Advertisement

Kant on Imagination and the Natural Sources of the Conceptual

  • Johannes HaagEmail author
Chapter
  • 660 Downloads
Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 29)

Abstract

Kant famously defends an approach to knowledge involving two ‘stems’ that necessarily interact to generate knowledge of the external world. This comprises, on the one hand, the receptivity of our sensibility, responsible for intuitive representations, and, on the other hand, the spontaneity of our understanding, conceived as a faculty of conceptual representation. It seems that the differentiation between these two ‘stems’ aligns quite neatly with the distinction between natural and normative influences on our knowledge respectively. Conceived this way, one of the persisting questions of Kant scholarship is how nature and the normative can interact in such a way as to produce empirical representations that are shaped by our conceptual constraints. To explain how this is possible, Kant introduces the faculty of imagination, which, guided by the understanding, allows subjects of experience to “synthesize” the representational input of sensibility into conceptually shaped representations. Kant’s philosophy thus offers a complex account of the imagination as the capacity responsible for synthesizing the sensory and conceptual aspects of representation, thereby acting as an intermediary between nature and normativity.

Keywords

Receptive Sensation Intuitive Representation Productive Imagination Empirical Concept Sensory Consciousness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Haag, Johannes. 2007. Erfahrung und Gegenstand. Das Verhältnis von Sinnlichkeit und Verstand. Frankfurt a.M: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
  2. Henrich, Dieter. 1976. Identität und Objektivität. Eine Untersuchung über Kants transzendentale Deduktion. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
  3. Kant’s works are quoted in the usual manner after Kants gesammelte Schriften, vols. I–XXII ed. Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin 1902 ff., vol. XXIII ed. Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1956, vols. XXIV–XXIX ed. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Berlin 1966 ff. The translation mostly follows the Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant, eds. P. Guyer and Allen W. Wood.Google Scholar
  4. McDowell, John. 2009. Sensory consciousness in Kant and Sellars. In Having the world in view. Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars, ed. John McDowell, 108–126. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Rosenberg, Jay. 2007a. Divergent intuitions: McDowell’s Kant and Sellars’s Kant. In Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the images, ed. Jay Rosenberg, 266–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Rosenberg, Jay. 2007b. Perception vs. inner sense: A problem about direct awareness. In Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the images, ed. Jay Rosenberg, 230–242. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1963. Phenomenalism. In Science, perception and reality, ed. Wilfrid Sellars, 60–105. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1968. Science and metaphysics. Variations on Kantian themes. London: Routledge & K. Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1976. Kant’s transcendental idealism. Collections of Philosophy 6: 165–181.Google Scholar
  10. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1978a. The role of imagination in Kant’s theory of experience. In Categories: A colloquium, ed. H. Johnstone, 231–245. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  11. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1978b. Berkeley and Descartes: Reflections on the theory of ideas. In Studies in perception. Interrelations in the history of philosophy and science, ed. P. Machamer and R. Turnbull, 260–311. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Sellars, Wilfrid. 1982. Sensa or sensings: Reflections on the ontology of perception. Philosophical Studies 41: 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vaihinger, Hans. 1892. Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Stuttgart (Bd.1: 1881; Bd. 2:1892).Google Scholar
  14. Waxman, Wayne. 1991. Kant’s model of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Wolff, Robert P. 1963. Kant’s theory of mental activity: A commentary on the transcendental analytic of the ‘critique of pure reason’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations