Advertisement

The Hepatic Artery Reconstruction First Approach in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Type IIIb

  • E. de Santibañes
  • V. Ardiles
  • F. A. Alvarez
Chapter

Abstract

Even though recent advances in liver surgery have led to a more efficient approach to hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), resection with curative intent remains a challenge for hepatobiliary surgeons [1]. There is strong evidence to show better survival and long-term outcomes when microscopically tumor-free surgical margins are obtained in these patients [2]. En-bloc resections of liver parenchyma with the extrahepatic bile duct is mandatory to manage tumors with direct hepatic invasion, as well as to accomplish an R0 resection on tumors that frequently extend longitudinally out to involve the hepatic ducts [3–5].

Keywords

Hepatic Artery Hepatic Duct Extrahepatic Bile Duct Future Liver Remnant Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Axel Beskow for the drawings included in this chapter.

References

  1. 1.
    Hemming AW, Reed AI, Fujita S, et al. Surgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2005;241:693–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, et al. Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2001;234:507–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, et al. Improved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection. Ann Surg. 1999;230:663–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sano T, Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, et al. One hundred two consecutive hepatobiliary resections for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with zero mortality. Ann Surg. 2006;244:240–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Settmacher U, et al. Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer: extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003;388:194–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, et al. Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1999;230:808–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagino M, Nimura Y, Nishio H, et al. Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2010;252:115–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miyazaki M, Kato A, Ito H, et al. Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not? Surgery. 2007;141:581–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Madariaga JR, Iwatsuki S, Todo S, et al. Liver resection for hilar and peripheral cholangiocarcinomas: a study of 62 cases. Ann Surg. 1998;227:70–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerhards MF, van Gulik TM, de Wit LT, et al. Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma—a single center experience. Surgery. 2000;127:395–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clary B, Jarnigan W, Pitt H, et al. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:298–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang WL, Tang XF, Yao MY, et al. Safety and efficiency of left hemihepatectomy combined with hepatic artery resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with artery infiltration: report of 2 cases. Can J Surg. 2008;51:305–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bismuth H, Corlette MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;140:170–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Majno PE, Pretre R, Mentha G, et al. Operative injury to the hepatic artery. Consequences of a biliary-enteric anastomosis and principles for rational management. Arch Surg. 1996;131(2):211–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, et al. Unilateral hepatic artery reconstruction is unnecessary in biliary tract carcinomas involving lobar hepatic artery: implications of interlobar hepatic artery and its preservation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:1526–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Young AL, Prasad KR, Adair R, et al. Portal vein arterialization as a salvage procedure during left hepatic trisectionectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:e1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miura T, Hakamada K, Ohata T, et al. Resection of a locally advanced hilar tumor and the hepatic artery after stepwise hepatic arterial embolization: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3587–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yasuda Y, Larsen PN, Ishibashi T, et al. Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with left hepatectomy after pre-operative embolization of the proper hepatic artery. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12:147–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee SG, Song GW, Hwang S, et al. Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010;17:476–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Shimada K, et al. Clinical significance of reconstruction of the right hepatic artery for biliary malignancy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;391:203–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Santibañes E, Ardiles V, Alvarez FA, et al. Hepatic artery reconstruction first for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma bismuth type IIIB with contralateral arterial invasion: a novel technical strategy. HPB (Oxford). 2012;14(1):67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and People's Medical Publishing House 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. de Santibañes
    • 1
  • V. Ardiles
    • 1
  • F. A. Alvarez
    • 1
  1. 1.General Surgery ServiceHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations