Advertisement

Leadership for Democracy

  • Lejf Moos
  • Börkur Hansen
  • Göran Björk
  • Olof Johansson
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 19)

Abstract

Two perspectives inform the discussion in this chapter. The first is the cultural, societal background of the Nordic countries. In general, the Danish, Icelandic, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish societies have a history of participatory and deliberative democracy with a strong focus on equity. Education systems were expected to further nation-building (producing democratically minded and competent citizens) in a school for all (one comprehensive school system with no streaming). There are differences between the countries in the balances between state and local governance, but these differences do not overrule the general societal and cultural tendency. This underlying foundation for society and culture is seen as the foundation on which citizens as well as professionals form their thinking and actions.

The second perspective is the contemporary political tendency towards neo-liberal competitive state politics with a focus on new public management tools and technologies like principal-agent models, managerial logics and outcomes focus. Education is in this regime expected to focus on basic skills, competition, excellence and employability.

In the everyday of school leadership, both tendencies are active in guiding thinking and action. School leaders endeavour to act according to the inherited values, while adapting to managerial demands. Contemporary governance logics make it possible to utilise room for manoeuvre, as the decentralisation of operations and tasks is accompanied by mechanisms for monitoring and control, some of which open up for translation of external expectations, for negotiating the meaning of demands, so they make sense internally in a given school. They make room for deliberations and thus for developing internal culture and discourses.

Keywords

Education System School Leader Competitive State Social Technology Comprehensive School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). The two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cavonius, G. (1978). Från läroplikt till grundskola. Helsingfors: Svenska litteratursällskapet i Finland.Google Scholar
  3. Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77, 211–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Communities of practice theory and the role of teacher professional community in policy implementation. In M. Honig (Ed.), Confronting complexity: Defining the field of education policy implementation. Albany: Suny Press.Google Scholar
  6. Consolidation Act No. 170 of June 2, 2006. Ministry of Education (Act on Folkeskole 2006).Google Scholar
  7. Consolidation Act No. 540 of June 24, 2005. Ministry of the Interior (Act on Municipal Structure 2005).Google Scholar
  8. Consolidation Act No. 730 of June 21, 2000. Ministry of Education (Act on Folkeskole 1993).Google Scholar
  9. Finnbogason, G. (1994 [1903]). Lýðmenntun. Reykjavík: Rannsóknarstofnun Kennaraháskóla Íslands.Google Scholar
  10. Finnbogason, G. E. (1996). Skólastarf og markaðslögmálin. Valddreifing, aukið valfrelsi og einkavæðing. Uppeldi og menntun, 5, 63–76.Google Scholar
  11. Guttormsson, L. (2008). Sundurleit skólaskipann 1907–1945. In L. Guttormsson, Ó. Rastrick, & Ó. Garðarsdóttit (Eds.), Almenningsfræðsla á Íslandi 1880–2007. Fyrra bindi: Skólahald í bæ og sveit 1880–1945 (pp. 75–89). Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan.Google Scholar
  12. Hansén, S.-E. (1988). Folkets språk i folkets skola. Åbo: Åbo Academy Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hansen, B., & Jóhannsson, O. (2010). Allt í öllu. Hlutverk fræðslustjóra 1975–1996. Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan.Google Scholar
  14. Hôôg, J., Fohaussan, O., & Olofssou, A. (2009). Swedish successful school revisited. Journal of Educational Administation, 47(6), 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kivinen, O. (Ed.). (1988). The systematisation of education. Basic education and the state school doctrine in Finland in the 19th and 20th. Turju: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
  16. Konráðsson, S. (2007). Íslenska: Móðurmál og anað mál. In H. Ragnarsdóttir & E. S. Jónsdóttir (Eds.), Fjölmenning á Íslandi (pp. 131–150). Reykjavík: Rannsóknastofa í fjölmenningarfræðum og Háskólaútgáfan.Google Scholar
  17. Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (Eds.). (2007). Successful school principals: International perspectives. Toronto: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Lög um fræðslu barna, 59/1907.Google Scholar
  19. Lög um framhaldsskóla, 92/2008.Google Scholar
  20. Lög um grunnskóla, 91/2008.Google Scholar
  21. Lög um leikskóla, 90/2008.Google Scholar
  22. Louis, K. S. (2003). Democratic schools, democratic communities. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(2), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moos, L. (2009). A general context for new social technologies. Nordic Educational Research, 29(1), 79–92.Google Scholar
  24. Moos, L. (2011). Sustaining leadership through self-renewing communication. In L. Moos, O. Johansson, & C. Day (Eds.), How school principals sustain success over time (pp. 127–150). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moos, L. (2012). Educational leadership in a competitive state: A contradiction in terms? International Jouranl of Educational Management, 26(5), 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moos, L., & Kofod, K. (2011). Danish successful school leadership – Revisited. In L. Moos, O. Johansson, & C. Day (Eds.), How school principals sustain success over time. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moos, L., Kofod, K., & Krejsler, J. (2008). Successful principals: Telling or selling? – On the importance of context for school leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Námsmatsstofnun. (2012). http://www.namsmat.is/vefur/. Accessed 8 Aug 2012.
  29. Norberg, K., & Johansson, O. (2010). The ethical dimensions of curriculum leadership in Scandinavian countries. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(3).Google Scholar
  30. Ottósson, K. G. (1990). Íslensk málhreinsun: Sögulegt yfirlit. Reykjavík: Íslensk málnefnd.Google Scholar
  31. Pálsson, S. (2008). Kirkja og skóli á 20. öld. Staða og þróun kennslu í kristnum fræðum og trúarbragðafræðum á Íslandi með samanburði við Danmörku, Noreg og Svíþjóð. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Iceland, School of Education, Reykjavik.Google Scholar
  32. Pedersen, O. K. (2010). Konkurrencestaten [The competitive state]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  33. Regeringen [the Government]. (2010). Danmark 2020 [Denmark 2020]. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  34. Risku, M., & Kanervio, P. (2011). Development plans and research – Key roles in developing education in Finland. In O. Johansson (Ed.), Rektor – en forskningsöversikt 2000–2010. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie (pp. 161–186). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.Google Scholar
  35. Røvik, K. A. (2007). Trender og translasjoner. Ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon [Trends and translations. Ideas that form the 21st century organisations]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  36. Shewbridge, C., Jang, E., Matthews, P., & Santiago, P. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Denmark. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siljander, P. (2007). Education and ‘Bildung’ in modern society – Developmental trends of Finnish educational and socialcultural processes. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Education as a social contributor (pp. 71–89). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  38. Stugu, O. S. (2001). Educational ideals and nation building in Norway 1840-1900. In S. Ahonen & J. Rantala (Eds.), Nordic lights: Education for nation and civic society in the Nordic countries, 1850–2000 (Studia Fennica, Historica 1, pp. 107–122). Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
  39. Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A., & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic model in education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Undervisningsministeriet. (2008). Private schools in Denmark. Copenhagen, Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  42. Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Woods, P. A. (2005). Democratic leadership in education. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lejf Moos
    • 1
  • Börkur Hansen
    • 2
  • Göran Björk
    • 3
  • Olof Johansson
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Education (DPU)Aarhus UniversityCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.School of EducationUniversity of IcelandReykjavikIceland
  3. 3.Department of General EducationÅbo Academi UniversityÅboFinland
  4. 4.Centre for Principal DevelopmentUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations