Advertisement

The Influence of Quality-of-Life Research on Quality-of-Life: CLIQ Case Studies from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

  • Heidi Elaine Attwood
Chapter
Part of the Community Quality-of-Life Indicators book series (CQLI, volume 4)

Abstract

Outsider or expert definitions for operational concepts used in quality-of-life projects usually differ from those of local people, and are therefore an inappropriate basis for implementing local projects. This chapter illustrates how multiple methods within an empowering participatory action research process can be used to provide an in-depth understanding of local definitions of quality-of-life. In particular it illustrates how this process created enhanced outputs for both researchers (in terms of better information) and participants (in terms of increased ability to improve their quality-of-life) because it investigated local understandings of quality-of-life; people’s goals in terms of improved quality-of-life; and factors that led to changed quality-of-life at different times within a 3 year research project. Analysis of these three approaches to the concept of quality-of-life shows many inter-linkages between different indicators of quality-of-life and shows how quality-of-life goals (or ‘ends’) can also be the ‘means’ for improving quality-of-life. It concludes that a participatory (and therefore subjective) approach to research and/or action projects benefits both participants and researchers, and in itself can be one of the reasons for participants’ actual improvement in quality-of-life.

Keywords

Small Business Common Indicator Birth Certificate Participatory Action Research Unemployed Youth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Attwood, H., Braathen, E., & May, J. D. (2010, September 8–10). Telecentres and poor communities in South Africa: What have we learnt? CPRC Conference: Ten years of ‘war against poverty’. What we have learned since 2000? What we should do 2010-2020? (p. 16). Manchester: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.Google Scholar
  2. Attwood, H., May, J. D., & Diga, K. (2011, October 26–28). The complexities of establishing causality between an ICT intervention and changes in quality-of-life: The case of CLIQ in four poorer communities in South Africa. The 5th International Development and Informatics Association Conference (p. 22). Lima: International Development Informatics Association (IDIA).Google Scholar
  3. Braathen, E., Attwood, H., & May, J. D. (2012). The role of politics in telecentres: Cases from South Africa. International Journal of E-Politics: Special issue on The Politics of ICT for Development, 3(3), 1–20.Google Scholar
  4. Burkey, S. (1993). People first: A guide to self-reliant, participatory rural development. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. CLIQ Participants, Attwood, H., Diga, K., May, J. D., & Barnard, G. (2011). Community-based Learning, ICTs and Quality-of-Life (CLIQ) Community Report: A participatory approach to assessing the impact of ICT access on quality-of-life in KwaZulu-Natal. Durban: School of Development Studies (now School of Built Environment and Development Studies), University of KwaZulu-Natal. Available at http://sds.ukzn.ac.za/files/CLIQ_Community_Report_2011.pdf.
  6. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Chambers, R. (2008). Revolutions in Development Inquiry. London: Earth Scan.Google Scholar
  8. Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Ali, S., Beer, C., Bond, L., Boumans, R., Danigelis, N.L., Dickinson, J., Elliott, C., Farley, J., Gayer, D.E., MacDonald Glenn, L., Hudspeth, T.R., Mahoney, D.F., McCahill, L., McIntosh, B., Reed, B., Rizvi, A.T., Rizzo, D.M., Simpatico, T., Snapp, R. (2008). An integrative approach to quality of life measurement, research, and policy. S.A.P.I.EN.S, 1.1 | 2008. Retrieved from http://sapiens.revues.org/169
  9. Coward, C. (2008). Why do telecentres deserve ongoing attention? Telecentre magazine. Retrieved from http://www.telecentremagazine.net/articles/article-details.asp?Title=Why-Do-Telecentres-Deserve-Ongoing-Attention?&articleid=212&typ=Telecentre+Debates
  10. Rahman, M. D. A. (1993). People’s self-development: Perspectives on participatory action research. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. White, S., & Pettit, J. (2004). Participatory approaches and the measurement of human well-being. Bath: UNU-WIDER, Economic & Social Research Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Howard College, School of Built Environment and Development StudiesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations