Advertisement

Accessibility of Public Spaces and Services: Theoretical Remarks, Practices and Instruments from Urban Time Planning

  • Stefano StabiliniEmail author
  • Roberto Zedda
  • Lucia Zanettichini
Chapter
Part of the Urban and Landscape Perspectives book series (URBANLAND, volume 15)

Abstract

The main objective of this contribution is to present the theory and time-oriented instruments to analyse and improve the design of supply and accessibility of public spaces and services for all inhabitants.

The supply and accessibility of public spaces and services in the realm of space-time urban design and planning requires an integrated approach to the physical design of urban space and to the organization of the city, for a better quality of the daily life of inhabitants. Urban quality is not merely an issue of quantity (of services and open spaces) but is also one of accessibility in relation to the temporal and spatial organization of the built environment. This includes the various relations between public and private spaces and considers the diversity of inhabitants and city users, in their body, gender, age, social and economic conditions, stage of life, ethnicity, etc.

A system of chronographic maps, indicators and datasets concerning the linear metropolitan system of the Po Valley presented here will be explored in order to elaborate on the following issues: temporary populations and resident inhabitants in contemporary urban areas, space-time morphology of inhabiting the urban system and accessibility and the evolution of the notion of proximity.

Keywords

Chronographic maps Accessibility Urban services Urban time planning 

References

  1. Balbo L (1991) Tempi di vita. Studi e proposte per cambiarli. Feltrinelli, MilanGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonfiglioli S (2010) Time studies in urban development: an Italian innovation. Urban Plann Int 3:27–36Google Scholar
  3. Boulin JY, Mückenberger U (1999) Time in the city and quality of life in Europe. Best – European studies on time, 1. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, DublinGoogle Scholar
  4. Brioschi L (1994) Due temi di progettazione. In: Urbanistica 103. Inu, Rome, pp 52–54Google Scholar
  5. Busi R, Pezzagno M (2011) Una città di 500 km. Gangemi, RomeGoogle Scholar
  6. Choay F (1992) L’orizzonte del posturbano. Officina, RomeGoogle Scholar
  7. Comune di Bergamo (2006) (ed) Piano Territoriale degli Orari della Citta di Bergamo, vol 2. http://www.comune.bergamo.it/servizi/Menu/dinamica.aspx?idArea=1182&idCat=1195&ID=1925. Accessed 30 July 2012
  8. Comune di Bolzano (2010) (ed) Master Plan della città di Bolzano. http://www.comune.bolzano.it/urb_context02.jsp?ID_LINK=3543&area=75. Accessed 30 July 2012
  9. Diotima (1987) Il pensiero della differenza sessuale. La Tartaruga, MilanGoogle Scholar
  10. Mareggi M (2002) Innovation in urban policy: the experience of Italian urban time policies. Plann Theory Pract 3(2):173–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martinotti G (1993) Metropoli. La nuova morfologia sociale della città. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  12. Naussbaum CM (2001) Diventare persone. Donne e universalità dei diritti. Il Mulino, BolognaGoogle Scholar
  13. Sclavi M (2006) La signora va nel Bronx. Bruno Mondadori, MilanGoogle Scholar
  14. Zedda R (2009) Tempi della città. Metodi per l’analisi urbana. FrancoAngeli, MilanGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Stabilini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Roberto Zedda
    • 1
  • Lucia Zanettichini
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Urban StudiesResearch Area Time-Oriented Urbanism, Politecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department for Architecture and Urban PlanningPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations