Advertisement

Perceptions of Policy

  • Tiffany Jones
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Education book series (BRIEFSEDUCAT)

Abstract

Conceptualisations of policy vary across the field of education policy research, and sometimes even within a particular study (Ozga 1990). While understandings of policy have certainly developed and expanded over time, this is not to declare that there is a unified view on what policy ‘is’. Older ideas are not automatically supplanted by newer concepts as they emerge.

Keywords

Education Research Social Practice Education Policy Policy Document Policy Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, J. (1997). Out of the closet and into the network: Sexual orientation and the computerized classroom. Computers and Composition, 14(2), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, L. (2007). Examining dominant discourses of sexuality in sexuality education research. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(1/2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelides, S. (2008). The continuing homosexual offensive: Sex education, gay rights and homosexual recruitment. In S. Robinson (Ed.), Homophobia: An Australian history (pp. 172–192). Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  4. APA Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation. (2009). Report of the Task Force on Appropriate Therapeutic Responses to Sexual Orientation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  5. Apple, M. W. (1990). Ideology and the curriculum. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, S. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and tool boxes. Discourse, 13(2), 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball, S., & Exley, S. (2010). Making policy with ‘good ideas’: Policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of New Labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: Process, themes and impact. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Blakemore, K. (2003). Social policy: An introduction. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bowe, R., Ball, S. J., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education and changing schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Callewaert, S. (2006). Bourdieu, Critic of Foucault: The Case of Empirical Social Science against Double-Game-Philosophy. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(6), 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caputo, J., and Yount, M. (2006). Foucault and the critique of institutions. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Codd, J. (1988). The construction and deconstruction of educational policy documents. Journal of Education Policy, 3(3), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easton, D. (1965). A framework for political analysis. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  16. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 133–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Fairclough, N. (1998). Political discourse in the media: An analytical framework. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1969a). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1969b). What is an author? In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 113–138). New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, M. (1976). The history of sexuality: Volume one, the will to knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1981). The History of Sexuality (Vol 1) . Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Frank, M. (1989). What is neostructuralism? (Vol. 45). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fulcher, J. (1989). Disabling policies: A comparative approach to education policy and disability. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse. New York: Falmer.Google Scholar
  31. Gee, J. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Gilbert, R. (1992). Text and context in qualitative educational research: Discourse analysis and the problem of conceptual explanation. Linguistics and Education, 4(1), 37–58.Google Scholar
  33. Giroux, H. (1993). Border crossings: Cultural works and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Ham, C., & Hill, M. (1984). The policy process in the modern capitalist state. Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
  35. Harman, G. (1984). Conceptual and theoretical issues. In J. R. Hough (Ed.), Educational policy: An international survey (pp. 13–29). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  36. Holmes, K., & Crossley, M. (2004). Whose knowledge, whose values? The contribution of local knowledge to education policy processes: a case study of research development initiatives in the small state of Saint Lucia. Compare, 34(2), 197–214.Google Scholar
  37. Irvine, J. (2002). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley, California; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Jennings, R. (1977). Education and politics: Policy making in local education authorities. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, C. (1994). Reassessing Foucault. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Kenway, J. (1990). Gender and education policy: A call for new directions. Victoria: Deakin.Google Scholar
  41. Kogan, M. (1975). Educational policy-making: A study on interest groups and parliament. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  42. Leitch, V., Cain, W., Finke, L., Johnson, B., McGowan, J., & Williams, J. (2001). The Norton anthology of theory and criticism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  43. Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education Policy as a Practice of Power : Theoretical Tools, Ethnographic Methods. Democratic Options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lingard, R. (1993). The changing state of policy production in education: Some Australian reflections on the state of policy sociology. International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 3(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Luke, A., & Luke, C. (1995). Just naming? Educational discourses and the politics of identity. In G. Noblit (Ed.), Continuity and contradiction: The futures of the sociology of education (pp. 3–48). New Jersey: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mayo, C. (2000). The uses of Foucault. Educational Theory, 50(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McLaren, P. (1992). Border anxiety and sexuality politics. In J. T. Sears (Ed.), Sexuality and the curriculum: The politics and practices of sexuality education (pp. ix–xiv). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  48. Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Olssen, M., Codd, J., & O’Neill, A. (2004). Education policy: Globalization, citizenship, and democracy. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Ozga, J. (1990). Policy research and policy theory: A comment on Fritz and Halpin. Journal of Education Policy, 5(4), 359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perakyla, A. (2005). Analysing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (Third (Edition ed., pp. 869–886). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  52. Prunty, J. (1984). A critical reformulation of educational policy analysis. Victoria: Deakin.Google Scholar
  53. Raab, C. D. (1994). Theorising the governance of education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 42(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & O’Garro Joseph, G. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 365–416.Google Scholar
  55. Sabatier, P. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scott, J. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Snook, I. (2000). The Ethics and Politics of Values Education. Paper presented at the A Keynote Address to the Values Education Conference, 21–3 Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  58. Van Loon, B. (2001). Introducing critical theory. Thriplow: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  59. Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  60. Young, B. (2007). Rewriting the book on science instruction. Principal, 87(2), 28–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations