Advertisement

Cognitive Enhancement – To What End?

  • Michael HauskellerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance book series (TAHP, volume 1)

Abstract

If human enhancement consists in the making of better humans, then we obviously need to have some idea of what “better” humans would be like and in what respect they would be “better.” However, it can easily be shown that what counts as better is in fact highly context-dependent, so that there is no universal measure for human improvement. Cognitive enhancement is usually justified as boosting performance, but whether it is desirable for people to perform better very much depends on what they are getting better at, what end the improvement serves, and who benefits from it. Even an enhancement for an alleged “common good” can be, all things considered, highly undesirable.

Keywords

Cognitive enhancement Human improvement Happiness Freedom Common good 

References

  1. Bostrom N (2005) In defense of posthuman dignity. Bioethics 19(3):202–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bostrom N (2008) Why I want to be a posthuman when I grow up. In: Gordijn B, Chadwick R (eds) Medical enhancement and posthumanity. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 107–136Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan A, Brock DW, Daniels N, Wikler D (2000) From chance to choice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caplan A (2006) Is it wrong to try to improve human nature? In: Miller P, Wilsdon J (eds) Better humans? The politics for human enhancement and life extension. Demos, London, pp 31–39Google Scholar
  5. Glaser B et al (2011) Age- and puberty-dependent association between IQ score in early childhood and depressive symptoms in adolescence. Psychol Med 41:333–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harris J (2011) Moral enhancement and freedom. Bioethics 25(2):102–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hauskeller M (2010) Human enhancement and the common good. AJOB Neurosci 1(3):37–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hauskeller M (2011) Human enhancement and the giftedness of life. Philos Pap 40(1):55–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lewis CS (1955) The abolition of man. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Luria AR (1987) The mind of a mnemonist. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Persson I, Savulescu J (2010) Moral transhumanism. J Med Philos 35(6):656–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Savulescu J (2001) Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15(5–6):413–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Szalavitz M (2009) Popping smart pills: the case for cognitive enhancement. TIME Magazine, 6.1.09Google Scholar
  14. Vedder A, Klaming L (2010) Human enhancement for the common good: using neurotechnologies to improve eyewitness memories. AJOB Neurosci 1(3):22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Sociology and PhilosophyUniversity of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations