Abstract
The Rosetta protein structure methodology has evolved as a comprehensive tool for protein structure prediction and protein design. The software suite includes modules for protein structure prediction, protein-protein and protein-small molecule docking, as well as protein interface, enzyme, and symmetric protein design. This paper describes two recent Rosetta successes. We describe how Rosetta’s structure prediction – when augmented with experimental data – was used to solve difficult molecular replacement problems, yielding high-resolution models for 8 of 13 structures unsolvable by alternate approaches. We also show how Rosetta may be used to redesign metalloenzyme active sites, repurposing a metal binding site to provide new catalytic activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bradley P, Misur KMS, Baker D (2005) Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 309(5742):1868–1871
Canutescu AA, Dunbrack RL Jr (2003) Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure. Protein Sci 12(5):963–972
Das R, Baker D (2008) Macromolecular modeling with Rosetta. Annu Rev Biochem 77:363–382
Davis IW, Baker D (2009) Rosetta Ligand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility. J Mol Biol 385(2):381–392
DiMaio F, Tyka MD, Baker ML, Chiu W, Baker D (2009) Refinement of protein structures into low-resolution density maps using Rosetta. J Mol Biol 392(1):181–190
DiMaio F, Terwilliger TC, Read RJ, Wlodawer A, Oberdorfer G, Wagner U et al (2011) Improved molecular replacement by density- and energy-guided protein structure optimization. Nature 473:540–543
Fleishman SJ, Khare SD, Koga N, Baker D (2011) Restricted sidechain plasticity in the structures of native proteins and complexes. Protein Sci 20(4):753–757
Fleishman SJ, Whitehead TA, Ekiert DC, Dreyfus C, Corn JE, Strauch E-M et al (2011) Computational design of proteins targeting the conserved stem region of influenza hemagglutinin. Science 332(6031):816–821
Jiang L, Althoff EA, Clemente FR, Doyle L, Röthlisberger D, Zanghellini A et al (2008) De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319(5868):1387–1391
Kellogg EH, Leaver-Fay A, Baker D (2011) Role of conformational sampling in computing mutation-induced changes in protein structure and stability. Proteins 79(3):830–838
Khare SD, Kipnis Y, Greisen PJ, Takeuchi R, Ashani Y, Goldsmith M et al (2012) Computational redesign of a mononuclear zinc metalloenzyme for organophosphate hydrolysis. Nat Chem Biol 8:294–300
King NP, Sheffler W, Sawaya MR, Vollmar BS, Sumida JP, André I, Gonen T, Yeates TO, Baker D (2012) Computational design of self-assembling protein nanomaterials with atomic level accuracy. Science 336(6085):1171–1174
Kuhlman B, Dantas G, Ireton GC, Varani G, Stoddard BL, Baker D (2003) Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302(5649):1364–1368
Lawrence MC, Colman PM (1993) Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 234:946–950
Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM, Lange OF, Thompson J, Jacak R et al (2011) ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487:545–574
Mandell DJ, Coutsias EA, Kortemme T (2009) Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling. Nat Method 6(8):551–552
McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ (2007) Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40:658–674
Qian B, Raman S, Das R, Bradley P, McCoy AJ, Read RJ et al (2007) High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 450(7167):259–264
Raman S, Lange OF, Rossi P, Tyka M, Wang X, Aramini J et al (2010) NMR structure determination for larger proteins using backbone-only data. Science 327(5968):1014–1018
Rohl CA, Strauss CEM, Misura KMS, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383:66–93
Sgourakis NG, Lange OF, DiMaio F, André I, Fitzkee NC, Rossi P et al (2011) Determination of the structures of symmetric protein oligomers from NMR chemical shifts and residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 133(16):6288–6298
Sheffler W, Baker D (2009) RosettaHoles: rapid assessment of protein core packing for structure prediction, refinement, design, and validation. Protein Sci 18(1):229–239
Siegel JB, Zanghellini A, Lovick HM, Kiss G, Lambert AR, St Clair JL et al (2010) Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction. Science 329(5989):309–313
Söding J (2005) Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21:951–960
Terwilliger TC, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, Moriarty NW, Zwart PH, Hung LW, Read RJ, Adams PD (2007) Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard. Acta Crystallogr D64:61–69
Zanghellini A, Jiang L, Wollacott AM, Cheng G, Meiler J, Althoff EA et al (2006) New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci 15(12):2785–2794
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Sagar Khare for helpful discussions on enzyme redesign.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
DiMaio, F. (2013). Protein Structure Modeling with Rosetta: Case Studies in Structure Prediction and Enzyme Repurposing. In: Read, R., Urzhumtsev, A., Lunin, V. (eds) Advancing Methods for Biomolecular Crystallography. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6232-9_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6232-9_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-6231-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-6232-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)