Advertisement

Back to the Facts – Herder on the Normative Role of Sensibility and Imagination

  • Anik WaldowEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 29)

Abstract

In his 1785 review of Herder’s Ideen zur Geschichte der Menschheit Kant stresses the negative effects of sensibility and imagination in undermining philosophy. This essay will offer a defence of Herder against Kant in order to gesture towards a more positive account of the cognitive function of these capacities. I will argue that the eighteenth-century fascination with the experimental sciences and the demand to engage in anti-speculative philosophy in fact called for the integration of sensibility and imagination. The reason for this call is that it is in virtue of these capacities that the mind is able to focus on the world of particulars and avoid the kind of metaphysical speculation that came under attack for its failure to account for the experienceable reality of human life. By analysing which cognitive role Herder attributes to our sensible and imaginative engagement with the world, it will emerge that the kind of inquiry advocated as a remedy against school metaphysics was not a reductive form of verificationism that pits the benefits of observation against reason, but a position marked by the belief that the mind’s best results can be achieved only if it commits itself to an integrated use of its rational and non-rational capacities.

Keywords

Sense Perception Linguistic Competence Conceptual Resource Linguistic Convention Environmental Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bacon, Francis. 2002. In The New Organon, ed. Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beiser, Frederick C. 1987. The fate of reason: German philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buffon, Georges. 1750. Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière. 3 vols. Paris: LaHaye (First published in 1749).Google Scholar
  4. Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de. 1746. Essai sur l’origine des connaissance humaines. Amsterdam: P. Mortier.Google Scholar
  5. Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de. 1780. La logique, ou les premiers dévelopmens de l’art de penser. In Oeuvres completes, ed. G. Arnoux and Gabriel Bonnot, abbé de Mably. 23 vols. Paris: Houel.Google Scholar
  6. Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de. 1991. Traité des systèmes 1749. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  7. D’Alembert, Jean Le Rond. 1995. Preliminary discourse to the encyclopedia of Diderot 1751. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. DeSouza, Nigel. 2012a. Leibniz in the eighteenth century: Herder’s critical reflections on The principles of nature and grace. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20: 773–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeSouza, Nigel. 2012b. Language, reason and sociability: Herder’s critique of Rousseau. Intellectual History Review 22: 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaukroger, Stephen. 2001. Francis Bacon and the transformation of early-modern philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaukroger, Stephen. 2010. The collapse of mechanism and the rise of sensibility. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haller, Albrecht von. 1757. Elementa physiologigiae corporis humani. 8 vols. Lausanne: Marc-Michael Bousquet.Google Scholar
  13. Haller, Albrecht von. 1981. On the sensibility of irritable parts of animals 1755. In The natural philosophy of Albrecht von Haller, ed. Sirley Roe, 651–699, i–xxxii. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
  14. Heinz, Marion. 1994. Sensualistischer Idealismus: Untersuchungen zur Erkenntnistheorie und Metaphysik des jungen Herder (1763–1778). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  15. Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1985. Werke in zehn Bänden. Frankfurt: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2002. Philosophical writings. ed. and Trans. Michael Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kant, Immanuel. 1902. Kants Werke, Akademie Ausgabe, vol. 8. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Locke, John. 1975. In An essay concerning human understanding 1700, ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  19. Longenesse, Beatrice. 1998. Kant and the capacity to judge: Sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the critique of pure reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nevinson, Henry. 1884. A sketch of Herder and his times. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Reich, K. 2001. In Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Manfred Baum. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  22. Riskin, Jessica. 2002. Science in the age of sensibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Sauter, Eugen. 1910. Herder and Buffon. Rixheim: F. Sutter.Google Scholar
  24. Schneiders, Werner. 1985. Der Philosophiebegriff des philosophischen Zeitalters: Wandlungen im Selbstverständnis der Philosophie von Leibniz bis Kant. In Wissenschaft im Zeitalter der Aufklärung, ed. Rudolf Vierhaus, 58–92. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  25. Sikka, Sonia. 2007. Herder’s critique of pure reason. The Review of Metaphysics 61: 31–50.Google Scholar
  26. Spitz, Lewis. 1955. Natural law and the theory of history in Herder. Journal of the History of Ideas 16: 453–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, Charles. 1991. The importance of Herder. In Isaiah Berlin: A celebration, ed. Edna Ullmann-Margalit and Avishai Margalit, 40–63. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Vanzo, Alberto. Experimental philosophy in eighteenth-century Germany (Manuscript).Google Scholar
  29. Waldow, Anik. 2010. The pretense of skepticism and its nonepistemological relevance in early modern philosophy. History of Philosophy Quarterly 27: 35–56.Google Scholar
  30. Wenzel, Christian Helmut. 2001. Beauty, genius, and mathematics: Why did Kant change his mind? History of Philosophy Quarterly 18: 415–432.Google Scholar
  31. Wolff, Christian. 1741. Elementa matheseos universae. Halle: Renger.Google Scholar
  32. Wolff, Christian. 1755. Praefatio Physicae Electivae Jo. Christoph. Sturmii Tomi II. In Meletemata mathematico-philosophica. Halle: Renger.Google Scholar
  33. Zammito, John H. 2002. Kant Herder, and the birth of anthropology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Zeuch, Ulrike. 1998. Sentio, ergo sum. Herder Yearbook 4: 143–155.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations