Advertisement

Moral Lessons from Monstrosity: The Kindly Ones and the Reader

  • Bettine Siertsema
Chapter
Part of the Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy book series (LOET, volume 31)

Abstract

The controversial novel The Kindly Ones by the American-French author Jonathan Littell shows a fictional Holocaust Perpetrator, Max Aue, telling in a detached way about his involvement in the mass murders in Eastern Europe, such as Babi Yar, the defeat of the German army at Stalingrad, the deportation of the Hungarian Jews and the death marches from Auschwitz. His attitude is ambivalent: he shows both unease and lack of guilt in describing his actions. His moral reasoning and the justifications he puts forward show similarities with those of historical perpetrators like Rudolf Höss and Adolf Eichmann. Aue wants to convince the reader that he is ‘just like you’, that in his position the reader would have acted in exactly the same way. This claim is weakened by his peculiar personal history and sexual doings. The flaw in his morale is caused by radically choosing the collective perspective over the individual one, both in regard to his own ideology and to the victims.

Keywords

Concentration Camp Female Character Common Morality Mass Murder Mass Killing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I want to thank Professor Dr A. van Harskamp, Dr M.H. Schenkeveld and Drs Liesbeth Eugelink for the careful attention they gave to early drafts of this paper. In particular I am appreciative to the anonymous reviewer of the next to final version. I made grateful use of their remarks, as far as I was able to.

References

  1. Arendt, H. 1963. Eichmann in Jerusalem. A report on the banality of evil. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. 1994. Organized guilt and universal responsibility. In Essays in understanding, ed. Jerome Kohn, 121–132. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. 2004. Persoonlijke verantwoordelijkheid onder een dictatuur. In Verantwoordelijkheid en oordeel, ed. Jerome Kohn, 51–75 (translation of Responsibility and judgment, 2003). Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.Google Scholar
  4. Armando, and H. Sleutelaar. 1967. De SS’ers. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.Google Scholar
  5. Binner, R., et al. (eds.). 1998. Wiens schuld? De impact van Daniel Jonah Goldhagen op het Holocaustdebat. Houten: Van Reemst.Google Scholar
  6. Browning, C.R. 1992. Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  7. Browning, C.R. 2003. Collected memories. Holocaust history and post war testimony. Madison: Wisconsin University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Browning, C.R. 2012. Revisiting the Holocaust perpetrators: Why did they kill? (Nooit meer Auschwitz lezing). Amsterdam: Nederlands Auschwitz Comité, NIOD & Sociale Verzekeringbank.Google Scholar
  9. Cesarani, D. 2004. Becoming Eichmann; Rethinking the life, crimes and trial of a ‘desk murderer’. Cambridge: Perseus.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, S. 2004. States of denial; Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dahlke, B. 2010. Nuda Veritas? Zum Effekt des Pornographischen in Jonathan Littells Roman “Die Wohlgesinnten”. In Scham und Schuld. Geschlechter(sub)texte der Shoah, eds. Figge Maja, K. Hanitzsch, and N. Teuber, 301–307. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Desbois, P. 2008. The Holocaust by bullets; A priest’s journey to uncover the truth behind the murder of 1,5 million Jews (translated from the French (2007) by Catherine Spencer). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, R.J. 2010. Review of Bloodlands: Europe between Hitler and Stalin – by Timothy Snyder. The London Review of Books 32(21):21–23.Google Scholar
  14. Goldhagen, D.J. 1996. Hitler’s willing executioners; Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  15. Höss, Rudolf. 1959. Commandant of Auschwitz; The autobiography of Rudolf Höss (translated from the German by Constantine FitzGibbon). London: Weidenfels and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  16. Klee, E., et al. (eds.). 1988. “Schöne Zeiten”. Judenmord aus der Sicht der Täter und Gaffer. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Krondorfer, B. 2010. Männlichkeit und Selbstmitleid; Religiöse Rhetorik in Selbstzeugnissen von NS-Tätern. In Scham und Schuld. Geschlechter(sub)texte der Shoah, ed. Maja Figge, K. Hanitzsch, and N. Teuber, 195–221. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Lipstadt, D.E. 2011. The Eichmann trial. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
  19. Littell, J. 2010. The kindly ones. London: Harper Perennial (translated from the French by Charlotte Mandell, Les Bienveillantes, 2008).Google Scholar
  20. Mendelsohn, D. 2009. Transgression. The New York Review of Books 56(5), 26 Mar 2009. www.nybooks.com/articles/22452.
  21. Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to authority; An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. Newman, Leonard S. 2002. What is a “social-psychological” account of perpetrator behavior? The person versus the situation in Goldhagen’s Hitler’s willing executioners. In Understanding genocide: The social psychology of the Holocaust, ed. L.S. Newman and R. Erber, 43–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nussbaum, M.C. 1990. Love’s knowledge. Essays on philosophy and literature. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Safranski, R. 1998. Das Böse oder das Drama der Freiheit. München: Carl Hanser Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Sereny, G. 1974. Into that darkness; From mercy killing to mass murder. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
  26. Sharpe, B. 1999. Modesty and arrogance in judgment: Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  27. Wieviorka, A. 2006 The age of the witness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press (translated from the French by Jared Stark, L’ère du témoin, 1998).Google Scholar
  28. Zimbardo, P. 2007. The Lucifer effect; How good people turn evil. London: Rider.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyVU UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations