar
  6. Concialdi, P. (2009). « Les indicateurs économiques alternatifs. L’exemple du Bip40 ». Revue Savoir/Agir, pp. 43–56.Google Scholar
  7. Desrosières, A. (1993). La politique des grands nombres. Paris: ed. La Découverte.Google Scholar
  8. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  9. European Council. (2005). Concerted development of social cohesion indicators – Methodological guide. Strasbourg: European Council ed.. 235 p.Google Scholar
  10. Eymard-Duvernay F. (éd). (2006). L’économie des conventions. Méthodes et résultats, Tome 1 Débats (pp. 297–310). Paris: La Découverte, coll. Recherches.Google Scholar
  11. Fourquet, F. (1981). Les comptes de la puissance, Histoire politique de la comptabilité nationale et du plan. Recherches, coll. Encres.Google Scholar
  12. Gadrey, J., & Jany-Catrice, F. (2006). The new indicators of well-being and development. New York: Palgrave/McMillan. 198 p.Google Scholar
  13. Gadrey, J., & Jany-Catrice, F. (2006). The new indicators of well-being and development (198 p). New York: Palgrave/McMillan.Google Scholar
  14. Giovannini, E., Hall, J., Morrone, A., & Ranuzzi G. (2009, September). A framework to measure the progress of societies Draft OECD paper (mimeo), 23 p.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (1992). De l’éthique de la discussion. Paris: Champs Flammarion.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Hirschmann, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jacksonville Community Council Inc. (2009). Quality of life progress report. Community Council Inc. For Jacksonville and Northeast Florida, 25th annual edition, 20 p.Google Scholar
  19. Jany-Catrice, F. (2008). The French regions and their social health. Social Indicators Research, 93(2), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jany-Catrice F. (dir.). (2009). Inégalités et pauvretés dans le Nord-Pas de Calais. Baromètres. Rapport pour le Conseil régional Nord-Pas de Calais. Etudes prospectives régionales, EPR, n°12, July. http://www.sigale.nordpasdecalais.fr/cartotheque/atlas/EPR_12_BIP40.pdf
  21. Jany-Catrice F., & Méda, D. (2010). Les conditions sociales de la production du rapport Stiglitz sur « les indicateurs de performance économique et de progrès social .», XIXème Journées de l’Association d’Économie Sociale, Charleroi, 9 et 10 septembre, Belgique.Google Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P., (dir.). (2004). Gouverner par les instruments. Presse de la Fondation nationale des sciences politiques.Google Scholar
  24. Lebaron, F. (2009). La crise de la croyance économique. ed. du Croquant, coll. Dynamiques socio-économiques, Paris.Google Scholar
  25. Livingston, D. N. (2006). Putting progress in its place. Progress in Human Geography, 30, 559–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malthus, T. (1836, 2nd ed. [1820]). Principles of political economy, considered with a view of their practical application. London: Willima Pickering.Google Scholar
  27. Marcus, V. et alii. (2008). Les indicateurs de développement durable. In l’Economie française 2009 (pp. 51–71). Paris: Insee.Google Scholar
  28. Méda D. (2008 [1999]). Au-delà du Pib. Pour de nouveaux indicateurs de richesse ?. Paris, réed: Champ Flammarion.Google Scholar
  29. Méda D., & Jany-Catrice. (2013). Les nouvelles mesures de performances économiques et du progrès social. Le risque de l'économicisme. Revue du MAUSS semestrielle, n° 41, 1er sem., Paris: La Découverte/MAUSS.Google Scholar
  30. Messu, M. (2003). La pauvreté cachée. Une analyse bachelardienne du concept de pauvreté. France: ed. l’Aube.Google Scholar
  31. Miringoff, M., & Miringoff, M.-M. (1999). The social health of the nation. How America is really doing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Nordhaus W., & Tobin, J. (1971). Is growth obsolete ? .», no 319, Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers from Cowles Foundation, Yale University.Google Scholar
  33. OECD. (2001). The well-being of nations: The role of human and social Capital. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (2011). OECD Better Life Initiative. http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/
  36. Osberg, L., & Sharpe, A. (2002). An index of economic well-being for selected OECD countries. The Review of Income and Wealth serie, 48(3), 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pittau, G., Zelli, R., & Gelman, A. (2010). Economic disparities and life satisfaction in European regions. Social Indicator Research, 96, 339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reddy, S., & Pogge, T. (2005). How not to count the poor. In Mimeo Columbia University, 70 p. http://sanjayreddy.squarespace.com/storage/papers/other-unpublished-papers/24HowNottoCountSSRN.pdf
  40. Salais, R. (2010). Usages et Mésusages de l’argument statistique : le pilotage des politiques publiques par la performance. Revue française des affaires sociales, n°1–2, 64ème année, janvier-juin.Google Scholar
  41. Saltelli, A., Jesinghaus, J., & Munda J. (2007, November 19–20). Well-being stories. Contribution to the experts workshop at the beyond GDP conference, EU Parliament, Brussels.Google Scholar
  42. Sen, A. (2004). L’économie est une science morale. La Découverte, Paris.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, D. (2000). Social justice revisited. Environment and Planning, 32, 1149–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stiglitz J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J-P. (2009). Report of the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress, 324 p. Available at: http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf
  45. Turk, J. D. (2009). Traction in the world: Economics and narrative interviews. International Journal of Green Economics, 3(1), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. UNDP. (1990). Human development report 1990, concept and measurement of human development. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  47. UNDP. (2009). Human development report 2009, overcoming barriers: Human mobility and development. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  48. Viveret. (2008). Reconsidérer la Richesse. Paris: Editions de l’Aube.Google Scholar
  49. Zotti, R. (2010). « Fiche technique sur les pondérations de l’ISS », miméo, Université Lille1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre lillois d’études et de recherches sociologiques et économiques/Lille Centre for Sociological and Economic Research and StudiesParisFrance
  2. 2.Institut universitaire de FranceParisFrance
  3. 3.Faculté Sciences économiques et socialesUniversité Lille1Villeneuve-d’AscqFrance
  4. 4.Direction du Développement Durable, de la Prospective et de l’EvaluationConseil Régional Nord-Pas de CalaisNord-Pas de CalaisFrance

Personalised recommendations