Beyond Vague Promises of Liveability: An Exploration of Walking in Everyday Life

  • Jenni KuoppaEmail author
Part of the Urban and Landscape Perspectives book series (URBANLAND, volume 15)


This chapter analyses walking as an everyday practice, which might have potential to improve the quality of life of urban dwellers as is suggested by voluminous policy discussion and scholarly literature in the field of urban planning. It analyses this assumption through exploring the shaping of walking experiences in both the short and the long term by asking: How do the qualities of immediate spatial and temporal experience merge into the everyday life of inhabitants? Do the daily walking habits of urban dwellers have a role in how they believe they can shape their quality of life in the future? The analysis draws upon walking-interview data with inhabitants of two Finnish cities. Interviews illustrated the multiplicity of perceived, qualitative temporalities of walking. We use and manage our walking time to open possibilities for various other experiences. The analysis shows that walking can offer individuals possibilities to enrich their everyday life and their relationships with their environment and enhance their quality of life. However, the general promise that walking enhances the liveability of cities must be put to the test and evaluated in relation to local socio-material conditions and individual spatio-temporal contexts of everyday life.


Pedestrians Walking Mobility patterns Everyday life Space-time use Perception Public space 


  1. de Certeau M (1984) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  2. Edensor T (ed) (2010) Geographies of rhythm: nature, place, mobilities and bodies. Ashgate, SurreyGoogle Scholar
  3. Forsyth A, Krizek KJ, Rodriguez DA (2009) Non-motorised travel research and contemporary planning initiatives (Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: emerging research agendas in planning). Prog Plann 71:153–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Franck K, Stevens Q (2007) Loose space: possibility and diversity in urban life. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Franzosi R (1998) Narrative analysis – or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative. Annu Rev Sociol 24:517–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gardner PJ (2011) Natural neighbourhood networks – important social networks in the lives of older adults aging in place. J Aging Stud 25(3):263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Horelli L (2010) Sustaining everyday life through psychological presence, time, and space. In: Karlsson K, Ellegård K (eds) Proceedings of the sustaining everyday life conference, Norrköping, 22–24 May 2009 [; Accessed 3 Feb 2012]. Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, Issue 38
  8. Ingold T (2000) The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingold T, Vergunst JL (eds) (2008) Ways of walking. Ethnography and practice on foot. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  10. Jokinen A, Asikainen E, Mäkinen K (2010) Kävelyhaastattelu tapaustutkimuksen menetelmänä (Walking interview method in case study research). Sosiologia 47(4):255–269Google Scholar
  11. Kaal H (2011) A conceptual history of livability. Dutch scientists, politicians, policy makers and citizens and the quest for a livable city. City 15(5):533–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaplan TJ (1986) The narrative structure of policy analysis. J Policy Anal Manage 5(4):761–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karjalainen PT (2004) Ympäristö ulkoa ja sisältä: geografiasta geo-biografiaan (From geography to geobiography). In: Mäntysalo R (ed) Paikan heijastuksia Ihmisen ympäristösuhteen tutkimus ja representaation käsite. Atena Kustannus, JyväskyläGoogle Scholar
  14. Kärrholm M (2009) To the rhythm of shopping – on synchronization in urban landscapes of consumption. Soc Cultur Geogr 10(4):421–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuusisto-Arponen A-K, Tani S (2009) Hengailun maantiede. Arjen kaupunki nuorten olemisen tilana. Alue ja ympäristö 38(1):51–58Google Scholar
  16. Lewis F (2011) Toward a general model of built environment audits. Plann Theory 11(1):44–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Macnaghten P, Urry J (1998) Contested natures. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Middleton J (2010) Sense and the city: exploring the embodied geographies of urban walking. Soc Cultur Geogr 11(6):575–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Norberg-Schulz C (1980) Genius loci. Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli International Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Peace SM, Holland C, Kellaher L (2005) Making space for identity, policy, practice. In: Andrews GJ, Phillips DR (eds) Ageing and place: perspectives, policy, practice. Routledge, New York, pp 188–204Google Scholar
  21. Peace SM, Holland C, Kellaher L (2006) Environment and identity in later life. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  22. Pinder D (2011) Errant paths: the poetics and politics of walking. Environ Plann D Soc Space 29(4):672–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raban J (1974) Soft city. The Harvill Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Solnit R (2000) Wanderlust: a history of walking. Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Szerszynski B (2002) Wild times and domesticated times: the temporalities of environmental lifestyles and politic. Landsc Urban Plann 61(2–4):181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomson JL, Philo C (2004) Playful spaces? A social geography of children’s play in Livingston, Scotland. Child Geogr 2(1):111–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Watts L, Urry J (2008) Moving methods, travelling times. Environ Plann D Soc Space 26(5):860–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Land Use Planning and Urban Studies Group, Department of Real Estate, Planning and GeoinformaticsAalto UniversityEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations